Kirk and Everitt

[CursoryMercenary]

Firstly Brett Kirk, what a inspirational Leader, I thought he was very responsible for the Swans' fightback in the 2nd half and showed more leadership than hall and Barry. Should be made sole Captain next season.

And Peter Everitt, you don't need this jerk, you have Jolly and Stephen Doyle who I thought was very good and could push for the 1st berth next year.

Maybe just look for a new defender thats about it. Good luck for next year, no doubt we'll meet multiple times next year!

 

[natlovestheswans]

Firstly Brett Kirk, what a inspirational Leader, I thought he was very responsible for the Swans' fightback in the 2nd half and showed more leadership than hall and Barry. Should be made sole Captain next season.

And Peter Everitt, you don't need this jerk, you have Jolly and Stephen Doyle who I thought was very good and could push for the 1st berth next year.

Maybe just look for a new defender thats about it. Good luck for next year, no doubt we'll meet multiple times next year!

Leo, Brett and Barry all have different leadership roles. I definately want them to continue all being co-captains next year.

As for Everitt.. i don't want him, but who knows what will happen.

 

[Tuco]

The Grand Final showed that you really must have three quality ruckmen on your list. Jolly's finger (and to a lesser extent the stresses of having the baby) weren't enough to keep him out of the side this time. But what if he hadn't been available at all? Cox's dominance could have been even worse.

Yet again the ruckmen went unoticed in that game. Cox had 34 hitouts and Seaby 6 to Jolly's 7 and Doyle's 10. When the Eagles made their moves in the first half Cox was in everything, and to say we shouldn't at least pursue the possiblity of adding Everitt to a midfield that could desperately use some ball would show a lack of jurisprudence by our Football department.

 

[always right]

The Grand Final showed that you really must have three quality ruckmen on your list. Jolly's finger (and to a lesser extent the stresses of having the baby) weren't enough to keep him out of the side this time. But what if he hadn't been available at all? Cox's dominance could have been even worse.

Yet again the ruckmen went unoticed in that game. Cox had 34 hitouts and Seaby 6 to Jolly's 7 and Doyle's 10. When the Eagles made their moves in the first half Cox was in everything, and to say we shouldn't at least pursue the possiblity of adding Everitt to a midfield that could desperately use some ball would show a lack of jurisprudence by our Football department.

"Jurisprudence"......oh please

 

[Tuco]

"Jurisprudence"......oh please

I know it's a big word. Get a dictionary **** head.

 

[lethalselbow]

And Peter Everitt, you don't need this jerk, you have Jolly and Stephen Doyle who I thought was very good and could push for the 1st berth next year.

Sydney need Everitt. Cox smashed his ruck opponents in the GF. Could Everitt have made a difference of a point or two? He can drift forward and kick a few.

 

[always right]

I know it's a big word. Get a dictionary **** head.

I expected this response, but couldn't help myself......serves me right.

 

[mrbehemoth]

I thought Doyle was really good. I have heard some say he was terrible, but I thought when he went into the ruck he provided a much better contest and was the start of Sydney turning it around.

 

[mrbehemoth]

I know it's a big word. Get a dictionary **** head.

Actually, what you meant was "prudence". "Jurisprudence" is what judges and magistrates do.

 

[Tuco]

Actually, what you meant was "prudence". "Jurisprudence" is what judges and magistrates do.

This is true. That is the exact definition of the word. However as a turn of phrase it also pretty much means the same thing as showing good judgement. But at the end of the day I really don't give a **** either way. Pedantry bores me to tears.