Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand

Remove this Banner Ad

That wasnt the question. I wasnt asking you the ethnicity of people you work with.

I was asking you:

1) Do you think 'Arabs' or 'Sudanese' people (or 'Chinese' or 'White' people) and similar are each a discrete biological race (with their own biological racial traits and racially influenced disposition)?

And

2) Do you hold any prejudices against any races (as a group) based on these differences and disposition?
Absolutely not , arseholes come in many different colors and shapes
 
Rush Limbaugh blames 'the Left':

“There’s an ongoing theory that the shooter himself may, in fact, be a leftist who writes the manifesto and then goes out and performs the deed purposely to smear his political enemies, knowing he’s going to get shot in the process. You know you just can’t – you can’t immediately discount this. The left is this insane, they are this crazy. And then if that’s exactly what the guy is trying to do then he’s hit a home run, because right there on Fox News: ‘Shooter is an admitted white nationalist who hates immigrants.’”

As does Jones and Infowars (blames the 'Left' while simultaneously calling it a 'False Flag'):

https://www.infowars.com/false-flag-why-the-world-has-questions-about-christchurch/

The usual Right wing nutjobs basically are either blaming 'the Left' or calling it a False flag, or both.

The White nationalists are in the middle of praising the clown, while also saying it was a false flag orchestrated by Jews.
Just a few post back I read some Muslim guy blame Mossad or something. So many conspiracies coming from this nut job shooter.
 
With my work, I mix with Arabs, Sudanese, Afghani, ******* Irish and Kiwi people, I don't have a problem with any of them, well maybe some of the Irish ******s. I do struggle with those that can't speak English (Scotsmen) If any one talks religion to me, it's all out war on what a backward campaigners they are.
Whats you point Mal?
And? You mix with them, thats cool. You can still be racist and mix with people of other races if you feel you are superior to them, which from your years of posting under different banned aliases, leads us to believe you feel that way.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Absolutely not , arseholes come in many different colors and shapes

Im glad to hear that then, and I retract my accusation.

For someone that doesnt have a problem with Muslims or Africans generally, you do spend a lot of your time posting s**t about them (in this and other aliases) and arguing we should persecute them or target them with special laws or stop them coming into the country, or labeling them all as rapists and criminals.

Anyway, I'm glad you agree that 'Biological race does not exist'.

Took us a while to get there, but Im glad you finally agree with me on that one.
 
Im glad to hear that then, and I retract my accusation.

For someone that doesnt have a problem with Muslims or Africans generally, you do spend a lot of your time posting s**t about them (in this and other aliases) and arguing we should persecute them or target them with special laws or stop them coming into the country, or labeling them all as rapists and criminals.

I have a confession to make, I did a white flight from living close to a mosque to where I now live, close to a synagogue. Oh what a difference.
 
This



seems pretty ultra-right (and ultra wrong, it must be said) to me!
That’s a twisting of what eco fascism is to a liberal ear. “It’s racist!” is always a good way to trigger the unthinking. The fundamental belief is that in a world of limited resources, which is impacted by climate change, it is folly to believe that everything can be shared equally, and that everyone is equal. Eg, should we have a welfare state supporting people to live a highly resource-intensive lifestyle, who contribute nothing in return?

If climate change is the greatest threat to humanity, then why do we pay for people to live carbon intensive lifestyles?

Let’s say only 1% of people escape the coming climate catastrophe. Who should be in that 1%?

As Paul Kingsnorth says:

Globalism is the rootless ideology of the fossil fuel age, and it will fade with it.​

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...ture-for-environmentalism-in-the-age-of-trump
 
Last edited:
You didnt answer the question.

Let me ask you again; do you think Arabs or Sudanese people (for example) are each a discrete biological race (with their own biological racial traits and racially influenced disposition)?

And if so, do you hold any prejudices against either of those races (as a group)?

If you answer 'Yes' to either question you're a racist. It doesn't matter how many 'non-white' friends you have.

Be honest. You and I both know the answer.
Do you or do you not believe that your own trite views of morality extend to judging people on whether they entirely agree with your trite moral code or not?

And that if they don’t entirely agree with your trite moral code - you believe you can smear them and feel superior?

And we know the answer is an emphatic yes!

Ergo you are incredibly narrow minded, narcissistic, and lacking all civil refinements necessary to be a decent human.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If I can jump in on this question.

Meds mentioned skin/eye colour to the first question. There are also different vulnerabilities to genetic diseases associated with race. I always use the Olympics as an example of physical differences between races, that I do not believe can be explained entirely by cultural differences. Then there's my anecdotal experiences in the gym, where Polynesian men seem to become extremely strong extremely quickly, and African men seem significantly better at growing muscle mass.

SoCiAl CoNsTrUcT
 
1) Do you think 'Arabs' or 'Sudanese' people (or 'Chinese' or 'White' people) and similar are each a discrete biological race (with their own biological racial traits and racially influenced disposition)?

And

2) Do you hold any prejudices against any races (as a group) based on these differences and disposition?
If I can jump in on this question. Meds mentioned skin/eye colour to the first question. There are also different vulnerabilities to genetic diseases associated with race. I always use the Olympics as an example of physical differences between races, that I do not believe can be explained entirely by cultural differences. Then there's my anecdotal experiences in the gym, where Polynesian men seem to become extremely strong extremely quickly, and African men seem significantly better at growing muscle mass.

I posted in the past that race can be determined objectively with genetic sequencing. To be honest I didn't really understand your response back then. But I believe race exists, and don't believe that makes me a racist. I don't believe that all members of any race share the same traits (eg not all polynesians will be gifted in terms of physical strength) but that there are differences on average.

To question two, the answer is no. I may have "prejudices" based on culture and life experiences of people. Eg I think many people would be on higher alert walking past a group of Sudanese males in the dark than they would other races. This is unfair on the majority of good Sudanese people, but I feel it is a natural reaction for many. But this is not based on anything biological, at least for me.
 
If I can jump in on this question. Meds mentioned skin/eye colour to the first question. There are also different vulnerabilities to genetic diseases associated with race. I always use the Olympics as an example of physical differences between races, that I do not believe can be explained entirely by cultural differences. Then there's my anecdotal experiences in the gym, where Polynesian men seem to become extremely strong extremely quickly, and African men seem significantly better at growing muscle mass.

I posted in the past that race can be determined objectively with genetic sequencing. To be honest I didn't really understand your response back then. But I believe race exists, and don't believe that makes me a racist. I don't believe that all members of any race share the same traits (eg not all polynesians will be gifted in terms of physical strength) but that there are differences on average.

To question two, the answer is no. I may have "prejudices" based on culture and life experiences of people. Eg I think many people would be on higher alert walking past a group of Sudanese males in the dark than they would other races. This is unfair on the majority of good Sudanese people, but I feel it is a natural reaction for many. But this is not based on anything biological, at least for me.
While I don't always agree with you, that was a honest and decent response. Kudos.
 
Eg, should we have a welfare state supporting people to live a highly resource-intensive lifestyle, who contribute nothing in return?

I believe that all able-bodied adults on the dole should be at the very least training for prospective new employment while unemployed. Of course disabled people have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, but if you're healthy enough you really should be working and putting your various taxes back into State coffers.
 
I believe that all able-bodied adults on the dole should be at the very least training for prospective new employment while unemployed. Of course disabled people have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, but if you're healthy enough you really should be working and putting your various taxes back into State coffers.
What about a carbon tax: should low income earners be reimbursed for excess power charges as a result of the tax or not?
 
What about a carbon tax: should low income earners be reimbursed for excess power charges as a result of the tax or not?

This is the Jacinda Ardern thread.

Just say that you support a policy that pleases everyone with no negative consequences and wait for applause. That is what the people want.
 
Don’t be a dumbarse. Fascism is and always was right wing.

No. How can corporatism be considered "right wing"? Fascism was about subservience to the state not about individual liberty.

https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power

If a formal architect of fascism can be identified, it is Benito Mussolini, the onetime Marxist editor who, caught up in nationalist fervor, broke with the left as World War I approached and became Italy’s leader in 1922. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:


The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. (p. 280)

Similarly, Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party adapted fascism to Germany beginning in 1933, said:

The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property. (Barkai 1990, pp. 26–27)
 
Every time there is an Islamist terror attack, we are told #notallmuslims. Actually, I wholeheartedly agree with that, because most Muslims are peaceful people who just want to get on with their lives, but why can we not say #notallwhitepeople when a nutcase of European descent goes on a rampage?
You can but it is so obvious that it is unnecessary; whilst they way media and politicians do bang on one gets a sense that it is “all muslims” therefore it becomes helpful to say not all muslims.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top