- Oct 14, 2012
- 4,981
- 8,609
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- West Ham DEN Broncos BOS Celtics
And?? Means very little TBH.Tim Kelly was taken after Fogarty
As i said... it's a rabbit hole not worth crawling into as adults.
Leave it for the kids TC.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
And?? Means very little TBH.Tim Kelly was taken after Fogarty
Which to be fair is a silly comparison as two guys in a forward line who play entirely different roles.
It’s like the debate that happened in here a week ago about playing Neale vs playing Bowes or Clark I think it was.
Like Neale and those guys don’t play the same role. It’s just pointless haha
Sometimes such debates are not so much about like for like, but if you were to rob Peter to pay Paul which brings the most benefit to the team?
Not for everyone, but some people enjoy debating such hypotheticals.
On output this year Henry. I'm assuming he was the potential late out but stayed in.Dempsey V Ollie Henry hypothetical.
You can only keep one.
Who do you keep and why?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I should clarify my Dempsey or Ollie Henry hypothetical question.
Choose one to keep on the list from this very moment.
One must go… Who do you keep and why.
Dempsey or Henry?
Easy... Dempsey... in a canter. The Flemington straight.I should clarify my Dempsey or Ollie Henry hypothetical question.
Choose one to keep on the list from this very moment.
One must go… Who do you keep and why.
Dempsey or Henry?
For me Dempsey. With OH there are a few areas you'd say he still needs to work at - defensive pressure, endurance, playing "small" as well as tall. Even if he doesn't improve in those areas you'd say he'll be an exciting player for a long time but maybe not a complete player.I should clarify my Dempsey or Ollie Henry hypothetical question.
Choose one to keep on the list from this very moment.
One must go… Who do you keep and why.
Dempsey or Henry?
Nup…don’t like that hypothetical….we all know that you need three Ollies…ohohoh.Dempsey V Ollie Henry hypothetical.
You can only keep one.
Who do you keep and why?

How good would that be? Three excitement machines all in the same forward line, coincidentally all named Ollie!!Nup…don’t like that hypothetical….we all know that you need three Ollies…ohohoh.
So I am ADDING Wiltchere and hearing nothing of it
Apparently Sydney making the godfather offerThe talks of JUH must all a dream... I haven't seen any news articles of him being linked to us.. I think its more of smoke in the regards that he was is our zone before it got shifted
I should clarify my Dempsey or Ollie Henry hypothetical question.
Choose one to keep on the list from this very moment.
One must go… Who do you keep and why.
Dempsey or Henry?
Dempsey was brilliant. Difficult decisions for the MC! Probably ends up a decision between him and Rohan...I’m a huge Dempsey fan, think he could be an elite forward/mid in a couple years and certainly a chance he could end up the better player.
But how anyone could say Dempsey over Henry at this stage is beyond me. One has had a 40 goal AFL season, one has had a single good AFL game.
Dumb question but is he really THAT good. He's not Buddy...Apparently Sydney making the godfather offer
Nah he isn't Buddy, but I think he would really suit their mobile forward line. He can also clunk a pack mark as well. Would be a huge get for them.Dumb question but is he really THAT good. He's not Buddy...
Yeah, exactly. O Henry was just outstanding last year.I’m a huge Dempsey fan, think he could be an elite forward/mid in a couple years and certainly a chance he could end up the better player.
But how anyone could say Dempsey over Henry at this stage is beyond me. One has had a 40 goal AFL season, one has had a single good AFL game.
I’m a huge Dempsey fan, think he could be an elite forward/mid in a couple years and certainly a chance he could end up the better player.
But how anyone could say Dempsey over Henry at this stage is beyond me. One has had a 40 goal AFL season, one has had a single good AFL game.
Henry's got AA potential, Dempsey's got top 5 player in the competition potential, but for interesting reasons IMO.Henry has obviously done more than Dempsey but Henry probably is a couple of years ahead of Dempsey in development.
Dempsey will probably have Henry covered in most facets of the game imo besides launching at marking contests…. and in saying that Dempsey also has that base covered.
It’s seems weird to choose a guy that was a rookie lister and not even a lock in the team a couple of weeks ago over a young gun forward that kicked 40+ in his third season.
… but I’d take Dempsey, the kid could be a freak in a few years.
Henry is a striker type for mine… he kicks a couple of goals but doesn’t do much else.
Hopefully both can explode for us.
Dumb question but is he really THAT good. He's not Buddy...
As good as buddy is his play style never converted to flags. I think JUH has every tool to be the dominant key forward in the game. Unlike Buddy he has an aerial game.Dumb question but is he really THAT good. He's not Buddy...