Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp Non-Essendon Thread X

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Completely different frame to Parish. But I still wonder what our strength and condition is doing with Gleeson and Ashby
2445160_orig.jpg
Probably the same as they did with Fletcher for 20 years
 
Gee that run by Danger was good need to draft some one like him.
When you've worked out who in this years draft is like Dangerfield please give Dodoro a call, I'm sure he'd like to know.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

I think it was said. North would have received a phone call this morning, and now they have retracted their stance.

You are right about why too, if this came out as fact it would send umpiring back 40 years in regards to respect.
It seems a lot more likely that the umpire said "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas ducked" than "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas is a ducker" - or even if they did say the latter, they were referring to Lindsay being a ducker on that occasion (which he was). When the message is being relayed by a frustrated North player, I could easily see it being misrepresented. Far more likely scenario than the umpire admitting to a North player that he won't pay another North player free kicks on the basis of his reputation.
 
Note how many times Puopolo flies unrealistically just to put one or two defenders out of the contest. Definitely part of their ploy

What's unrealistic ? Everytime I've seen Puopolo fly high he's got his hands to the ball.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Bulldogs were rubbish tonight - Their forward was non-existent, they handballed far too much in their congestion, and their forwards refused to lead up to the ball carrier - It's like I was watching Essendon 2016.
 
It seems a lot more likely that the umpire said "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas ducked" than "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas is a ducker" - or even if they did say the latter, they were referring to Lindsay being a ducker on that occasion (which he was). When the message is being relayed by a frustrated North player, I could easily see it being misrepresented. Far more likely scenario than the umpire admitting to a North player that he won't pay another North player free kicks on the basis of his reputation.

If Brad Scott doesn't cop a huge fine (bigger than Hirdys 20k 15years ago) it was said.
 
It seems a lot more likely that the umpire said "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas ducked" than "we didn't pay a free kick because Lindsay Thomas is a ducker" - or even if they did say the latter, they were referring to Lindsay being a ducker on that occasion (which he was). When the message is being relayed by a frustrated North player, I could easily see it being misrepresented. Far more likely scenario than the umpire admitting to a North player that he won't pay another North player free kicks on the basis of his reputation.
Yeah good point. This seems the most logical out of everything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom