- Banned
- #1,601
Some interesting articles in today's west.
I know that public health has to be the number 1 priority, but I hope McGowan doesn't turn off the AFL with his hard stance earlier in the week insisting on 14 day quarantines. The control measures that the AFL put in place should surely warrant an exemption. Having an AFL hub will be good for WA economy and extremely important to us as a club if we want to mount a serious challenge for this years flag.
Also - Here is an article from Duffield, he raises some good points. I especially enjoyed the analogy of Viccos crawling back to the VFL like a dog crawls back to its own vomit. I think I'll try that one out on the main board.
I know that public health has to be the number 1 priority, but I hope McGowan doesn't turn off the AFL with his hard stance earlier in the week insisting on 14 day quarantines. The control measures that the AFL put in place should surely warrant an exemption. Having an AFL hub will be good for WA economy and extremely important to us as a club if we want to mount a serious challenge for this years flag.
Coronavirus crisis: Premier Mark McGowan declares Perth a ‘frontrunner’ in proposed AFL hubs for Project Return
Peter Law & Steve ButlerThe West Australian
Friday, 24 April 2020 9:06PM
AFL clubs will be housed in Olympic-style villages under a plan to restart the season next month, with Premier Mark McGowan declaring Perth a “frontrunner” to host a footy hub.
The West Australian can reveal details about Project Return, which would see hotels and resorts converted into strictly controlled villages in one or two cities.
Under the AFL’s plan, up to 600 players and staff would be based in the quarantine zones for eight weeks and undergo weekly COVID-19 testing.
Crown Perth and Joondalup Resort have been identified as suitable locations in Perth for accommodation villages, from which the general public would be banned.
Clubs would travel to the hub on chartered flights and only be allowed to leave the village to play matches, train on approved ovals and attend medical appointments.
Optus Stadium would be the centrepiece of a Perth’s multi-venue hub, which would host between six and 10 teams, including the Eagles and Dockers.
West Coast chief executive Trevor Nisbett said Lathlain’s Mineral Resources Park, Leederville Oval and Joondalup’s HBF Arena could also be used for matches.
AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan this week wrote to State and Territory leaders to gauge their support, with Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide and Darwin also under consideration.
“The AFL’s current thinking is to establish quarantine zones, limit travel and reduce contact with the public by establishing an Olympic village-style model,” Mr McLachlan wrote in a letter seen by The West Australian.
All 18 clubs would be based in one or two hubs, with clubs split into various villages — hotels dedicated solely to the AFL — where players could freely move around without public interaction.
Once in their village, players would — at first — train together in small groups and then take part in match practice, being referred to by the AFL as a three-week “pre-season”.
Mr McGowan said he told AFL boss Mr McLachlan that WA was “very keen” to host a hub, so long as health guidelines were followed.
The Premier said States would next week receive advice from chief medical officers about the plan.
“If that comes back positively then of course we would be more than happy to host the teams here to play. It would be a very exciting aspect of the competition to have a bunch of teams based in Perth and it would be great for morale in the State,” Mr McGowan said.
“A lot of people are starved of entertainment at the moment and that affects people’s mental health. So for hundreds and thousands of people to be able to watch football, it would make them feel a lot better.
“It would be a good thing for a long, tough winter which for many people which will be relatively boring because they can’t travel and some are not at work or unemployed, so to watch some football would be a godsend.”
He said it would be “appropriate” for the season to restart in late May and he believed after Melbourne, Perth was a clear “frontrunner” as the city had Australia’s “best grounds and facilities”.
“Melbourne would have to have a share of it, but I think we’d be ahead of Adelaide and the Northern Territory. What I don’t want to do is get in a bidding war — I’m not going to pay money for it,” he said. “If States want to put up millions of dollars for it, we’ll let them, but we’re not going to do that.”
Players, staff and officials would be tested before travelling to the hub and then at least weekly in the first three weeks. Players would also undergo tests on match days to be approved to play.
The AFL will purchase polymerase chain reaction test kits to ensure there was no burden on the local health system. Blood tests to detect antibodies as a result of virus exposure would also be used.
“This would showcase WA and the wonderful work that’s been done here during this pandemic,” Mr Nisbett said.
“We have the hotels and we have the venues we can play at ... we’ve got everything in place to house anywhere up to six teams.
“It is a very positive move if everyone gets behind it and we can find a way to create the opportunity in WA.”
![]()
As part of the plan, the State Government may also be asked to consider self-isolation exemptions for visiting players which would see them to travel with their teammates on buses to training venues, before returning directly to their hotels without coming in contact with any members of the public.
It could form part of their two-week isolation requirement.
WA Football Commission boss Gavin Taylor added: “We have one of the best stadiums in the world, great support facilities and a good climate that could support the model.
“If the WAFC can play any part in making AFL games possible in WA safely, we are definitely keen to support that opportunity.”
A Fremantle spokesman said the club would “clearly” be enthusiastic about WA hosting an AFL hub. But new coach Justin Longmuir told radio station SEN today that Melbourne would be a “really good place” to restart if the AFL wanted all 18 teams in one State.
Also - Here is an article from Duffield, he raises some good points. I especially enjoyed the analogy of Viccos crawling back to the VFL like a dog crawls back to its own vomit. I think I'll try that one out on the main board.
Mark Duffield: Why Melbourne isn’t the best place for AFL hub during coronavirus crisis
Mark DuffieldThe West Australian
Friday, 24 April 2020 9:00PM
Mark Duffield
AFL ready for 2020 re-start
First the bouquet: our State Government has done a magnificent job of controlling the coronavirus.
We have the infection rates, or the lack of them, to prove it — three cases in five days with still little or no evidence of community transmission of this terrible virus.
But now comes the next challenge: where Australian Rules football is concerned, WA needs to get proactive on getting involved in the restart of a season which now looks inevitable and may come more quickly than previously thought.
We need to get proactive, because Victoria already has.
The Vics, always keen to go crawling back to the old VFL days in the same way that dogs crawl back to their vomit, are now proposing an 18-club hub in and around Melbourne.
The airing of the proposal by AFL fixtures boss Travis Auld had the Vics salivating and the rest of us thinking: “How Auld-fashioned”. It would be like getting Donald Trump in to inject disinfectant into the AFL’s arm and kill what there is of a “national competition” in its veins. The AFL has stood by its women’s competition through this crisis because it understands the damage to its brand that would be done if it abandoned it.
The AFL’s credibility as a national brand is on the line now. Why Victoria? There are more cases of coronavirus in Victoria (1337) than there are in WA (546), SA (438) and the Northern Territory (27) put together. Melbourne is a more compressed and congested city.
If you think you have ever been in a traffic snarl in Perth, trust me you haven’t.
Try getting from anywhere in or around the Melbourne city centre to anywhere else between 3pm and 6.30pm any day. Putting 18 teams in one hub there would increase, not decrease the chances of a cluster of infections that would kill this season once and for all.
That’s on the AFL, but this part is on us as a State: if we want to be involved in this, we need to work to get involved.
I am not talking about rushing to open up borders and put community health at risk but we should be pondering what our situation is going to look like in five weeks — and we should be talking now to the AFL about the protocols we can put in place here to shift teams in and out of WA safely.
Clubs now believe definitive announcements on the competition re-start remain a week or two away.
Most still believe that the earliest possible re-start will be late June and could be as late as July 24. But in order to do then, we need to start talking, acting and planning now.
We should be aiming for a minimum of six teams, possibly as many as eight in a hub here, with Optus Stadium the central point and the option of using other venues including Arena Joondalup, David Grays Arena Mandurah, Mineral Resources Park, Leederville Oval and Fremantle Community Bank Oval. We should be looking into the feasibility of extending the WACA by 10 metres at the western and eastern ends to turn it back into an oval with similar dimensions to Marvel Stadium. The ability to play night games there would be significant.
And we should at least be prepared to contemplate the possibility that at some point in WA, we may be in a position to re-introduce crowds regardless of what is happening elsewhere in Australia. Another three weeks of infection numbers like those this week would still leave us at least a month ahead of any AFL re-start with a growing body of evidence we are getting on top of this virus in WA.
We should be sending a clear message to the AFL that we not only want to be involved in this season, we are not going to stand for not being involved.






