jmoo wan
Formally, Mr Jmoo Wan
unless you hide in your house and don’t answer the door like Hooker, one must assume one is open to a tradeWasnt it that Shiel didnt want to do the deal?
Or am i thinking of some other trade
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BL v StK · WB v FRE · RIC v HAW · ADE v SYD · NM v COL · GWS v PA ·
Read the wrap-up and post your "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
unless you hide in your house and don’t answer the door like Hooker, one must assume one is open to a tradeWasnt it that Shiel didnt want to do the deal?
Or am i thinking of some other trade
They do not play away. In fact they should stop bringing it up as an issue publicly. Gives the players an easy out and creates a soft culture.Looks like the Harley Reid effect has worn off for WC.
They have patched up a few of the defensive issues plus a few guys are finding some form after a slow start.2 points and 10 seconds from 4 in a row since the latest time Mitchell became the worst bloke in the world.
he was probably carrying for someone elseGreat to see Bomber Thompson at the Cats game, he was sitting with Selwood and Stevie J and looked really happy and content.
I think the issue is now the tackler can't bring the player to ground without serious risk of coming under scrutiny should any number of variables result in the head hitting the ground. What were good tackles are now dangerous tackles so players hang onto the ball since they have a fair idea they won't be slung to the ground nor likely to get pinged by the umps.Is it just me or is anyone else baffled by how much the interpretation of holding the ball is being brought up by coaches/media at the moment?
This has been the way for 5 or so years since the AFL powers that be became obsessed with reducing congestion and increasing scoring. Theyve instructed umps to give players as much time as possible to dispose of the ball, the old 360° interpretation for reasonable time to dispose of the footy doesnt exist now and they have been lenient on throws for a number of years too.
I used to get worked up about this but now have become so used to it that I dont care anymore. Has it really got worse this season?
Anyway the petty side of me gets really annoyed hearing buckley and Pendlebury go on about it in the media considering how our fanbase were lectured after the 2019 ANZAC day match which had a number of contentious non calls for holding the ball.
I think the issue is now the tackler can't bring the player to ground without serious risk of coming under scrutiny should any number of variables result in the head hitting the ground. What were good tackles are now dangerous tackles so players hang onto the ball since they gave a fair idea they won't be slung to the ground nor likely to get pinged by the umps.
The amount of time Curnow had possession when Mac Andrew caught him cold on the weekend was ridiculous. Something has to be done to find a more effective middle ground. If the tackler isn't rewarded, why bother tackling?This, giving them a lifetime to dispose of it meant tacklers had to find new and more aggressive ways of bringing players to ground. That twisting motion can become a sling, or trap the ankle / knee.
Owen and pweter make good points but is the curnow tackle any worse than this one from two years ago. No one questioned the non call in the commentary box and it was celebrated as a great tackle break.The amount of time Curnow had possession when Mac Andrew caught him cold on the weekend was ridiculous. Something has to be done to find a more effective middle ground. If the tackler isn't rewarded, why bother tackling?
should a tackler be rewarded for only tackling the arm and not being able to prevent the player from legally disposing of the ball? (and it never looked like Curnow would be prevented from kicking the ball)
I think there should be some time given for a tackler to break through, its pretty exciting to see guys like stringer/danger etc use their power to break through a tackle. But its tipped too far the other way last few years and doesnt pass the pub test. The cumberland vid above is ridiculous, he was spun 360, brought to ground and then gets back up to kick a goal.I really feel the onus here should be with the umpiring (not umpires) of the game.
Like NFL - if you get the ball and make a football action, then it's live and if you are tackled it's HTB.
They can make decisions that could avoid injuries.
this isn't really the rule though is it? anyone can dispose any ball if they get long enough.(and it never looked like Curnow would be prevented from kicking the ball)
this isn't really the rule though is it? anyone can dispose any ball if they get long enough.
the question is what we consider 'tackled' and what we don't.
North, Saints or Dogs?National reserves comp may be back on the agenda . 17/18 clubs wanting it . Tom Morris running with it.
It has been bubbling along in the back ground for a while. If Covid did not happen I suspect we would already have one.
RIP the VFLNational reserves comp may be back on the agenda . 17/18 clubs wanting it . Tom Morris running with it.
It has been bubbling along in the back ground for a while. If Covid did not happen I suspect we would already have one.
Do you not think an 8 or so club league could work? I would've thought it'd actually be better - would give the clubs back their identity.RIP the VFL
Agree. In real time Curnow had an eternity. It seemed like the umpires decided he would break the tackle eventually and gave him the time needed. He was caught, dead set.this isn't really the rule though is it? anyone can dispose any ball if they get long enough.
the question is what we consider 'tackled' and what we don't.
Unlike the WAFL and SANFL it isn't commercially viable. The support isn't there. They're going to struggle to survive.Do you not think an 8 or so club league could work? I would've thought it'd actually be better - would give the clubs back their identity.
Corporate support you mean? The clubs should survive, if it's worth them surviving they will. Just at what level remains to be seen.Unlike the WAFL and SANFL it isn't commercially viable. The support isn't there. They're going to struggle to survive.