eth-dog
Tier 1 WW Player
Canberra should be team 20 but that looks unlikely. Port should have been the first Adelaide team and then Norwood when Port came in tbf.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
I'm unconvinced of the merits of doing this at this time.
Homelessness is at an all time high in Tassie. How many families could they house with $240 million?
Sicily is an idiot given he plays for Hawthorn who have had sponsorship from Tassie for years. He may well have spoken how he feels but bad thing to see from captain of a club that plays there and gets sponsorship etc.Whatley has been a real dick about Tasmania.
Last night he called for public shaming of any of the presidents who do not agree with the 19th licence. It must be a unanimous decision, he says. What a load s**t.
Now I read that Sicily has felt the need to walk back perfectly valid comments about player retention.
I can't help but think of all of the trouble Gold Coast has had retaining players. That is going to be intensified by degrees of magnitude in Hobart (pun intended).
I am also not quite sure how we're capturing the Adelaide Oval precinct with that new development on the foreshore either. You're not playing night games there, not in winter. It would be Arctic. That means day matches essentially competing with local footy.
I'll be rooting for a Tassie side but I smell a rat when all we're allowed to acknowledge is the positives and the "justice" of the situation. If we're not allowed to address the negatives why am I supposed to believe they have been properly considered as part of the business case? Or do we just have to accept they have been considered and dismissed by the party with an interest in dismissal of the negatives?
They’ve got to get a 20th team within 2-3 years following tassie. Having a 19th brings no extra income to the game and 20th you get the 10th game and so that extra money in revenue that helps funds that expansion. The smart move imo would be to put another team in SA or WA, preferably SA - and imo I’d look at getting another sanfl side in that has the business case to make them viable. You automatically get their whole supporter base and facilities, plus you’re playing out of Adelaide oval so no need for stadium facilities. Plus you can get 2 home games a year that will automatically be sold out against the crows and port.The thinking going around Twitter at the moment is that with Tassie getting announced and having a 2027 entry date, a 20th team announcement with a 2028 entry date might be on the cards at some point. With the 20th team being a 3rd one in WA or SA. Basically, do it like they did Gold Coast and GWS coming in, where there's only one year with an odd number of teams.
Nothing confirmed or anything like that, but it does make a lot of sense. We'll see how it all plays out!
That’s the issue there is very minimal top level Tasmania kids every year. Grassroots footy in Tasmania is a huge issue, and the pathway is atrocious. Step 1 before you even get the team going to is to do what Eddie said, fix grassroots footy and set up a Tasmanian academy pathway to find more elite talent in their state. And Tasmania get access to any of the talent available, like what happens in the northern states. This has to happen within the next 12 months. You cant wait 4-5 years as to when the team gets up and running, as you’ll have to wait half a decade to see any of the results of the academy.If the Tassie facilities are way better than the GWS and SUNS had on start up that's a big advantage
Target VIC and TAS kids in the draft.
If you haven't lived in Tassie (bogan central Eddie and Sicily) don't comment
They’ve got to get a 20th team within 2-3 years following tassie. Having a 19th brings no extra income to the game and 20th you get the 10th game and so that extra money in revenue that helps funds that expansion. The smart move imo would be to put another team in SA or WA, preferably SA - and imo I’d look at getting another sanfl side in that has the business case to make them viable. You automatically get their whole supporter base and facilities, plus you’re playing out of Adelaide oval so no need for stadium facilities. Plus you can get 2 home games a year that will automatically be sold out against the crows and port.
Cairns is an interesting one for me. Pretty good AFL presence up there and definitely not just NRL. Also undergoing massive growth with all the Victorians having moved during and post COVID. don’t think it will happen but it’s an outlier.
Sicily is an idiot given he plays for Hawthorn who have had sponsorship from Tassie for years. He may well have spoken how he feels but bad thing to see from captain of a club that plays there and gets sponsorship etc.
Personally I'd rather live on the GC than Brisbane (or Tassie). The Suns player retention issues are more about the club than the location I would have thought. Giants have had retention issues too although that seems more salary cap driven. And I guess when it became apparent that a premiership wasnt going to happen despite the draft concessions, then time to move on.
I don't mind there being a Tassie team but it doesnt make much sense to me unless there is a pathway to there being a 20th team (or another team folding eg Saints or Norf - I am not wishing that on them just noting those are the 2 most obvious).
The cost of propping up Tassie when Suns and Giants are not successful (+ a potential 20th team?) is a big concern.
Yeh a team in wa would likely have to be brand new founded. But at same time would be hard to develop a supporter base with the power for west coast.A third team might make sense in SA, at least because I think Adelaide had connections to SANFL clubs and then there is Port.
But I can't seen it working in WA/Perth. The teams are divided culturally and even geographically. Maybe someone with more recent info on the footy in WA has a better insight but I see absolutely no scope for a 3rd team in WA. I see no way it could be relevant.
Joondalup Falcons. Pretty simple.Yeh a team in wa would likely have to be brand new founded. But at same time would be hard to develop a supporter base with the power for west coast.
Will you leave us?Joondalup Falcons. Pretty simple.
Not sure why it's a no brainer SA gets a 3rd team before WA. Who wants more tarps.
Norfern Territory KangaroosDarwin Crocodiles?
Nah. I missed my chance when Freo came in and again when the league didn't revoke our licence. I'm more interested in further diluting The West Coast's supporter/talent pool now.Will you leave us?
can't imagine even the most diehard west coast supporter could stand what's happened to the team nowNah. I missed my chance when Freo came in and again when the league didn't revoke our licence. I'm more interested in further diluting The West Coast's supporter/talent pool now.
If you look at my originally comment I said either WA/SA. You think a new WA would get more than 30k regularly to home games at Optus regardless?Joondalup Falcons. Pretty simple.
Not sure why it's a no brainer SA gets a 3rd team before WA. Who wants more tarps.