Recommitted Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera - two year extension

[Buget]

Still think the logical outcome is he signs for two years at Saints.

This gives Port two years to get their ducks in a row and accommodate a reasonable trade.

Otherwise hard to see how Port scramble a deal together that is feasible?

On a side point, if he re-signs, will he be a free agent in 2 years? I’m guessing a restricted free agent if that’s a thing still .

 

[BrutThough]

On a side point, if he re-signs, will he be a free agent in 2 years? I’m guessing a restricted free agent if that’s a thing still .

4 years away

 

[BluesBusiness1991]

100 percent gone in my books. That presser from Friday night all but confirmed it. Not sure what’s changed over the Saturday for Saints fans. Enjoy overpaying TDK.

 

[Pencil case]

Butters is over rated.

Nas easily worth more than Butters over the next decade.

Butters has reached his ceiling already.

Butters is probably the third best player in the comp behind Bont and Ed Richards

 

[Pencil case]

All I’ve taken from this thread is remembering how much I hate the player and agent power in AFL. Saints should be fairly compensated for such a good player and it’s ridiculous that they’ll probably end up with a couple shitty firsts and low end fringe player(s). People have issues with FS and Academy or whatever, frankly I take more an issue with this crap.

Most clubs trade in good faith, that’s why Geelong are on a lot of clubs ban list to deal with.

 

[Pure_Ownage]

Or Port Adelaide will have to find a way to get picks off another team to satisfy St Kilda.

No They dont have to. The alternative is he walks and st kilda get nothing.

 

[Pure_Ownage]

On a side point, if he re-signs, will he be a free agent in 2 years? I’m guessing a restricted free agent if that’s a thing still .

No not FA til 8 years.

 

[WillHayward]

No They dont have to. The alternative is he walks and st kilda get nothing.

Thats not an alternative

 

[The_Reaper]

No They dont have to. The alternative is he walks and st kilda get nothing.

And neither do Port Adelaide?

 

[txbyhull]

No They dont have to. The alternative is he walks and st kilda get nothing.

If he went to the draft he wouldn’t make it to Port lol

 

[Cleric]

This isn't bay 13.

I know, this is.

Mega Thread - Port Forum General AFL Thread Part 30

Any team but the crows winning would satisfy me.

www.bigfooty.com

 

[Saints43]

100 percent gone in my books. That presser from Friday night all but confirmed it. Not sure what’s changed over the Saturday for Saints fans. Enjoy overpaying TDK.

Nas will stay. We'll have TDK.
Cheers.

 

[Cleric]

And neither do Port Adelaide?

Its called cutting your nose off despite your face. Port dont lose anything. They keep their picks and don't lose a player. St Kilda on the other hand lose their best player for nothing.
Which one is the worst outcome?

 

[Senor M]

Its called cutting your nose off despite your face. Port dont lose anything. They keep their picks and don't lose a player. St Kilda on the other hand lose their best player for nothing.
Which one is the worst outcome?

In the long term—- Port Adelaide.

They become a club known for being unable to facilitate a trade, they become known as promising a kid the world but not delivering on the deal.

It’s a bigger picture than just NAS at play.

 

[txbyhull]

Its called cutting your nose off despite your face. Port dont lose anything. They keep their picks and don't lose a player. St Kilda on the other hand lose their best player for nothing.
Which one is the worst outcome?

I thought the saying was cut your nose off to spite your face? Have I been saying it wrong my entire life

 

[Cleric]

In the long term—- Port Adelaide.

They become a club known for being unable to facilitate a trade, they become known as promising a kid the world but not delivering on the deal.

It’s a bigger picture than just NAS at play.

Or, St Kilda look like a club that cant get a deal done and lose their best player for nothing. Player managers would warn their players from going there.
Port have lost nothing. You cant lose something you never had.
St Kilda lose their best player for nothing, destroy the future prospects moving forward, and end up at the bottom for a decade.
Not to mention the supporter backlash.

 

[bomberclifford]

And neither do Port Adelaide?

Yes, but Port don’t lose anything. Saints do.

 

[bomberclifford]

I know, this is.

Mega Thread - Port Forum General AFL Thread Part 30

Any team but the crows winning would satisfy me.

www.bigfooty.com

Not a fan of knock-off, mid-century architecture?

 

[bigman]

No no no mate he was just getting ice cream with his friends. He actually didn’t realise they played for Port at the time!

I’ve heard he loves living with his St Kilda best friends and wants to play 400 games at 12-15th on the ladder!!

Bit rich given your form, no?

 

[bomberclifford]

In the long term—- Port Adelaide.

They become a club known for being unable to facilitate a trade, they become known as promising a kid the world but not delivering on the deal.

It’s a bigger picture than just NAS at play.

You mean apart from all those other times we were able to facilitate a trade?

If he chooses Port, and I’m not convinced he will at this point, then a trade will happen. The only way he ends up in the draft is if Saints play hard ball which, I will add, is an entirely legitimate tactic for them.

The implication of the draft works for both sides of the negotiations.

 

[Crowstar]

Deciding between Port and Crows is the same as deciding to drive a Holden Gemini or an Audi R8.
Nasiah is all class just like the Adelaide R8s.

 

[JUSTWORK]

Thats not an alternative

If Nas refuses to sign an extension and Saints wont trade him, it's the only alternative

 

[CHBench]

The relationship between the club, player and manager would have to be pretty rotten for PSD threats, and I just don't see that happening with a guy like Nasiah

It would be a massive failure of his management too if he can't guide his player through to the preferred destination - so multiples parties have something to lose by going with the PSD threat

 

[WillHayward]

Surely Bergman has to be on the table?
Surely?

 

[WillHayward]

If Nas refuses to sign an extension and Saints wont trade him, it's the only alternative

No but its actually not
AFL wont allow it
A deal will be made come hell or high-water