- Thread starter
- #151
I'm pretty sure he actually did none of those things and it was just clever editing by the Victorian media out to get him.
Nice try at sarcasm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.


If you are seeing this notice, posts and uploads you make now may be lost when we cut over to the upgraded system. This should only last a few hours.
Post feedback, issues, errors and omissions here. Read the OP first, please.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I'm pretty sure he actually did none of those things and it was just clever editing by the Victorian media out to get him.
Dont let the Victorian media influence you too much, they've already done a pretty good job at painting him as a thug. Hurley is more of a thug than Walker (see cab incident).
Yeah, I don't really care. I just wanted to be a dick. They're both jets, happy with HurlsNice try at sarcasmYes the pushing the North player into the post was dumb but not reportable, neither was the kick to the North player, he barely touched him FFS. And having a drink at a match during your week off would be the equivalent of you going to your a work event and having a beer. We're really going to crucify someone for this? Seriously the drivel that comes out of people's mouths on here! Hurley is the only player between the two who should have a criminal record and hence should be the only one labelled a thug. If you argue with that you have no idea how the legal system is supposed to work.
I'd take William Munny/clint eastwood/Harry Callaghan.If Texas Walker Ranger, you would have to take Chuck Norris.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
yeah that evil Victorian media. So much more biased than the fair and reasonable Adelaide media.
the whole premise is rubbish. Bias, pah. It's just selective bias mostly by interstate supporters. EVERY team thinks the media hates them. Why is that?The difference being that the Adelaide media is confined to Adelaide where it belongs but the Victorian media doubles as the national media. Pretty much every football TV show is based out of Victoria and many of the people on the shows don't even try to hide their bias.
Footy Classified? I wouldn't know, I don't watch that pus.Mate, Melbourne have been featured on Footy Classified every single week this year (Melbourne!) and Port have been mentioned about 5 times. They even managed to do a 5-minute review of the Port v Kangaroos game at one point without once using the words 'Port' or 'Power' or mentioning any of our players, including the one who kicked the goal that put us in front with 30 seconds to go. I guess I must just be imagining that, right?![]()
The umpiring carlton apparantly were on the wrong end off in perth a few weeks back got alot of press in victoria and so does the percieved view of hometown umpiring in perth and adelaide. But how many victorian journo's make issue with the free kick discrepancy adl continualy for 20 years are on the wrong end off? why when they speak about home ground umpiring they ignore this stat that is a significant trend?Let me put it to you this way. Victorian journalists don't favour Victorian teams for it's own sake, out of some kind of tribal state bias.
Tex for me. Is a star while Hurley has played two decent games as a forward.
Do you mean in his career or this year?
As far back as I can remember.
wowAs far back as I can remember.
Either way Walker has done more. Walker > Hurley.
Walker is a much better player than Hurley at this point. Better mark, better set shot, better kick, smarter player and has more of a presence on the field.
Is Hurley better than Walker at anything?
Walker has him covered in most areas. Walker is obv a better tackler as well.