Mitch McGovern

Remove this Banner Ad

Just admit you got it wrong that you brought up JJ instead of Rance's tagging opponent Otten... or keeping digging a hole to give this board a good laugh at your observation. ;)
I do every time he is always right
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Looks like he has been shrunk down to microscopic size and is standing inside a bleached a-hole passage

1542593148842_GUR1UF4PC.1-2.jpg
Spontaneously combusting in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
 
FFS John

Where do you pull this crap from?

It’s not only false I can’t believe you even think it is
I was talking in response to a poster thinking the medical staff aren’t involved in deciding on a return from an injury. They are involved prior to the fitness staff.
Why do you think I’m pulling out crap?
A doctor will decide when a player can resume training. A modified program may be discussed at this point also.
Once back in training, its the fitness staff/coaches that decide if your right to go in a match.
You basically repeated what I’ve been saying..?
 
My wife's cousin is Store Manager at a Western Suburbs KFC.

Probabaly coincidental but she told me sales in November are tracking downwards compared to previous months....

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Have you asked her directly if McGov was a frequent flyer at that store?
 
I was talking in response to a poster thinking the medical staff aren’t involved in deciding on a return from an injury. They are involved prior to the fitness staff.
Why do you think I’m pulling out crap?

You basically repeated what I’ve been saying..?

* off John

You make (yet another) crazy arsed statement that medical staff must sign off a player’s return from injury almost as if it’s a legal requirement, and immediately you water it down to “involved”

How about you stop pretending to have expertise, and just soften your delivery.

It’s like you think lunatic levels of certainty in your posting style adds weight & credibility. It has the opposite effect
 
**** off John

You make (yet another) crazy arsed statement that medical staff must sign off a player’s return from injury almost as if it’s a legal requirement, and immediately you water it down to “involved”

How about you stop pretending to have expertise, and just soften your delivery.

It’s like you think lunatic levels of certainty in your posting style adds weight & credibility. It has the opposite effect
Ironic don't you think that you are asking another poster to "soften their delivery"...
 
**** off John

You make (yet another) crazy arsed statement that medical staff must sign off a player’s return from injury almost as if it’s a legal requirement, and immediately you water it down to “involved”

How about you stop pretending to have expertise, and just soften your delivery.

It’s like you think lunatic levels of certainty in your posting style adds weight & credibility. It has the opposite effect
Stop being an ass and focus on the content. I don’t claim to know what is involved in details inside the club. I do claim to work in the health field so I have rights to give input on this matter.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Stop being an ass and focus on the content. I don’t claim to know what is involved in details inside the club. I do claim to work in the health field so I have rights to give input on this matter.

1. Your content is the problem

2. the health field is deliberately vague and meaningless

3. see point 1
 
Yep. The way to curtail his influence is to put a forward on him who makes him accountable defensively and keeps him closer to the goals. That certainly isn't Otten.
I think everyone on here would agree that playing Otten at all in the GF was a mistake. Unfortunately earlier in 2017 he did play quite well in that position (including vs Richmond I think), so we were sucked in to thinking that this would continue in finals (let alone a GF). That was comprehensively shown to be wrong. If we can take a positive from it, we seemed to have learned the lesson you mention above. Let's hope we can get back to a position where it can actually be useful in September
 
Gov hasn't started preseason yet apparently due to end of season surgery, and won't start until after Xmas. Be in even worse shape next year, which will also make him susceptible to more injuries during the season. Oh dear...


Can't wait til he turns up after Xmas and they stop him at the gate saying " I'm sorry Mr Dew but this is a closed training session"
 
Gov hasn't started preseason yet apparently due to end of season surgery, and won't start until after Xmas. Be in even worse shape next year, which will also make him susceptible to more injuries during the season. Oh dear...
The "leave Adelaide" curse continues...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
FFS John

Where do you pull this crap from?

It’s not only false I can’t believe you even think it is


Johnny Boy had to get a medical certificate for a day off in his mysterious* health related field so he is an expert on this subject dammit Sanders!

*
did some paperwork for a worker's comp firm as a temp one time
 
**** off John

You make (yet another) crazy arsed statement that medical staff must sign off a player’s return from injury almost as if it’s a legal requirement, and immediately you water it down to “involved”

How about you stop pretending to have expertise, and just soften your delivery.

It’s like you think lunatic levels of certainty in your posting style adds weight & credibility. It has the opposite effect
Without getting into a bullshit argument, and I am only commenting on one piont. It is a legal requirement, The CBA highlights that Clubs must operate under OH&S rules and regulations as per there respected States, therefore we are talking about Worksafe SA and there return to work rules. and I believe only a medical practitioner is authorised to clear a person to return to work.

However in the Football world sometimes an injury is not what would be classed as an injury but may be reported as soreness. Not trying to be smart but there is a misconception out there that players who complain about soreness are classed as injured when they are not. I do not know if this was the case with MeGovern.

It also common sense you don't pay for a medical team and not used them to clear players for the game.
 
Without getting into a bullshit argument, and I am only commenting on one piont. It is a legal requirement, The CBA highlights that Clubs must operate under OH&S rules and regulations as per there respected States, therefore we are talking about Worksafe SA and there return to work rules. and I believe only a medical practitioner is authorised to clear a person to return to work.

However in the Football world sometimes an injury is not what would be classed as an injury but may be reported as soreness. Not trying to be smart but there is a misconception out there that players who complain about soreness are classed as injured when they are not. I do not know if this was the case with MeGovern.

It also common sense you don't pay for a medical team and not used them to clear players for the game.
I see your "soreness", and raise you with "awareness".
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top