Remove this Banner Ad

Insightful Media Coverage

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Some interesting articles in today's west.

I know that public health has to be the number 1 priority, but I hope McGowan doesn't turn off the AFL with his hard stance earlier in the week insisting on 14 day quarantines. The control measures that the AFL put in place should surely warrant an exemption. Having an AFL hub will be good for WA economy and extremely important to us as a club if we want to mount a serious challenge for this years flag.

Coronavirus crisis: Premier Mark McGowan declares Perth a ‘frontrunner’ in proposed AFL hubs for Project Return
Peter Law & Steve ButlerThe West Australian
Friday, 24 April 2020 9:06PM

AFL clubs will be housed in Olympic-style villages under a plan to restart the season next month, with Premier Mark McGowan declaring Perth a “frontrunner” to host a footy hub.
The West Australian can reveal details about Project Return, which would see hotels and resorts converted into strictly controlled villages in one or two cities.
Under the AFL’s plan, up to 600 players and staff would be based in the quarantine zones for eight weeks and undergo weekly COVID-19 testing.

Crown Perth and Joondalup Resort have been identified as suitable locations in Perth for accommodation villages, from which the general public would be banned.
Clubs would travel to the hub on chartered flights and only be allowed to leave the village to play matches, train on approved ovals and attend medical appointments.
Optus Stadium would be the centrepiece of a Perth’s multi-venue hub, which would host between six and 10 teams, including the Eagles and Dockers.
West Coast chief executive Trevor Nisbett said Lathlain’s Mineral Resources Park, Leederville Oval and Joondalup’s HBF Arena could also be used for matches.
AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan this week wrote to State and Territory leaders to gauge their support, with Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide and Darwin also under consideration.
“The AFL’s current thinking is to establish quarantine zones, limit travel and reduce contact with the public by establishing an Olympic village-style model,” Mr McLachlan wrote in a letter seen by The West Australian.
All 18 clubs would be based in one or two hubs, with clubs split into various villages — hotels dedicated solely to the AFL — where players could freely move around without public interaction.
Once in their village, players would — at first — train together in small groups and then take part in match practice, being referred to by the AFL as a three-week “pre-season”.
Mr McGowan said he told AFL boss Mr McLachlan that WA was “very keen” to host a hub, so long as health guidelines were followed.
The Premier said States would next week receive advice from chief medical officers about the plan.
“If that comes back positively then of course we would be more than happy to host the teams here to play. It would be a very exciting aspect of the competition to have a bunch of teams based in Perth and it would be great for morale in the State,” Mr McGowan said.
“A lot of people are starved of entertainment at the moment and that affects people’s mental health. So for hundreds and thousands of people to be able to watch football, it would make them feel a lot better.
“It would be a good thing for a long, tough winter which for many people which will be relatively boring because they can’t travel and some are not at work or unemployed, so to watch some football would be a godsend.”
He said it would be “appropriate” for the season to restart in late May and he believed after Melbourne, Perth was a clear “frontrunner” as the city had Australia’s “best grounds and facilities”.
“Melbourne would have to have a share of it, but I think we’d be ahead of Adelaide and the Northern Territory. What I don’t want to do is get in a bidding war — I’m not going to pay money for it,” he said. “If States want to put up millions of dollars for it, we’ll let them, but we’re not going to do that.”
Players, staff and officials would be tested before travelling to the hub and then at least weekly in the first three weeks. Players would also undergo tests on match days to be approved to play.
The AFL will purchase polymerase chain reaction test kits to ensure there was no burden on the local health system. Blood tests to detect antibodies as a result of virus exposure would also be used.
“This would showcase WA and the wonderful work that’s been done here during this pandemic,” Mr Nisbett said.
“We have the hotels and we have the venues we can play at ... we’ve got everything in place to house anywhere up to six teams.
“It is a very positive move if everyone gets behind it and we can find a way to create the opportunity in WA.”
West Coast Eagles CEO Trevor Nesbitt.

As part of the plan, the State Government may also be asked to consider self-isolation exemptions for visiting players which would see them to travel with their teammates on buses to training venues, before returning directly to their hotels without coming in contact with any members of the public.
It could form part of their two-week isolation requirement.
WA Football Commission boss Gavin Taylor added: “We have one of the best stadiums in the world, great support facilities and a good climate that could support the model.
“If the WAFC can play any part in making AFL games possible in WA safely, we are definitely keen to support that opportunity.”
A Fremantle spokesman said the club would “clearly” be enthusiastic about WA hosting an AFL hub. But new coach Justin Longmuir told radio station SEN today that Melbourne would be a “really good place” to restart if the AFL wanted all 18 teams in one State.

Also - Here is an article from Duffield, he raises some good points. I especially enjoyed the analogy of Viccos crawling back to the VFL like a dog crawls back to its own vomit. I think I'll try that one out on the main board.

Mark Duffield: Why Melbourne isn’t the best place for AFL hub during coronavirus crisis

Mark DuffieldThe West Australian
Friday, 24 April 2020 9:00PM
Mark Duffield

AFL ready for 2020 re-start

First the bouquet: our State Government has done a magnificent job of controlling the coronavirus.
We have the infection rates, or the lack of them, to prove it — three cases in five days with still little or no evidence of community transmission of this terrible virus.
But now comes the next challenge: where Australian Rules football is concerned, WA needs to get proactive on getting involved in the restart of a season which now looks inevitable and may come more quickly than previously thought.

We need to get proactive, because Victoria already has.
The Vics, always keen to go crawling back to the old VFL days in the same way that dogs crawl back to their vomit, are now proposing an 18-club hub in and around Melbourne.
The airing of the proposal by AFL fixtures boss Travis Auld had the Vics salivating and the rest of us thinking: “How Auld-fashioned”. It would be like getting Donald Trump in to inject disinfectant into the AFL’s arm and kill what there is of a “national competition” in its veins. The AFL has stood by its women’s competition through this crisis because it understands the damage to its brand that would be done if it abandoned it.
The AFL’s credibility as a national brand is on the line now. Why Victoria? There are more cases of coronavirus in Victoria (1337) than there are in WA (546), SA (438) and the Northern Territory (27) put together. Melbourne is a more compressed and congested city.
If you think you have ever been in a traffic snarl in Perth, trust me you haven’t.

Try getting from anywhere in or around the Melbourne city centre to anywhere else between 3pm and 6.30pm any day. Putting 18 teams in one hub there would increase, not decrease the chances of a cluster of infections that would kill this season once and for all.
That’s on the AFL, but this part is on us as a State: if we want to be involved in this, we need to work to get involved.
I am not talking about rushing to open up borders and put community health at risk but we should be pondering what our situation is going to look like in five weeks — and we should be talking now to the AFL about the protocols we can put in place here to shift teams in and out of WA safely.
Clubs now believe definitive announcements on the competition re-start remain a week or two away.
Most still believe that the earliest possible re-start will be late June and could be as late as July 24. But in order to do then, we need to start talking, acting and planning now.
We should be aiming for a minimum of six teams, possibly as many as eight in a hub here, with Optus Stadium the central point and the option of using other venues including Arena Joondalup, David Grays Arena Mandurah, Mineral Resources Park, Leederville Oval and Fremantle Community Bank Oval. We should be looking into the feasibility of extending the WACA by 10 metres at the western and eastern ends to turn it back into an oval with similar dimensions to Marvel Stadium. The ability to play night games there would be significant.
And we should at least be prepared to contemplate the possibility that at some point in WA, we may be in a position to re-introduce crowds regardless of what is happening elsewhere in Australia. Another three weeks of infection numbers like those this week would still leave us at least a month ahead of any AFL re-start with a growing body of evidence we are getting on top of this virus in WA.
We should be sending a clear message to the AFL that we not only want to be involved in this season, we are not going to stand for not being involved.
 
Anyone truly think the hub wont be in Vic? Gil always bows to pressure from the melbourne media baying at him, this was mentioned on abc radio this morning that how many interviews has Gil given to stations outside of Vic lately? None, and thats with requesting him every week.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Anyone truly think the hub wont be in Vic? Gil always bows to pressure from the melbourne media baying at him, this was mentioned on abc radio this morning that how many interviews has Gil given to stations outside of Vic lately? None, and thats with requesting him every week.

There is no way that Victoria will be excluded from hosting AFL games, but we don't know what that would look like.

Victoria has done very well at suppressing the virus given they had quite high numbers before restrictions came in to place. We also know that the government here in Victoria is highly activist, inserting themselves and placing pressure on AFL to make decisions about our national competition in the interest of Victorians (see: MCG deal).

There was a guy in the MB thread saying that the first hubs will be in WA and QLD to begin with. He also said that he had heard that finals will be a hub system with the entirety of the finals series played in Melbourne.
 
There is no way that Victoria will be excluded from hosting AFL games, but we don't know what that would look like.

Victoria has done very well at suppressing the virus given they had quite high numbers before restrictions came in to place. We also know that the government here in Victoria is highly activist, inserting themselves and placing pressure on AFL to make decisions about our national competition in the interest of Victorians (see: MCG deal).

There was a guy in the MB thread saying that the first hubs will be in WA and QLD to begin with. He also said that he had heard that finals will be a hub system with the entirety of the finals series played in Melbourne.

The AFL/MCG/Vic Govt decision will be made by Dan Andrews.

Imho, 'round robin' games in each of the mainland capitals make a lot of sense leading into a hub, IF its how they go.
 
More good news for us, Simmo and Vozzo are on a working group with the AFL who will work towards the footy dept cap. We already know from reporting and public comments that West Coast would like a little taken out of the soft cap as possible. Will be interesting to see how this goes;

"Footy's brightest minds will come together to guide the AFL and clubs through the return to play process and assess the future of football departments and the soft cap, and talent pathways.

Premiership coaches John Longmire and Adam Simpson will join AFL footy boss Steve Hocking and experienced football managers Geoff Walsh, Chris Davies, David Noble, Graham Wright and Craig Vozzo to assess the priorities and potential structures to enable football departments to run efficiently with reduced budgets."

 
The early hubs will be outside Victoria..

this will be the all the justification the AFL needs to play the end of the season plus all finals in heartland VFL

nothing surer.

I think there is a real danger of having a finals hub based out of Melbourne. Obviously that depends on how the country is tracking with suppressing the virus first and foremost.

What we need to more non-Victorian teams inside the 8. The more teams that would be affected by a Victorian finals series the less palatable that idea becomes. Hopefully at least one of the SA teams can get their shit together and Brisbane can sustain most of their form from last year.
 
I think there is a real danger of having a finals hub based out of Melbourne. Obviously that depends on how the country is tracking with suppressing the virus first and foremost.

What we need to more non-Victorian teams inside the 8. The more teams that would be affected by a Victorian finals series the less palatable that idea becomes. Hopefully at least one of the SA teams can get their shit together and Brisbane can sustain most of their form from last year.

Just as the NRL are learning with 9/Fox, so will 7/Fox influence very significantly when & where anything happens.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I'm starting to like the Cornes family
:smile:


The AFL must make the fixture more equitable following the coronavirus pandemic
As much as we love it and despite all the thrills, excitement, joy and heartache it has given us over the years, the AFL is a flawed competition.
However, as with a much-loved relative or friend we’ve overlooked the flaws, or at the very least, tolerated them.

There will never be a better time to get it right.
With this COVID-19 disrupted season the AFL virtually has a clean slate with which to design a much more equitable competition.
Football is definitely going to look a lot different when it eventually resumes. Let’s ensure it looks a lot better.

The biggest problem of the competition is the fixture.
It’s easy to call it a fixture because the system is rigged to give the biggest advantage to the strongly supported Victorian clubs.
When AFL executives’ key performance indicators are based on attendances and television ratings (and therefore revenue), their fixture is going to favour clubs like Collingwood, Richmond and Essendon.

For instance, last season Collingwood was gifted 10 matches that were played in the coveted Thursday or Friday timeslots.
Even a club like Carlton, which by any measure has been a basket-case for the best part of a decade, is scheduled to play in prime spots like the season- opener.

It is a draw weighted very heavily in favour of the Melbourne-based teams.
How often, for instance, is one of the popular Melbourne-based teams scheduled to play the dreaded Sunday evening game on the MCG? Rarely

The non-Victorian teams, especially those from Perth, are severely disadvantaged by having to travel every second week.
The grind of having to fly in and play every second week takes its toll.
In the 33 years that the Eagles have been in the AFL, not one West Coast player has reached the 300-game milestone.
Given the club’s history of success it’s an amazing statistic.

It would be met with typical Victorian hysteria but it would be much fairer in a 22 round season if the non-Victorian teams were scheduled to play two more minor round games on their home grounds.
That would mean fewer games on the MCG or at the Marvel Stadium and sometimes two games on the same weekend in Adelaide and Perth but why couldn’t that work?

Last season Richmond played 13 games on the MCG, including the last six matches of the minor round (as well as four games at Marvel).
It’s an enormous, unfair advantage.
However, note the outcry when Adelaide Oval was mooted as one of the hubs for this pandemic-impacted season.
“Too much of a home-ground advantage for Port and the Crows”, they wailed.
The hypocrisy is overwhelming. Actually the hubs are another way of ensuring equity in a season.
Players accommodated in similar facilities playing on standardised grounds would definitely even out the competition.

Then there is the inequity of teams not having to play each other twice over the course of a complete season.
Of course it would be ideal to have a season in which teams play each other twice in a home and away scenario but a 34 round minor season would be far too long for our physically demanding game.

However, a 17 round season where teams only play each other once would be fairer than the lopsided fixture we currently have.
Given the suggestion that football is going to resume with vastly reduced playing lists it’s not ridiculous to suggest the season should be shorter.

Another advantage the Victorian teams have is in recruiting.

The salary cap is designed to equalise the competition but sometimes it’s not about the money. Former GWS star Taylor Adams, who was recruited to Collingwood in 2014, said it all last week: “One of the big reasons I wanted to go to Collingwood was to play in big games like Anzac Day”.

The non-Victorian clubs need salary cap relief to retain their players. Don’t hold your breath though.
We saw what happened when Sydney’s cost-of-living allowance was constantly attacked by Eddie McGuire. Eventually it was removed.
These are crazy, uncertain times in which we are living.

Football has lost much of its relevance as we battle through the biggest crisis of our lifetime. However, football will return and after the crisis there is always hope, optimism and the opportunity to rebuild.


Please build it better.
 
Dual premiership Kangaroo David King says it’s “ridiculous” the league has disallowed WA-based AFL players from training in groups of 10, despite the state recently easing social distancing measures.
WA premier Mark McGowan last week lifted the local limit on outdoor gatherings to 10 people after the state recorded a declining number of new COVID-19 cases in recent weeks.

The new rule for WA would’ve allowed both West Coast and Fremantle to expand their training groups as the AFL edges closer to unveiling its plan to reboot the 2020 season.

But citing equity concerns, the league ruled no team could train together in groups of 10 until all 18 sides were able to.

“What we’ve said for equity, training won’t start until each state has agreed they can go to Level B so that we actually start together,” AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan told Fox Footy Live on Saturday.

“We need that for the equity of our competition. I think all our clubs and coaches and players agree with that.”

Speaking on Saturday, King said he couldn’t understand why the two WA clubs couldn’t begin training in larger groups considering the extra in-season travel they usually do.

“It’s ridiculous, really,” King told Fox Footy Live.

“We don’t make the team that the West Coast Eagles are playing in the Grand Final go and sit at the airport on the Thursday afternoon pre-Grand Final for two and a half hours, or mimic an advantage they give up for 11 weeks of the year, in any way, shape or form.

“They’re just asked to cop the travel factor, to cop the fact that it’s 30 per cent harder to win the flag from Western Australia, than it is from Victoria.”

King disagreed with the sentiment that earlier group training would be a “significant” advantage for those teams.

“We’re asking them to fly across the country 11 times a year and we’re worried about giving them 12 sessions as a group of 10, instead of a group of two? It’s crazy,” King said.

“They have to play an away game every time to win the Grand Final. Every time.

“This is a small opportunity to give them something back.”

But five-time premiership Hawk Dermott Brereton suggested the Eagles and Dockers would receive a leg-up on the rest of the competition, albeit a slight one early in the return-to-play journey.

Brereton also pointed to the home-ground the two WA teams get every year.

“For the first two, three, maybe four games that will happen over 20 days, that’s probably an advantage for them if they’re already training in the groups of 10s,” Brereton told Fox Footy Live.

“There’s benefits also on the flip side … the 11 home games they have, where they sit at home banking games. They (have to) win the games for sure, they’ve got to kick the ball through the posts. But 11 times teams have had to go through that going the other way.”
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

8FE8AACE-1C7C-4F2D-8B65-F5727530EE64.jpeg

Despite winning a flag and featuring 148 times for North as a player and coach, Dean’s 52 games with West Coast are enough to see him labeled as ‘former West Coast Eagle’ when the negative press comes out.

The media is incredible.
 
Despite winning a flag and featuring 148 times for North as a player and coach, Dean’s 52 games with West Coast are enough to see him labeled as ‘former West Coast Eagle’ when the negative press comes out.

The media is incredible.
In this case it's probably because 91.3 is a local news source and it'll get more clicks.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Insightful Media Coverage

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top