did anyone else find it interesting that rendell didnt want to continue as a recruiting manager?
He signed the 3yr contract but only really because he wanted to complete this years super draft.
Most telling. A real backhander to Trigg.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
did anyone else find it interesting that rendell didnt want to continue as a recruiting manager?
He signed the 3yr contract but only really because he wanted to complete this years super draft.
Nice theory but...
People in football resign all the time whether on contracts or not.
Secondly, he did resign and was not fired.
I have always maintained that his intentions/motives were good and that he doesn't have a racist bone in his body. Nowhere have I said otherwise.Rendell's suggestion was made in good faith IMO. The idea was to help young people who come from a totally different cultural structure to adapt to the culture that surrounds city life and AFL football to maximize their chances of success.
Whether you agree with what Rendell was suggesting is irrelevant. His motives were good. Currently there has been a large failure rate with aboriginals drafted from remote areas, because they find it so hard to adapt to the huge demands of an AFL club and the huge differences in culture. His suggestion - for those who want to on a voluntary basis - is to spread the period over some years before they are drafted so they are not overwhelmed by a massive change in life and culture in one foul swoop.
I agree that he didn't intend his suggestion to come across as patronising. But can you see how some people could interpret it that way?He did not make his suggestion in a patronizing manner. He saw it as a contribution to overcoming the current high failure rate.
I don't think that's what's happening here at all. He's not getting in trouble for acknowledging the fact that they have a different cultural background. That's an accepted fact. I believe he's getting in trouble because his proposed solution to the problem is fundamentally racist in its underlying concept - not intentionally, but that's the reality of it.One final thing that really gets me angry.
I can say that Italians come from a different cultural background, as do Lebanese, as do Greeks etc etc, and nobody thinks I am being racist or trying to put them down.
But if I dared to say anything recognizing that aboriginals have a different cultural background, then the racist flag is being waved right, left and centre by certain people.
And that's what I think has happened to Rendell on this occasion.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Academies within their communities?
Not correct, Jenny, but that's irrelevant to the Rendell situation.
Even you have acknowledged that Rendell was not intending to be racist. If Mifsud and co saw something racist in his comments, then they should have thrashed that out with Rendell at the time, not assassinate him 6 weeks later.
It's not about choice.
The thought process behind the (alleged) Stolen Generations is that the aboriginal kids needed to be taken away from their parents and cared for by white people, in order become valued members of society.
Flawed analogy, yes
Our friend ClayMonk said this the other night. I told him he was making it up.
"I don't know that it was the AFL that did the executing. Rendell has been unprofessional on many occasions and whilst we enjoy his "straight talk", it is not usualy a good thing for the club. I think Trigg was sick of him blabbing to be honest, and I wouldn't blame him if this was the straw that broke the camels back"
ClayMonk, would you like to expand on this because you may have actually had a point.
Having heard Rendell speak for the first time last night ( I was not overly impressed), taken with his previous outburst and in addition to Trigg’s implied cover ups today, I feel that you may have a good read on the situation ClayMonk. This would explain the quick execution somewhat. Maybe Trigg had had enough and was looking for an out.
So Robbo will reveal all in tomorrows Herald.
He says he has learned today of other comments made.
So who is providing all of these little extra snippets of info to the media?
Seems that the more the sentiment swings toward Rendell the more damaging the next round of revelations that make their way to the Media.
Hopefully your club can make this right somehow. Maybe showing the CEO the door.It worked for us. Keep making noise and the board will listen. If they don't, show them the door instead.
I absolutely agree with you on this!This has become an AFL lead, orchestrated witch hunt - I don't know what the motivation is or why the lengthy delay.
On the other topic, I just think some people assume indigenous people are being "precious" when they take offense to things that are said - even those with great intentions. Vaders example is extreme for sure, but I believe it is possibly very valid in this case. And for indigenous people the sensitivity on this particular topic is greatly heightened for obvious reasons.
Why were you not overly impressed?
Also, can someone help me out? Trigg said Misfud was very offended, right? Have we heard this from anyone else? Demetriou? Or just Trigg?
Andrew McLeod and Raph Clarke (two indigenous stars of the game) have backed Rendell to the hilt.