If only Powell-Pepper had a decent boot, kicking at 30% today apparently.
Wont last till 19?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 7
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
If only Powell-Pepper had a decent boot, kicking at 30% today apparently.
Probably the same as they did with Fletcher for 20 yearsCompletely different frame to Parish. But I still wonder what our strength and condition is doing with Gleeson and Ashby
![]()
Hard to tell really as there's still plenty of time for every kid to shine.Wont last till 19?
Fair to say Fletcher is one of a kind.Probably the same as they did with Fletcher for 20 years
When you've worked out who in this years draft is like Dangerfield please give Dodoro a call, I'm sure he'd like to know.Gee that run by Danger was good need to draft some one like him.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
When you've worked out who in this years draft is like Dangerfield please give Dodoro a call, I'm sure he'd like to know.
Sydney?Geelong's flag to lose I reckon
I'd be ok with that. As long as it's not hawthorn. **** hawthorn.Geelong's flag to lose I reckon
Three horse race for the cup between Geelong, Sydney and GWS.
Just had a look at the ladder, if Freo knock off the Pies next week they'll send them into the bottom 4... [emoji23]
Also the Dogs are overrated.
It seems a lot more likely that the umpire said "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas ducked" than "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas is a ducker" - or even if they did say the latter, they were referring to Lindsay being a ducker on that occasion (which he was). When the message is being relayed by a frustrated North player, I could easily see it being misrepresented. Far more likely scenario than the umpire admitting to a North player that he won't pay another North player free kicks on the basis of his reputation.I think it was said. North would have received a phone call this morning, and now they have retracted their stance.
You are right about why too, if this came out as fact it would send umpiring back 40 years in regards to respect.
Note how many times Puopolo flies unrealistically just to put one or two defenders out of the contest. Definitely part of their ploy
It seems a lot more likely that the umpire said "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas ducked" than "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas is a ducker" - or even if they did say the latter, they were referring to Lindsay being a ducker on that occasion (which he was). When the message is being relayed by a frustrated North player, I could easily see it being misrepresented. Far more likely scenario than the umpire admitting to a North player that he won't pay another North player free kicks on the basis of his reputation.
Yeah good point. This seems the most logical out of everything.It seems a lot more likely that the umpire said "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas ducked" than "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas is a ducker" - or even if they did say the latter, they were referring to Lindsay being a ducker on that occasion (which he was). When the message is being relayed by a frustrated North player, I could easily see it being misrepresented. Far more likely scenario than the umpire admitting to a North player that he won't pay another North player free kicks on the basis of his reputation.
I think Parish is noticeably bigger now than when he was first drafted.It's not his frame. Parish is a stick Tucker is not.
I think Parish is noticeably bigger now than when he was first drafted.
#whateverittakesYep I think he's put on a bit if tissue quite quickly
