shintemaster
Brownlow Medallist
So Viney is supposed to jump out the way & be dropped, bump & be suspended or not brace for contact & be knocked out himself?
Absolute howler of a decision!!
I think in reality Viney is supposed to not be there. That is the solution. I posted this on the North board but it is relevant here.
"I think players & clubs need to get the story loud and fast. It is not about whether you have a reasonable alternative, nor is it about making poor decisions. The AFL is trying to protect itself from litigation by punishing the result of certain onfield incidents. They do not need to be understandable incidents or ones that players can necessarily adapt too. They just need to be seen to be punishing - and therefore discouraging - these incidents. Basically, sh*t will happen and when it does - bad luck."
Essentially it doesn't have to make sense. I don't think they are expecting players behaviour to fundamentally change - because it genuinely can't - they are expecting to cover their own arses.
It's a poor decision, however as Brad Scott mentioned last night, most of the clubs stood by and accepted this earlier in the year. Perhaps one day, the larger clubs and supporter bases might realise that by allowing the AFL to hold the whip hand over so many smaller clubs they are making it impossible for those clubs to genuinely speak out against city hall.






