- Banned
- #401
Space available
Good answer, but now I'm told it could have been machinery. Too much conflicting information right now. Not from you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Space available
Yes, it was reported that the guy doing the dig thought he may have chopped the body in half without knowing it.Good answer, but now I'm told it could have been machinery. Too much conflicting information right now. Not from you.
Yes, it was reported that the guy doing the dig thought he may have chopped the body in half without knowing it.
I don't need to try harder, it's a fact, something you should try to stick to.Carn Sprockets - try harder.
That wouldn’t explain the reported significant variation in decomposition, would it?
I don't need to try harder, it's a fact, something you should try to stick to.
That wouldn’t explain the reported significant variation in decomposition, would it?
Cant remember sorry,
That post was in April.
If i can recall then i will let you know asap
Apparently there was a fancy dress on Glyde St - opposite the Greer carpark.
The people there loved a mask and a floral number.
Later moved to Claremont.
Apparition? Stockist to the Carnival.
Beatnicked, you mentioned a discrepancy with the soil previously, perhaps you would you elaborate on specifics please?
I'd think it'd have to be a pretty sharp edge on a bucket that would cut clean through a body in plastic bags to seal the lower portion airtight and not expose any of it enough that you'd immediately realise you'd better take a look at what it was you just hit.
Similarly, it seems odd that an earthmover who regularly digs up earth would immediately recall something he hit on a job almost a decade before to turn up at the scene on the day they found the body to tell his story. It doesnt seem logical behaviour to me.
Surely in the ordinary course you'd take a couple of days to hear about it, recall the job, have it to occur to you then consider the possibility and perhaps call police instead. Unless he had his suspicions & it had always played on his mind.
I wonder if he knew the person who owned the property when he'd done the work for them originally? Or if he had another reason to want to place himself back at the scene on that day?
Obviously that didn't occur to the cops if they never bothered to get back to him. Very crappy police work in very odd circumstances IMO.
Isnt that standard practice or at least accepted practice in some circumstances?Dentists and an ortho were used to verify Sharon's teeth from photographs of the teeth found at recovery site!
Isnt that standard practice or at least accepted practice in some circumstances?
I would have thought given cops had the teeth in jaw a better option would have been to examine these not by looking at a photograph.
Expert pathologists stated they believed lower remains may have been in the ground for about 4/5 years due to adipocere formation.
That lines up with the 1987 works that were hidden from defense. The accused was jailed in NSW in March 1986 and convicted in 1987 and spent 5 years incarcerated there until June 1991.
Strange thing that someone may have placed the Mason remains in the ground when the accused was convicted and sentenced in NSW in 1987.
Chest freezers were fairly common back then. We had one and we were working class.Where would you keep the lower torso remains for such a period?
It was 1983. Domestic chest freezers were not common place.
Chest freezers were fairly common back then. We had one and we were working class.
Was it just the one pathologist that had this theory or were there others who all agreed? Freezing half a corpse and then placing it on top of a different half corpse seems a strange thing to do but serial killers aren't exactly normal.
I think she was born in July 1968.Sharon Mason was born approximately 1969
Sharon Mason was born approximately 1969