Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio ?

[RogerRabbit69]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

How on earth did Mundy manage to get 6 votes

My guess is six Freo supporters visited this thread

 

[tomthetiger]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

More like 24, and 18 voted for Deledio even considering their bias

 

[Pav for AA]

Obviously large portions of this site are voting with bias as they would rather follow the propaganda of a few ferals. Its a sad day on Bigfooty.

Objectively, Who has performed at a higher more consistent level.

Honestly, Mundy is by far and away a more consistent performer, and his performance levels are high.

Disturbing watching this unfold.

Mundy > Deledio, you know this

 

[Richo83]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Obviously large portions of this site are voting with bias as they would rather follow the propaganda of a few ferals. Its a sad day on Bigfooty.

Objectively, Who has performed at a higher more consistent level.

Honestly, Mundy is by far and away a more consistent performer, and his performance levels are high.

Disturbing watching this unfold.

Mundy > Deledio, you know this

It's hilarious watching you trying to justify why close to 80% don't support your claim. You state that we are the ones that are biased, bigfooty's biggest PKB for a while.

Answer this: If Mundy is clearly better than Deledio, then why don't most of the posters on this site agree with you, seeing as it is so obvious as you claim? If it is so clear as you state, then why does Mundy only recieve 20% fo the votes? It seems like a classic case of pwnage. You made a claim and have been shot down in flames. It's okay, we make mistakes, but this continuous mistake is a bad one. You could've left it and moved on, but refused to. Pity.

BTW: Propaganda isn't the right word, knowledge and intelligence is a much more accurate description.

 

[numba4]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Consistant - Mundy
Potential - Delideo

Of course Delideo is going to stand out more he is a mid feilder in a sh*t team where Mundy is a Back is an average team, Mundy plays the same week in week out, Delideo has a few good games in a row then dies off for the next couple of games

 

[Richo83]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Consistant - Mundy
Potential - Delideo

Of course Delideo is going to stand out more he is a mid feilder in a sh*t team where Mundy is a Back is an average team, Mundy plays the same week in week out, Delideo has a few good games in a row then dies off for the next couple of games

Which explains why Deledio won the NAB rising star while Mundy didn't.

 

[Pav for AA]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Consistant - Mundy
Potential - Delideo

Of course Delideo is going to stand out more he is a mid feilder in a sh*t team where Mundy is a Back is an average team, Mundy plays the same week in week out, Delideo has a few good games in a row then dies off for the next couple of games

If I wanted to know who had more potential I would have started a who has more potential thread. I didnt it is a "who has performed at a higher, more consistent level." thread.

Obviously potential and actual performance have been mixed up

 

[JuddyisGod]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

If I wanted to know who had more potential I would have started a who has more potential thread. I didnt it is a "who has performed at a higher, more consistent level." thread.

Obviously potential and actual performance have been mixed up

lol, just keep twisting it Pav so everyone agrees with you.

I found it ironic you used the word objective in your thread title when your are one of the most subjective posters on BF, and your inability to accept most other people's opinions that Deledio is better than Mundy only adds to my claims of subjectivity on your behalf.

 

[Cerpin Taxt]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Two questions there. Higher or more consistent.

Higher: Deledio
More consistent: Mundy

Greater quantity of outstanding games (thus consistency at a higher level): Deledio

 

[Richo83]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

If I wanted to know who had more potential I would have started a who has more potential thread. I didnt it is a "who has performed at a higher, more consistent level." thread.

If you wanted to create a thread on who has the most potential, Deledio or Mundy, you should have done that. But you didn't. Plus, Deledio would have won the poll on who has the most potential anyway, since Deledio is younger, yet is just as good, if not better than Mundy. Deledio has more time and space to improve.

Obviously potential and actual performance have been mixed up

You get alot of things mixed up, don't you? Deledio is better than Mundy in both actual performance and potential.

 

[Pav for AA]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

If you wanted to create a thread on who has the most potential, Deledio or Mundy, you should have done that. But you didn't. Plus, Deledio would have won the poll on who has the most potential anyway, since Deledio is younger, yet is just as good, if not better than Mundy. Deledio has more time and space to improve.



You get alot of things mixed up, don't you? Deledio is better than Mundy in both actual performance and potential.

Really, is that so? Or would you just like to believe that?

http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=112&pid2=2005090

I think its the latter

 

[Heisenberg_]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Really, is that so? Or would you just like to believe that?

http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=112&pid2=2005090

I think its the latter

did you even read the stats, because they are fairly even and probably a little bit in favour towards Deledio. And if Mundy was so much better, would he be ****ting all over Deledio since he is a third year player and Deledio only second year.
Deledio>>Mundy

 

[Truth Personified]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

did you even read the stats, because they are fairly even and probably a little bit in favour towards Deledio. And if Mundy was so much better, would he be ****ting all over Deledio since he is a third year player and Deledio only second year.
Deledio>>Mundy

How exactly do they favour Deledio, It seems that Mundy is ahead in most stats? And Mundy, in essence is a second year player also, he never played AFL in his first year on the list.

 

[Punt_Road_Roar]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

How exactly do they favour Deledio, It seems that Mundy is ahead in most stats? And Mundy, in essence is a second year player also, he never played AFL in his first year on the list.

Thats because its David Who v Brett Deledio

 

[andypie]

deledio by the length of the straight.
no contest.

 

[andypie]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

How exactly do they favour Deledio, It seems that Mundy is ahead in most stats? And Mundy, in essence is a second year player also, he never played AFL in his first year on the list.

stats are a blight on the game and totally irrelevant in modern footy. you can read anything you want into stats in order to make your point. it's all about impact on the game that counts.
eg. neitz v collingwood queens birthday, from memory only had about 8 kicks, kicked 3 goals. but because of his impact on the game he was in the best 3 for mine.

 

[Truth Personified]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

stats are a blight on the game and totally irrelevant in modern footy. you can read anything you want into stats in order to make your point. it's all about impact on the game that counts.
eg. neitz v collingwood queens birthday, from memory only had about 8 kicks, kicked 3 goals. but because of his impact on the game he was in the best 3 for mine.

Definitely. Then why arent people voting in such a manner. I dont think Deledio has done anything to alter a games course save for the Adelaide game which was as much as an effort from the team than an individual standout performance.

 

[Richo83]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Definitely. Then why arent people voting in such a manner. I dont think Deledio has done anything to alter a games course save for the Adelaide game which was as much as an effort from the team than an individual standout performance.

In many games last year such as against the hawks he influened the game so we won.

 

[Kirke Special]

Im not sure of the time frame, but if it were for this year, Mundy has been very good. Over the course of the two years then its neck and neck, maybe in Deledio's favour, but very close.

 

[Burnzy]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

I think I know another reason Deledio is kicking arse in this poll (apart from the fact he's a gun).

Pav for AA has been totally obsessed with this whole Mundy/Deledio comparison for time immemorial. The average Bigfooty poster sees a poll with 'Mundy' and 'Deledio' in the title, and 'Pav for AA' as the creator and thinks, "here we go again."

Pav for AA, Aristotle highlighted three parts of rhetorical persuasion that are essential in forming a strong argument. They were logos (logic) pathos (emotional appeal) and ethos (credibility of the speaker). Your ethos is really what lets u down (although the other two are hardly any better). Everyone knows you've got a hang up about this, so ironically the harder you argue your case, the more people will disagree with you.

At first I thought it was an attempted troll, but you've taken on the characteristics of a broken record and it's time to give it a rest. As a fellow freo supporter I call on Pav for AA to stop besmirching his namesake, as well as the rest of us. Many here will agree that David Mundy and Brett Deledio are both talented young players and most are willing to leave it at that.

Oh, and in other news, Emoticon stocks are up 20 cents due to Pav for AA's consistent abuse of the thumbs up.

 

[peterss]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Mundy for me.

 

[Grimreepah]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Good post Burnzy. Your ancient Greek reference was interesting and relevant. I hope Pav4AA takes your advice because it's boring listening to the same stupid thing over and over again.

 

[Richo83]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

I think I know another reason Deledio is kicking arse in this poll (apart from the fact he's a gun).

Pav for AA has been totally obsessed with this whole Mundy/Deledio comparison for time immemorial. The average Bigfooty poster sees a poll with 'Mundy' and 'Deledio' in the title, and 'Pav for AA' as the creator and thinks, "here we go again."

Pav for AA, Aristotle highlighted three parts of rhetorical persuasion that are essential in forming a strong argument. They were logos (logic) pathos (emotional appeal) and ethos (credibility of the speaker). Your ethos is really what lets u down (although the other two are hardly any better). Everyone knows you've got a hang up about this, so ironically the harder you argue your case, the more people will disagree with you.

At first I thought it was an attempted troll, but you've taken on the characteristics of a broken record and it's time to give it a rest. As a fellow freo supporter I call on Pav for AA to stop besmirching his namesake, as well as the rest of us. Many here will agree that David Mundy and Brett Deledio are both talented young players and most are willing to leave it at that.

Oh, and in other news, Emoticon stocks are up 20 cents due to Pav for AA's consistent abuse of the thumbs up.

Couldn't be more accuate. Pav4AA has little to no credibilty and no-one believes him. No matter how he tries, he fails because he doens't move on, and harps on about the same things, people get sick of it and abuse him. As grim said, the Greek reference was spot on. If Pav4AA contributed to the general disscussion about footy instead of constantly crapping on about how Mundy is better than Deledio, then maybe he woulnd't be so hated.

If only all freo fans were as smart as you.

 

[Pav for AA]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Mundy for me.

Common Sense, Did Scott West mention Deledio on the Footy Show last night, I could have sworn he said he wasnt coping under the strain of a tag, Im pretty sure one Beacon of truth May have said this last year.

Oh, that was me, I was the one who said he wont be able to cope under the rigours of a tag.

Now if Scott West Can identify Deledio as Struggling why cant he rest of you? One of the games best has come out and said exactly what I said last year, surely the lot of you may reconsider your position on this matter.

Otherwise you're all bias Cretins

 

[Richo83]

Re: Objectively, who has performed at a higher, more consisten Level Mundy or Deledio

Pav for AA:

If you watched the footy show, you would realise that West said that Deledio has had to cope with a tag and he has had to deal with it, just like all good midfielders. However, Deledio is doing alright for a 19 year old who is constantly targetted.

He is 19 FFS! He is doing very well for a 19 year old coping with being tagged every week.

He didn't say hewas struggling, it's just that he has had to fight off a tag every week. Look at the stats, he has done pretty well this year.

You, calling others cretins, height of hypocrisy. Also, dn't call people cretins. You are not Sam Newman and it's just offensive and will turn people against you. Oh wait, that happens anyway.