Hudson for Ryder?

[Brahma Bull]

Is it worth it?

 

[1eyedPie]

i have both and IMO i don't think its worth it.

they're both mediocre at best, and for me ryder and hudson are cashcows that i will upgrade later

 

[GmeUP]

Not now.

 

[nick_savo]

too late now, ryder will go up heaps this week

 

[Dime]

I have them both and it's not worth it.

Oh and I played Hudson over Ryder

 

[mudgeathon]

I have them both and it's not worth it.

Oh and I played Hudson over Ryder

Did the exact same thing

 

[Big Member]

Did the exact same thing

Me too.

To make matters worse, last week I played Ryder over Hudson!!!

 

[Dime]

Me too.

To make matters worse, last week I played Ryder over Hudson!!!

Hahaha. So did I.
We suck

 

[borgy]

I have Hudson as a cash cow. I cant see much improvement from here (SC wise). Im trading him for Warnock the Freo guy next week most likely.

 

[magpies03]

personally i think the difference between the two is hudson is past his best. Ryder is a young gun who just keeps getting better and better. Downgrading hudson and running ryder on the field probbably isnt such a bad option. Ryder also does alot more work around the ground than hudson.

 

[brent-83]

personally i think the difference between the two is hudson is past his best. Ryder is a young gun who just keeps getting better and better. Downgrading hudson and running ryder on the field probbably isnt such a bad option. Ryder also does alot more work around the ground than hudson.

Past his best? He is just coming back from a major injury after entering the AFL as older player. His best is yet to come this year.

 

[magpies03]

Past his best? He is just coming back from a major injury after entering the AFL as older player. His best is yet to come this year.

Maybe your right. Just think Ryder shows a bit more potential. AA younger guy who seems to move really well and has a great leap on him compared to an older guy has has just come back from major injuries. Ryder is growing in leaps and bounds and i cant see hudson getting a whole lot better. Just my opinion anyway

 

[brent-83]

Maybe your right. Just think Ryder shows a bit more potential. AA younger guy who seems to move really well and has a great leap on him compared to an older guy has has just come back from major injuries. Ryder is growing in leaps and bounds and i cant see hudson getting a whole lot better. Just my opinion anyway

Fair enough. Ryder definately has lots of potential and will probably end up having the better career.

Hudson however, before he was injured was playing great and moving really well across the ground. By mid-season I imagine he will be playing much better than he is now. I wouldn't be swapping the two because for most of this year they will have very similar scores.

Its really a wasted trade.

 

[magpies03]

Fair enough. Ryder definately has lots of potential and will probably end up having the better career.

Hudson however, before he was injured was playing great and moving really well across the ground. By mid-season I imagine he will be playing much better than he is now. I wouldn't be swapping the two because for most of this year they will have very similar scores.

Its really a wasted trade.

yeh your probably right. I looked at it from the wrong way coz i have huddo on the field and ryder on the bench. Was tempted to downgrade hudson for someone worth 69600 and free up cash and have ryder on the field.

You right tho, i wouldnt trade for him