Remove this Banner Ad

Port Bombers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dave_27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

dave_27

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
9,287
Reaction score
164
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Essendon
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Porthos

There's no doubt that Red Sash Specials are the biggest ripoff in the AFL, but other clubs keep on buying.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Ur mob cant seem to get enough of them.
Che
Cummings
Wanganeen
Kingsley
Hardwick
Mark Williams (coach)
Bailey (assistant coach)

R there anymore I have missed?

Shall I add Forster-Knight to that growing list of former Bombers at the Power.
 
Another one on a five-finger discount, I believe.
 
not a bad pickup, though surprised Port picked him up at 39. He's pretty calm and collective and doesnt panic under pressure. Has a hard work ethic but is not a tough physical player.

Tagged Kerr out of the game in the second half against West Coast after he was blitzing Essendon in the first which was a great effort by him considering he played reserves the day before.
 
I could see him ending up at another club because he works hard and gets a lot of the ball if let loose as a midfielder.

But #39 to Port? Never saw that coming. I was thinking pick #70 to Richmond/Carlton.

Almost as bad as Stanton at #13. :(
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Stanton at #13 isn't actually bad. He's just a smoky, not actually crap.

I'm astounded that we picked him at #39. I mean, did we think someone else would grab him before #46?
 
Originally posted by Porthos
Stanton at #13 isn't actually bad. He's just a smoky, not actually crap.

That's true, but there were more sensible selections. We've drafted Reynolds, Winderlich, Walsh in the past two years, and recruited Alvey this year. Not sure why we thought Stanton was a good pick.

Although, if I somehow convinced myself that we picked up Dyson at #13 and Stanton at #44, I'd be happy (although, I would have preferred Adam Bentick). :D
 
Originally posted by Porthos
Stanton at #13 isn't actually bad. He's just a smoky, not actually crap.

I'm astounded that we picked him at #39. I mean, did we think someone else would grab him before #46?

Possibly Kangaroos at #40 according to the Draft Show. Guy with a double-barrelled surname - we must be after the disenfranchised Norwood supporters ;) . And it's just like having an extra player in the side...
 
"Forster to Knight exploiting the overlap"
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom