National Draft

[doodle48]

What order are our picks in the National Draft?

 

[Campbell's Chunky]

10, 27, 30, 38, 59, 75

 

[Mcleod_Nine]

They are pretty shocking draft picks
10 is good
then 27 is average and after that we wont get much at all

 

[doodle48]

Thanks

 

[Cap]

They are pretty shocking draft picks
10 is good
then 27 is average and after that we wont get much at all

yes we have never got anything of value after pick 27

 

[BlackDouglas]

10, 27, 30, 38, 59, 75

We will potentially get 4 good players with our first 4 selections. 57 could be used on Jessie Aish and 75 on Walker.

Little bit disheartening that the WB didn’t cough up pick 22 for Hudson but pick 30 is better than nothing.

Going by past selections we have a greater chance at picking a dud up at pick 10 than we do of having a dud 75.

 

[bus24]

Going by past selections we have a greater chance at picking a dud up at pick 10 than we do of having a dud 75.

No duds at 75 this year

 

[crowugoodthing]

Personally I don't think we will use pick 75. Can't see Craigy making the call to drop three more players off our list. Hope I'm wrong though.

 

[KUNG FU]

The AFL site has us with #22 for Hudson

http://www.afl.com.au/Default.aspx?tabid=208&newsId=52332

EDIT: Clearly stuffed it, cos they give them to WCE on the next trade

 

[AdelUniCrowFan]

Here are the picks for the 2 Adelaide teams.

Port have two picks amongst Adelaide's 3 picks from 27-38, so if they are looking local it might spoil a couple of Adelaide's choices.

10. Adelaide
16. Port Adelaide
27. Adelaide
28. Port Adelaide
30. Adelaide
33. Port Adelaide
38. Adelaide
49. Port Adelaide
59. Adelaide
65. Port Adelaide
75. Adelaide
...

 

[BunjiMac]

Personally I don't think we will use pick 75. Can't see Craigy making the call to drop three more players off our list. Hope I'm wrong though.

Hope you're wrong too!!

Perrie and Doughty are surely gone.

Bode and Hinge maybe should be gone

and Torney hasn't resigned from what i understand??

Then theres massie, who I'm not sure would get a game now that we have symes and pfeifer coming up

 

[BunjiMac]

Where do people think Patrenko will go?

 

[IddyBiddy]

Here are the picks for the 2 Adelaide teams.

Port have two picks amongst Adelaide's 3 picks from 27-38, so if they are looking local it might spoil a couple of Adelaide's choices.

10. Adelaide
16. Port Adelaide
27. Adelaide
28. Port Adelaide
30. Adelaide
33. Port Adelaide
38. Adelaide
49. Port Adelaide
59. Adelaide
65. Port Adelaide
75. Adelaide
...

Adelaide's picks are all prior to Ports, our destiny will be in our own hands.

 

[crowugoodthing]

Hope you're wrong too!!

Perrie and Doughty are surely gone.

Bode and Hinge maybe should be gone

and Torney hasn't resigned from what i understand??

Then theres massie, who I'm not sure would get a game now that we have symes and pfeifer coming up

Perrie - gone (well one would hope so)
Doughty - contract for next year

Bode, Hinge, Torney, Jericho, Pheiffer - I think these are the remaining out of contract players. Therefore 2 of these will have to go to get to pick 75. I see Hinge being let go but will Craigy make the hard call on Bode or Torney??? History would tell us he will not.

 

[swanfan]

yes we have never got anything of value after pick 27

Graham Johncock.

 

[BunjiMac]

Perrie - gone (well one would hope so)
Doughty - contract for next year

Bode, Hinge, Torney, Jericho, Pheiffer - I think these are the remaining out of contract players. Therefore 2 of these will have to go to get to pick 75. I see Hinge being let go but will Craigy make the hard call on Bode or Torney??? History would tell us he will not.

Surely wed keep Pheiffer ??

 

[mymansyd]

Perrie - gone (well one would hope so)
Doughty - contract for next year

Bode, Hinge, Torney, Jericho, Pheiffer - I think these are the remaining out of contract players. Therefore 2 of these will have to go to get to pick 75. I see Hinge being let go but will Craigy make the hard call on Bode or Torney??? History would tell us he will not.

Should go-: Jericho, Perrie, Hinge and Doughty (don't care if he's contracted; just pay him out - would rather have a kid on the list).

In danger-: Bode and Massie.

 

[BunjiMac]

Doesn anyone know whether theres a report out on the draft camp??

 

[johnnypanther]

We will potentially get 4 good players with our first 4 selections. 57 could be used on Jessie Aish and 75 on Walker.

Little bit disheartening that the WB didn’t cough up pick 22 for Hudson but pick 30 is better than nothing.

Going by past selections we have a greater chance at picking a dud up at pick 10 than we do of having a dud 75.

no thanks - there's heaps of players better than Aish at 57 (or 107 )

lets get over this fixation of somebody with a famous surname and judge them purely on merit

 

[Jars458]

In danger-:e and Massie.

Not in the known universe is Massie in danger.

 

[-VC-]

no thanks - there's heaps of players better than Aish at 57 (or 107 )

lets get over this fixation of somebody with a famous surname and judge them purely on merit

Besides F/S candidates were nominated a week ago. It doesn't mean we can't take him now, but it does signal our intention - or lack thereof.

 

[finn]

Besides F/S candidates were nominated a week ago. It doesn't mean we can't take him now, but it does signal our intention - or lack thereof.

reid was talking about the rookie draft for aish during that same interview.

 

[TheLeftFist8]

Should go-: Jericho, Perrie, Hinge and Doughty (don't care if he's contracted; just pay him out - would rather have a kid on the list).

In danger-: Bode and Massie.

SPOT ON. I cannot understand all this 'he must be kept, he is contracted' talk. He only has to be paid, we have heaps of salary cap space. Surely after Perrie he is next to go.

After Perrie and Doughty, let's find 1-2 more out of Torney, Bode, Hinge.

 

[macca23]

Besides F/S candidates were nominated a week ago. It doesn't mean we can't take him now, but it does signal our intention - or lack thereof.

Not necessarily so.

Reid was talking about that on 5AA and he said that they didn't take Aish with the father/son in case there was a bidding war and they had to use a lower round pick than they would like to.

It almost gave the impression that if Aish was still there in the 4th or 5th round that they just might take him, so I wouldn't necessarily rule Aish out of calculations at all - but only for a very high round pick.

 

[BlackDouglas]

no thanks - there's heaps of players better than Aish at 57 (or 107 )

lets get over this fixation of somebody with a famous surname and judge them purely on merit

Your right I just read somewhere that it may possibly happen and it just stuck in my head.