Remove this Banner Ad

Jack Viney

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it's a poor decision. Shocking really.

What I don't understand is all the hysteria. Talk of a land mark decision. Footy never the same blah blah blah

We get half a dozen of these shockers a year for bumps/collisions/contact that should never warrant suspensions. This is just more of the same. Not sure why the blow up over this one.
Have you actually seen the incident? If you have, how can you possibly call it more of the same?

This case differs because Viney's ONLY other option available than bracing for the contact of Lynch was to JUMP OUT OF THE WAY. Pirouette, I believe Gleeson argued.

Viney went for the ball.

He didn't leave the ground, in fact he lowered his body.

He had no other realistic options.

This case ticks all the boxes to be cleared bar the injury. And because of the injury, the AFL have concocted a ludicrous argument about the option of a pirouette. It would be funny if it didn't have such serious repercussions for the game.
 
If its not a contact sport, why are clubs LTI injury lists overflowing with contact related injuries?

Sure he's unlucky, but the game isn't soft.

Stop putting so much mayo on it.
 
But going by Procrastinators logic, Hodge should have pulled out of the contest and tackled Murphy after he took possession. For that is what he is suggesting Viney should have done here

Murphy never took possession though. Hodge won the contest and Murphy got collected in the process. So Procrastinator is right when he says they are not comparable incidents.

However, this decision is still a shit one. I'm just not sure why we're all surprised or outraged. It's no worse than plenty of others over the past few years.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

AFL legal counsel Jeff Gleeson proposed Viney could have "spun out" of the impending collision, rather than bracing for contact.

"Spun out"!?

I thought it is (was?) a contact sport. Who the hell is Jeff Glesson anyway? A lawyer...

Watching the replay of it, the bulk of the damage to Lynch appeared to occur as his head bounced back into Georgiou. I guess Viney was supposed to foresee this happening..
He is a lawyer and, according to 360, did exactly what a good counsel assisting should do. He submitted to the Tribunal that it was open to them to find that Viney chose to bump. He also submitted it was open to them to find he did not. Tribunal ****ed it up
 
Mark Bickley elbows Wakelin off the ball breaks his jaw = Adelaide supporters applauded his leadership
Not this little black duck.
Deserved every one of those 6 games.

( no excuse but i still reckon Bicks did that out of frustration with his team mates that day , seeing he was the only crow who played like he GAF up to that point of the game that day )
 
You have no idea how football is played.

Ridiculous comment!....The tribunal is made up of ex-players & they have deemed he had an alternative!....Hence the 2 weeks!

You have no idea how the system works or the rules apply, which are quite clear....Once again a huge media beat-up here & mass hysteria, of which you & your comment are proof of!
 
Have you actually seen the incident? If you have, how can you possibly call it more of the same?

It's just another shit decision where a fair action has seen a player suspended. I don't disagree that the decision is shithouse.
 
Not this little black duck.
Deserved every one of those 6 games.

( no excuse but i still reckon Bicks did that out of frustration with his team mates that day , seeing he was the only crow who played like he GAF up to that point of the game that day )
I miss your avatar
 
People need to start boycotting the game. Get onto Facebook and tell everyone to boycott the next 2 weeks games, the public has to start sending a message if the clubs or officials won't.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

People need to start boycotting the game. Get onto Facebook and tell everyone to boycott the next 2 weeks games, the public has to start sending a message if the clubs or officials won't.

I'm not going to the Hall of Fame.
 
Ridiculous comment!....The tribunal is made up of ex-players & they have deemed he had an alternative!....Hence the 2 weeks!

You have no idea how the system works or the rules apply, which are quite clear....Once again a huge media beat-up here & mass hysteria, of which you & your comment are proof of!
0-15
 
Murphy never took possession though. Hodge won the contest and Murphy got collected in the process. So Procrastinator is right when he says they are not comparable incidents.

However, this decision is still a shit one. I'm just not sure why we're all surprised or outraged. It's no worse than plenty of others over the past few years.
Who ended up with the ball in the Viney and Lynch contest btw?
 
Ridiculous comment!....The tribunal is made up of ex-players & they have deemed he had an alternative!....Hence the 2 weeks!

You have no idea how the system works or the rules apply, which are quite clear....Once again a huge media beat-up here & mass hysteria, of which you & your comment are proof of!


The tribunal is agenda driven. Do you honestly believe anyone thats played the game believes Viney had options?

Viney was suspended as it pleases a small noisy minority like yourself who think every

injury should see someone pay.

Oh unless that happens to be a player from your club.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Exactly, and you're also on the money re the media beat up shite. To all of you that think Viney was hard done by watch the incident frame by frame and you will see very clearly that Viney never at any stage had his eyes on the ball. He is clearly focussed on the Crows player and knew exactly what he was about to do. Guilty as charged and deserved a longer stretch.
With respect, that is complete bullshit. Watch it again and note exactly when the ball bounces and lands in Lynch's hands. The time after that to collision is, oh about tree fitty.

Srs though there's no possible time to form an intent
 
Who ended up with the ball in the Viney and Lynch contest btw?

No doubt. I haven't argued this wasn't a poor decision. I think he's been dudded.

The ball fell his way though after contact. He didn't actually win through to the ball first. That's where it isn't comparable.
 
54374_4f3007fa5ed406b40eb6ccd0ba36f353.png

54375_a2e832762e9954f4c34bb0ba177193ed.png

54376_de1cce143e803c969eddcbb9e274e057.png

54378_5e6fcb659d820205459b4c2c0bf37fd1.png

54379_3ba61b400ee1ab559c33727455a419f3.png
54380_e68fce8e51b6ca6fb6a5c0cbe1d05442.png
54381_70fc3d45ae374eda4e7b616e6625505e.png

Ball wasn't being contested at all. He could of side stepped, could of tackled, or could of put his hands up to hold lynch off. Instead he decided to bump and drive his shoulder into lynch. 4+ weeks

Ridiculous. Watch it in normal motion. The suggestion that he should have jumped out of the way is beyond comprehension. That moron , Gleeson is an embarrassment. I could show you a photo of a bullet fired at close range a metre or two from a person's head, freeze frame the speeding bullet and ask Oh-why didn't the deceased just duck?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom