Mobbs
A Large Portion, Yes
I think saying the words:
Israel also killed Israeli children and civilians on that day. With tanks and choppers. We dont know the split of how many each side killed.
shows that Ghost Patrol accepts Hamas killed civilians.
To make it easy to notice I've bolded the bits above where its obvious GP accepts Hamas also killed kids and civilians.
If Israel also killed kids/civilians then someone else (ie Hamas) obviously did otherwise GP wouldn't have used the word also yeah?
Referring to each side killing people kind of implies that GP has accepted Hamas killed people given that each side in this conflict is Hamas and Israel ... yeah? Its not like this is a three sided conflict between Israel, Iceland and Sri Lanka.
I reckon the only reason you missed this is cos you've been programmed to by years of pro Israeli commentary and anti terror bullshit in western media. Cos to me it was obvious GP is talking about both sides (ie the IDF and Hamas) killing Israeli kids and civilians.
Its kind of understandable given how hard this narrative is being pushed: any criticism of what Israel is doing = you are a member of Hamas or want to be.
But its not really fair on that poster.
Reading it as Israel didn't only kill Hamas. They also killed children and civilians on that day. Hence the question.
Btw your use of an argument from incredulity part is a bit "unfair to this poster". That's nicest way to put it. But for every other part of your response, thank you. Will accept that.
And GP liked your post which is very appreciated also, GP as that does, actually both clarify (answer) AND repeat your condemnation of hamas (if hamas were responsible).