Remove this Banner Ad

Matt Suckling or Nick Malceski?

Nick Malceski or Matt Suckling?


  • Total voters
    48

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

768173-2007-brownlow-medal.jpg
 
A lot of Hawthorn supporters have obviously voted.

Malceski by the Flemington straight and then some.
It has been a more than fair discussion from both sets of fans with both players having strengths and weaknesses.
Sucklings best game last year versus the Bombers obviously left a bad taste in your mouth.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Malceski. Suckling is a soft front runner. Yes his kicking is awesome but in finals he sucks bad.

Did it ever occur to you that Suckling was tagged during the finals?! o_O He needs to break opposition tags to become a better player.
 
Malceski is a better defender which helps him win this for me. If Suckling can become even an average defender it would be tremendous for Hawthorn as he is currently the best kick in the league.
 
There's no trolling here guys and gals. If you can't say what you want to say without calling someone a "soft frontrunner" then don't bother.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom