- Joined
- Apr 3, 2018
- Posts
- 19,862
- Reaction score
- 12,286
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I would have thought all those point is what Nicks wanted and think is the correct way??? Clearly, the board has questioned them which is why they only gave him 1 year extension after finishing Minor Premiers.Does the club need to employ an 'expert outsider' who follows the club very closely but from outside the four walls. There just seems to be such a conservative group think from the football department. Needs to be some blunt truths, or at least questions, coming from the outside.
Now, there would definitely be things the outsider would not be privy too that would explain certain decisions/selections but where is the voice going:
- wtf are we shooting ourselves in the foot with this game plan we can't execute with this squad and it's running counter to the emerging style
- wtf are we selecting Jones, Murphy, McHenry etc etc instead of guys with far higher ceiling
- wtf do we shit the bed by going defensive so early every time we have the lead
- wtf are our top-ups taking most of the midfield spots in the SANFL
Could go on for pages but where is the critical voice of reason that can overcome the group think? Not that it will always be right of course but who challenges this stuff? Is it simply that the buck stops with Nicks anyway and that's the problem?










