How many weeks will Judd get?

[SWANNIES RULE]

I reckon it should be 6 weeks, but if you factor in his clean record and the team he plays for then 3 weeks is a more logical prediction.

 

[bloodsbigot]

I reckon it should be 6 weeks, but if you factor in his clean record and the team he plays for then 3 weeks is a more logical prediction.

0 of course.

I wouldn't be surprised if all the umpires in the league showed up at the tribunal in Judd's defence.

 

[mulhollanddrive]

0, fairly.

1. Umpire was right there, nothing paid.
2. Campbell Brown says he was playing it up for a free kick.

Umpire/'Victim' say its nothing, so i'll find it hard for them to say it is. People will say its cause of Judd etc...

 

[RED AND BLACK SOLDIER]

none. It wasn;t that bad, and anyways, it's Judd, enough said.

 

[Quinz]

None. And the desperate squeals from the eagle haters will be music to our ears

Seriously though, he could get from 0-6 really.

 

[DOCKER MAN]

He should get 4 at least unlike farmers you can actually see it

 

[NorWest Bomber]

Life , no parole...................what did he do???

 

[HBK619]

I would guess 2 weeks but...

Farmer got 6 and Johnson got off, so who the hell knows.

 

[marcmurphy3]

2. Campbell Brown says he was playing it up for a free kick.

When did he say that? If he did then no way should Judd get suspended.

 

[steainsy]

If gets off, the tribunal system is an absolute joke.

 

[Quinz]

If gets off, the tribunal system is an absolute joke.

See the problem is, half will say that, and the other half will say that is he goes the tribunal is a joke.

Whatever the outcome, the tribunal is a joke anyway.

 

[Bourky23]

he will get off because its chris judd and you all know this..

 

[Hawkamania!]

IF there is no AFL bias, then three weeks.

Campbell Brown would probably end up with two weeks for deliberately trying to break Judd's fingers with his eye socket.

 

[oscarheel]

This shouldn't even be an issue, I mean it is Judd we're talking about. The AFL's love child.

 

[Kerrby]

IF there is no AFL bias, then three weeks.

Campbell Brown would probably end up with two weeks for deliberately trying to break Judd's fingers with his eye socket.

Yes i can definatly see YOU'RE NOT biased in your comments. Now Judd said it was an accident, so did Campbell.

 

[bloodsbigot]

Yes i can definatly see YOU'RE NOT biased in your comments. Now Judd said it was an accident, so did Campbell.

I wonder how much West Coke PAID Campbell to say that?

 

[greenlight]

Judd is an extremly fair player and i really dont thionk he was intending to gauge him...he will be given a reprimand...and allowed to play and be eligible for the brownlow

 

[Cynic]

I wonder how much West Coke PAID Campbell to say that?

I think it was more the heavy steel projectile weapon sticking into his back.

 

[Hawkamania!]

Yes i can definatly see YOU'RE NOT biased in your comments. Now Judd said it was an accident, so did Campbell.

I watched the footage and judged on that. Maybe the next time a soft body offence occurs, the offending player can play the "accident" card as well.

Browny is invoking the unwritten code and Judd should very grateful that he did. Either that or Judd came up to Clarko after the game and said "Talk to my manager in September when my contract's up. Here's his number."