RandB
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2007
- Posts
- 17,083
- Reaction score
- 13,637
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- MUFC Norwood
There's no doubt this has been a massive factor and the longer it has gone on and the smaller the senior playing group has got, the less tenable this approach has become.His fixation with "development" and "getting games into the kids" would have frustrated the sh#t out of the senior players.
The first 3 years I supported what Bailey (and the club) was doing but to continue our narrow sighted approach in to 2011 was a bridge too far, senior players finally got jack of it and it caught up with us in the end.
IMO the psyche of the senior group has been damaged regardless of individual performances which may or may not be excusable and the level of ability that they have.
Tinkering, trialling, developing, experimenting - when does it all end and we get on with things? Bailey essentially has sent a message, I'm going to stuff around with this group and you guys carry us and make us look less bad.
Meanwhile practically every other team (which is ironically developing as well if not quicker than us) us out there optimised for success.
When a team runs across the white line, as a coach you make sure that they are prepared in the best way possible to perform against any given opposition. To do anything else saps a team of their venom and competitive nature and reduces them to a WIP that is going through the motions and embarrasing itself on the national stage.
We also lost sight of our product. Perhaps if Bailey took ownership of what was happening on the field (particularly this year and last year) and saw it as a reflection of his management things may have been different.
Dean Bailey is a very smart man. Early on in his tenure he found a way to distance himself from our poor performances. The first thing he hid behind was our process. Given our new direction this was acceptable early on.
At stages last year when we were copping beltings he stated that we need to get games into Scully and Trengove. In essence he hid behind them too and put a world of pressure on them in the process - not to mention send a message to the rest of the playing group STFU we aren't worried about you.
The third group he hid behind was the ever dwindling senior group.
Never, ever untill bloodbath Saturday did he finally twig that maybe just maybe this is a reflection on him as a coach.
There is an old adage: you get out of something that you put into it and Bailey (fairly or unfairly) was bitten on the arse.
At some point we took our eye of the ball and forgot what was important, what galvanised a team and a club - win at all costs. The biggest irony of all is that rather than helping our younger recruits, our narrow approach could have potentially damaged them. They weren't being indoctrined into an AFL club, we essentially became a youth drop-in centre.
To win a game of AFL football you need a strategy, you need tactics, you need your best players, you need a gameplan, you need physicality and endurance, you need goal congruence and most importantly you need players who run onto the field knowing that they can win and that everyone is collectively switched on.
Without this you have systematic capitulation and there is no amount of venting over Green's "antics", Sylvia's "consistency", Rivers' "disposal/accountability", Davey's "softness" etc that will change this. Yes some of them have under performed, yes some of them are not the most talented but it is only an aspect of our problems not the root of them.
I hope in our last 5 games Viney takes us as a collective back to the fundamental principles of competitive sport. God knows we need this drilled into the entire group leading up to pre-season.
No matter how good or shit the gameplan is just give them one FFS.








