- Joined
- Aug 26, 2004
- Posts
- 110,642
- Reaction score
- 225,186
- Location
- CHANEL BOUTIQUE!
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
"Goddess"

- Staff
- #26
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

WB v SYD · RIC v MEL · HAW v GCS · ESS v COL · PA v GEE · FRE v CAR · StK v WCE · BL v ADE · GWS v NM ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
"Goddess"

Simple answer is no.
It worked against Collingwood last year and it worked in this final but that just won't be the norm.
Applaud the guy for yesterday but even in his interview, he just seemed like a man on the outer. Did anyone else pick this up?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Not hard to come up with 6-8 players to be delisted before Duigan. One tough hombre, would have liked to see him play many more games this year.
Simple answer is no.
It worked against Collingwood last year and it worked in this final but that just won't be the norm.
Applaud the guy for yesterday but even in his interview, he just seemed like a man on the outer. Did anyone else pick this up?
You play these types of guys in finals. Doesn't take a backward step. Hard as nails and plays for his teammates. He will be invaluable against the swans.
Not everyone has the skills and natural ability of yarren but it takes all types to win a game of footy.
But each mo is so different. Duigs' is more in the mold of the Musketeers, whereas, Micks is......err......hmmmm....how would you describe it??perhaps he grew the mo in a thinly veiled attempt to enamour himself to Mick
As the sun sets on Nick Duigan's CFC (and presumably AFL) career, it's worth reflecting on how the (supposed) ultra-professional, strategic, highly-structured systems of AFL clubs, wind up coaching the life out of some players.Duigan doesn't have... the running rebound capability or long kicking ability that is required of defenders. ...
You don't think he was given this role?As the sun sets on Nick Duigan's CFC (and presumably AFL) career, it's worth reflecting on how the (supposed) ultra-professional, strategic, highly-structured systems of AFL clubs, wind up coaching the life out of some players.
Nick Duigan is the probably the best state league running rebound defender that I've ever seen. A classic big-intercept-mark-and-take-'em-on, 70–75 metre player. It's that ability, that got him drafted into the AFL system in the first place. A shame that 'team structure' meant that AFL fans saw so little of him doing what he did best.
As the sun sets on Nick Duigan's CFC (and presumably AFL) career, it's worth reflecting on how the (supposed) ultra-professional, strategic, highly-structured systems of AFL clubs, wind up coaching the life out of some players.
Nick Duigan is the probably the best state league running rebound defender that I've ever seen. A classic big-intercept-mark-and-take-'em-on, 70–75 metre player. It's that ability, that got him drafted into the AFL system in the first place. A shame that 'team structure' meant that AFL fans saw so little of him doing what he did best.
Obviously never went near it in 2013. But in 2011/12 I just thought that he took too many intercepted grabs where there was a gap open, and then meekly went back behind the mark and looked for the next chip up, or other low-risk option. I wouldn't believe that he was overawed at playing at the next level up, and so the only rational explanation I could think of is that he was following an instruction based on team structure/strategy. Obviously you watched Carlton more and closer than I did in that time, so happy to be told that I'm wrong and he did take 'em on back then.You don't think he was given this role?