Jamie Elliott v Josh Green

[Slax]

Very interested to know what people think on this one.

By some basic stats,
Age: Elliott 3 days older
Height: 175cm v 177cm
Games: 52 v 53

 

[port_adelaide_1870]

Elliot just.

 

[drummond2fevola]

Hard one.

Elliott is probably more flashy and has bigger games, but Green is very effective in his role. I can't wait to see Green spend more minutes in the midfield over the coming years.

But right now you would probably have to go with Elliott.

 

[Hollow Knight]

Elliott is a better aerialist and a more natural leading forward.

Green a better ground level player.

 

[Stifler's mom]

Elliott by a lot.

 

[Jugada]

Elliott. Not even close

 

[Kram]

Elliot by a long way, silly comparison.

 

[Hollow Knight]

They've both got the most important quality you want in a small forward - punchable faces.

 

[Suit]

They've both got the most important quality you want in a small forward - punchable faces.

More so Green. Pasty ginga.

Saying that, Elliott by a mile.

 

[CasuallyDressed]

Elliot.

I just see him as a stronger player, can impact in the middle when he's not kicking goals and he's one of the better marks for a small guy I have seen for awhile.

Josh Green is a damn fine player though.

 

[Shaneprice97]

Love the way Green goes about it, but Elliot for mine.