Remove this Banner Ad

Injury Our Injury List

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

That’s correct, but it doesn’t change the fact that what he said was very very incorrect, hence my response.

Which has nothing to do with what’s going on now.


Well I have no idea if that’s true or not but if it is, it’s probably a good thing that he’s our football boss and not our high performance manager then!

It’s not, I’m just being facetious.
 
Soooooooooo, what's the go hear? King heading in for his 3rd surgery this year. Phillipou out injured and Dave Misson gives an interview saying the Plantaris is not a serious injury, you don't even NEED that tendon and basically says it's no big deal. Now he's out again with more issues related to his Plantaris.






What the **** are we doing?


Our injury management isn’t great, but this article is steaming hot garbage.

“Scans on Sunday ruled out calf tendon damage or anything related to his Achilles…”

The Achilles is the distal “calf tendon”. I’m being nitpicky, but you will rarely see an injury to the proximal gastrocnemius tendon, and injuries to the soleus aponeurosis are not really swept up in the typical classification of a tendon injury. So, in reality, the low-tier journalist has effectively said that there’s no injury to the Achilles or the Achilles.


“Phillipou experienced issues with his plantaris tendon ahead of the trip to Alice Springs and then sustained a full rupture in the opening minutes of the win over Melbourne at TIO Traeger Park.”


Mattaes absolutely did not “rupture” his plantaris tendon against Melbourne. If he did, he wouldn’t be able to re-injure it as it wouldn’t be attached in any way such that it could be injured; a rupture means loss of continuity and therefore can’t be injured further. He either re-aggravated his plantaris in the Collingwood warm up, or he ruptured it against Melbourne; both are claimed in the article yet are mutually exclusive, unless the Saints have developed a way to magically heal significant soft tissue injuries in a fortnight.

I don’t expect them to write like they have a medical degree, but they’re not even doing the bare minimum. LLMs would write more accurate information, even with all of their hallucinations, so I fail to see how crap like this can be served up to justify their job.
 
So I gather given your well versed response you have first hand knowledge to the contrary? If so perhaps you would like to share the details with the forum rather than the tripe you rolled out.

Also have you ever taken the time to listen to Lyon's pressers?
I tell you what, I'll stack my evidence right beside your evidence that RTB is a dinosaur stuck in the eighties that is influencing our entire coaching and medical staff negatively.......is that a deal.......

And if you want evidence of RTB leaving the medical guys to do their job, I believe he's become well known for expressing a desire to "let the cobblers cobble".....as evidence goes it's pretty scant, but it certainly trumps your unfounded "feelz"......
 
Last edited:
Our injury management isn’t great, but this article is steaming hot garbage.

“Scans on Sunday ruled out calf tendon damage or anything related to his Achilles…”

The Achilles is the distal “calf tendon”. I’m being nitpicky, but you will rarely see an injury to the proximal gastrocnemius tendon, and injuries to the soleus aponeurosis are not really swept up in the typical classification of a tendon injury. So, in reality, the low-tier journalist has effectively said that there’s no injury to the Achilles or the Achilles.


“Phillipou experienced issues with his plantaris tendon ahead of the trip to Alice Springs and then sustained a full rupture in the opening minutes of the win over Melbourne at TIO Traeger Park.”


Mattaes absolutely did not “rupture” his plantaris tendon against Melbourne. If he did, he wouldn’t be able to re-injure it as it wouldn’t be attached in any way such that it could be injured; a rupture means loss of continuity and therefore can’t be injured further. He either re-aggravated his plantaris in the Collingwood warm up, or he ruptured it against Melbourne; both are claimed in the article yet are mutually exclusive, unless the Saints have developed a way to magically heal significant soft tissue injuries in a fortnight.

I don’t expect them to write like they have a medical degree, but they’re not even doing the bare minimum. LLMs would write more accurate information, even with all of their hallucinations, so I fail to see how crap like this can be served up to justify their job.
This is the kind of expert knowledge which, to be frank, this forum is sorely lacking. You should have your own Strahany Reacts thread for all our injury stuff! Please post more
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

“off legs for several months” wtf - did they just do a knee reconstruction on max ?
So if Max is “off his legs” because he hurt his knee, does that mean Hunter was “off his face” when he had his jaw smashed and Ben Paton “off his ****” when he tore his pecs? 🤔
 
I can’t stand David Misson… reminds me of another Richo and you just tune out. He’s constantly spruiking white noise… another hammy setback in rehab for Dougal.🙄 Fair dinkum, who was the ex-Essendon s&c/physio muppet Misson brought over to the Saints that bombers supporters flagged had a poor record

 

Remove this Banner Ad

So what do you guys think a club doctor does exactly?

I bet it doesnt have nearly as much to do with injury management as you think.

Dr Z has been at the Bulldogs since the days University played in the VFL. I doubt he is the main man for injury management at the Dogs over long term.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Can anyone explain the King injury/operation details? What exactly is wrong? What did they do in the three operations?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Injury Our Injury List

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top