Ned_Flanders
Make me an Admin!
- Aug 22, 2009
- 77,158
- 142,372
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- 76'ers
I suspect someone is:
1. Using us to pick holes in the 'story' and clean it up
2. Alerting interested parties (media etc) that something is cooking for what reason remains to be seen.
Wait ans see but there is no way Cozza is making this up (so to speak), their is an angle here. Could it be Barkley St End?
I have two issues with his theories
firstly its so complex and over such a long period of time. as we saw in NSW and the Hunter deals, the ALP can barely keep one dodgy deal quiet, let alone a complex web of them over two decades.
secondly, its the why. Dodgy land deals I get, they have been a part of politics since Moses was a boy. what is the win however in getting EFC players to use supplements? As he mentioned in the initial post, the cost of failure as we have seen is catastrophic. Businesses will take that risk, but only when the reward is comparable to the risk. So what was the reward? They never invested in the company, so where is the win?





