On the way home from the match, I was interested to hear Browny named in the worst 3 (MMM best 3/worst 3). Might have been Spud Frawley judging. He based this on Nate gathering only 3 possessions and how much added pressure this creates for your fellow backs.
Nate's obviously a stopper - much in the Presti mould - and I've never thought this to be a problem. I'll always remember the brilliant job Nate did on Riewaldt in GF2. (I reckon Spud was talking him up that day.)
So would Bucks be happy with pure stoppage, or given Nate's pace and relative athleticism, would Buck's want more?
Nate's obviously a stopper - much in the Presti mould - and I've never thought this to be a problem. I'll always remember the brilliant job Nate did on Riewaldt in GF2. (I reckon Spud was talking him up that day.)
So would Bucks be happy with pure stoppage, or given Nate's pace and relative athleticism, would Buck's want more?










