The many, many dead people in the fighting in the Middle East that followed don't deserve some acknowledgement?
Not if they were killed by his friends in Hamas and Hizbollah (or were victims of the IRA for that matter).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The many, many dead people in the fighting in the Middle East that followed don't deserve some acknowledgement?
Re-elected in a landslide.
Look at the rats come crawling back now.
He lost amongst members who joined pre the last election. Typically idiotic of Miliband to stuff up membership rules and allow an army of thug trots to join the party.
Corbyn voted against his own party continuously in the past. Extraordinarily hypocritical of him to demand that MPs back his lunatic left agenda in parliament.
The concept of an army of trots scared you quite a bit eh meds?
Nope. They are irrelevant morons. The ones scared are the moderate labour types. It is they who will suffer the violence and abuse.
http://news.sky.com/story/nearly-half-labour-backers-expect-party-never-to-win-another-general-election-poll-10593893
You screwed up the formatting of that link.
By backers is it referring to voters/members or financial backers? Because only one of those groups is actually relevant to a people power party.
Nope. They are irrelevant morons. The ones scared are the moderate labour types. It is they who will suffer the violence and abuse.
http://news.sky.com/story/nearly-half-labour-backers-expect-party-never-to-win-another-general-election-poll-10593893
The liberals in Labour can go join the Lib Dems and test out just how strongly people feel about liberalism.
That may well be the case in southern England but up in the northern heartlands they aren't going to vote in large numbers for pre eu / mass immigration. If UKIP wasnt so poorly organised and riven with conflict it would be every chance to significantly increase its vote there.
He lost amongst members who joined pre the last election. Typically idiotic of Miliband to stuff up membership rules and allow an army of thug trots to join the party.
Corbyn voted against his own party continuously in the past. Extraordinarily hypocritical of him to demand that MPs back his lunatic left agenda in parliament.
Who cares if he lost amongst members that joined pre Miliband. What does that have to do with anything. Are their votes not worth the same as anyone else?
Its pretty clear alot of the influx has come from people that were disillusioned with Labor and didnt offer an alternative. Not all, but a substantial portion.
The opinion polls atm are dire. He is unlikely to win in 2020 unless a lazarus like resurgence takes place. The Blairites will try to blame it on his poor leadership but the truth is pre coup his poll numbers were within striking distance. Now post coup they are abysmal. Instability is death as was proved by the ALP.
Who cares if he lost amongst members that joined pre Miliband. What does that have to do with anything. Are their votes not worth the same as anyone else?
Its pretty clear alot of the influx has come from people that were disillusioned with Labor and didnt offer an alternative.
The Blairites will try to blame it on his poor leadership but the truth is pre coup his poll numbers were within striking distance. Now post coup they are abysmal. Instability is death as was proved by the ALP.
So what? It is a sham that liberals can dominate the parliamentary Labour party when their ideology is poles apart from from the socialism that the party's base has always preferred. It is well past time those MPs joined up with their likeminded cohorts in the Lib Dem and Conservative parties.
His only chance is a united party (not going to happen) and yes as you said a Tory implosion (much more likely but still not enough).
Deselect the troublemakers, select candidates that support the leader and the wishes of party members, bingo bango, you have a united party.How can he unite the party when Momentum have made it clear they want to deselect plenty of "moderates" and the boundary changes have given them a handy excuse to do so? I would think it extremely hard.
Please dont try to pretend it is all the Left's fault for the current state of the party.
There is no right and left. The so-called 'moderates' are liberals, and liberalism is not a mid-point between conservatism and socialism.
They certainly aren't liberals of the Adam Smith / English variety. They love state intervention.