Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I never understood all of the Ratten hate from some posters here (Big Red comes to mind). He did a pretty good job, taking us to the finals two years in a row, and it would have been a third if we had a healthy team all season. I guess some people just decide that they don't like a bloke and then waffle crap about them, even when it's not true.
As for Malthouse, I agree that chances are that it is already a done deal. They didn't just decide to sack Ratten in the spur of the moment -- they would have been preparing for this for weeks. In that time, you have to think that they would have spoken to their most desirable candidates. I think the only reason that it hasn't been announced yet is out of respect to Ratten, who is a legend of the club. As for Malthouse's media image/presence, I really couldn't give a rats arse. All I care about is what he can do with the club on the field, and he is one of the smartest, most experienced and best coaches in the game today. He's certainly my number 1 choice to take over next year.
He would commence official duties on the Monday after the Grand Final on October 1.
Carlton is believed to have made the call on Saturday, with a meeting scheduled between Malthouse, his manager Peter Sidwell and Blues powerbrokers, including president Stephen Kernahan.
Malthouse, 59, spent the weekend discussing the Carlton job with wife Nannette and his closest friends and family.
The Blues offer will be for a three-year term, costing the club well over $3 million.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
"Goddess"

Blues set to offer MM $3M
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/mor...-blues-officials/story-e6frf9jf-1226463332771
An interesting hyperthetical would be who we would take out of Buckley or Malthouse if they were both available? Who do we think is the better coach at this point of time?
Interesting? in that no one would pick BuckleyAn interesting hyperthetical would be who we would take out of Buckley or Malthouse if they were both available? Who do we think is the better coach at this point of time?
geez thats a head only a mother could loveI'd pick Buckley if I was making an amateur movie version of the Incredible Hulk and put Bucks in the lead role.
![]()
But otherwise...
And Eddie...geez thats a head only a mother could love
Eddie would kick his wife outta bed if bucks came through the door...And Eddie...
I'd pick Buckley if I was making an amateur movie version of the Incredible Hulk and put Bucks in the lead role.
![]()
But otherwise...
You want seven minutes of heaven in a dark room with FIGJAM?Imagine if punishment was 7 minutes of heaven in the dark room with Bucks......
I wouldnt call it 7 minutes of heaven really... more like 30 seconds... maybe a minute if there isnt a mirror in the roomImagine if punishment was 7 minutes of heaven in the dark room with Bucks......
I wouldnt call it 7 minutes of heaven really... more like 30 seconds... maybe a minute if there isnt a mirror in the room
But as TG said... you have to get past Eddie Everywhere first!
Well, the words in the latest article seem better. Obviously we have moved on this a while back, so in that case, the only issue is the deception and the various parts played in it. As far as the future, once it is in place, I will fall in behind. I just want Malthouse to respect the club, respect the players, and not hold us to ransom and put himself on a pedestal. We have to much pride for that. All moving sensibly and respectfully in the right direction, taking the time to listen to others, talk to the players, before making his cuts, then all should be okay.
Eddie keeps sending FIGJAM little messages like 'I'll be in the change rooms at 13:00 covered in maple syrup'Let me guess... Eddie missed training again and has been a very naughty boy
Gets two choice:
a) 2 week suspension
b) 7 minutes of heaven with FIGJAM
Sticks obviously stuffed it up with his end of season review contention. There was never going to be a review. He should have just said Ratten is the Carlton coach until he isn't and left it at that. Privately he might have prepared Ratts but that obviously did not happen. The thing is Ratten probably would have opted to see out the year and not told anybody, such is the class of the man. Nothing worse than telling someone they still have a chance when no matter what he did, he probably didn't.And as I posted in some of the earlier debates on here ODN, I wouldn't be getting too upset with the club or MM over the 'deception'. This process would have been a whole lot more distasteful for Ratts if these negotiations were done in public a la the Matthew Knights saga which dragged on for weeks and weeks. As we all know, sometimes in business or politics (and let's face it footys a combination of both) a lot of lobbying and negotiation has to go on behind closed doors.
Eddie keeps sending FIGJAM little messages like 'I'll be in the change rooms at 13:00 covered in maple syrup'
Well, the words in the latest article seem better. Obviously we have moved on this a while back, so in that case, the only issue is the deception and the various parts played in it. As far as the future, once it is in place, I will fall in behind. I just want Malthouse to respect the club, respect the players, and not hold us to ransom and put himself on a pedestal. We have to much pride for that. All moving sensibly and respectfully in the right direction, taking the time to listen to others, talk to the players, before making his cuts, then all should be okay.
One thing is for sure, Sticks certainly put an end to the boy's club accusation.




