Remove this Banner Ad

Traded Jake Stringer [traded to Essendon]

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Funny how the narrative's been "GEELONG OFFERED PICK 20 YOU'RE NOT THE ONLY ONE" and now its we're the only ones to offer him a contract.

Geelong offered a trade up for a bloke that they didn't offer a contract to?

:D :D :D
 
of course its better cause its all your going to get.

surely dogs supporters will be demanding some heads roll at the WO. this has been amateur hour of epic proportions.

Agree questions need to be asked as this has been a mess, but to end with picks 9, 25, 26 and 30 is better than 9, 11, 46 and 80. I'm of the opinion we'll be using 4 picks.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Agree questions need to be asked as this has been a mess, but to end with picks 9, 25, 26 and 30 is better than 9, 11, 46 and 80. I'm of the opinion we'll be using 4 picks.

I think it's clear you're planning to use more than two, despite some comments in here - otherwise you would have had no qualms palming off your second rounder in the Pick 11 deal
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Pressed post before finished.
Why would arbitration be required? We don't have anything else to give other then what is on the table.

Unless you want Colyer or Howlett
 
Why would arbitration be required? We don't have anything else to give other then what is on the table.

Unless you want Colyer or Howlett

Future first.

IF they dogs were desperate to get rid of Jake, they would have asked for arbitration to get the future first on the table.

My bet, either the future first IS on the table or Jake is staying.
 
Future first.

IF they dogs were desperate to get rid of Jake, they would have asked for arbitration to get the future first on the table.

My bet, either the future first IS on the table or Jake is staying.
Both your guesses would be incorrect then
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

No.

Do I believe he's worth pick 11 + 45/50ish if 2 2nd rounders come with him?

Absolutely.
Its frustraing people leaving out key assets in trades and just focusing on pick 11 hey.


Im not even 100% dogs would accept bombers pick 11 package today, as has been said before its not that much better than their supposed offer now.
 
Future first.

IF they dogs were desperate to get rid of Jake, they would have asked for arbitration to get the future first on the table.

My bet, either the future first IS on the table or Jake is staying.
Then he stays at the Dogs from your point of view. Essendon haven't once indicated they will trade next years first.
 
Both your guesses would be incorrect then

Why a future first can be on the table? There is no reason for it not to be. It's what the dogs would want from the trade.
Two second round picks are useless for the dogs this year. They have limited list spots and won't use them.
 
EFC fans continue to be highly confident based on Bomber media propaganda.

History does repeat.

Amusing.
 
Why a future first can be on the table? There is no reason for it not to be. It's what the dogs would want from the trade.
Two second round picks are useless for the dogs this year. They have limited list spots and won't use them.
Because Essendon has steadfastly and publicly refused to put it on the table.
 
I think it's clear you're planning to use more than two, despite some comments in here - otherwise you would have had no qualms palming off your second rounder in the Pick 11 deal

Good picks still have currency even if they won't be used. Thy just get traded for future picks. So it never makes sense to view them as "we wouldn't be using it anyway".
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom