kymhodgemansmo
Team Captain
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2000
- Posts
- 401
- Reaction score
- 4
I remember raising some issues earlier in the year with regard to Melbourne and its disappointment as both a football club and team.
What is that makes the club continually self destruct on an almost bi annual basis now after years in the wilderness.
With the excitement of plaing in GF last year and a list of extremely talented youngsters, why are they languishing where they are.
Some fans took me to task about my criticism of David Neitz's leadership ability, but as the year evolves more and more so called experts are questioning exactly this. Has he improved in this role, or would he be a better player without this responsibility.
And off the field, where is the balance between a successsful businessman who knows little about football but a bit about running a relatively successful mining empire.
Should he be so autonomous in what he wants to do at a football club, and just why is there so much support for him.
He may have been the saviour of the football club, but has he past his use by date.
I am amazed at the groundswell of support he seems to have from the rank and file, but I wonder how Melbourne can continue to progress under his leadership when it apears obvious those respected around the club in a football sense have little or no faith in him (read Gary Lyon, Jim Stynes and the like).
Can someone please tell me where they are at, because a club with such history should not be living on such a roller coaster.
What is that makes the club continually self destruct on an almost bi annual basis now after years in the wilderness.
With the excitement of plaing in GF last year and a list of extremely talented youngsters, why are they languishing where they are.
Some fans took me to task about my criticism of David Neitz's leadership ability, but as the year evolves more and more so called experts are questioning exactly this. Has he improved in this role, or would he be a better player without this responsibility.
And off the field, where is the balance between a successsful businessman who knows little about football but a bit about running a relatively successful mining empire.
Should he be so autonomous in what he wants to do at a football club, and just why is there so much support for him.
He may have been the saviour of the football club, but has he past his use by date.
I am amazed at the groundswell of support he seems to have from the rank and file, but I wonder how Melbourne can continue to progress under his leadership when it apears obvious those respected around the club in a football sense have little or no faith in him (read Gary Lyon, Jim Stynes and the like).
Can someone please tell me where they are at, because a club with such history should not be living on such a roller coaster.








