Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Port Forum 'General AFL Talk' Thread Part 20

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is one eyed and there is bigfooty one eyed....

If any of our players did what Danger or Hawkins did you guys would have an absolute meltdown if they copped a suspension. And no Lycett is not even close to what Hawkins did...
Agree. Lycett’s was a sling tackle. Maybe as a port supporter I am biased, but seemingly less than the match review process. Geelong seems to get good outcomes on things which are a matter of opinion. You can not feel that if itvwas not Geelong, particularly a non Victorian based team, that Hawkins tackle would have likely been graded careless, high contact (head hit ground) and high impact (that is being kind as the player was concussed and could be severe). That is at least two games. That is how they have been grading. Hawkins did not need to bring the player to ground.
 
Shhesh the Crows show is still a thing?
I’ll bet there’s one topic they avoid.
I would literally watch I'm a Celebrity Get me out of Here, followed by Married at First Sight, followed by Farmer Wants a Wife, followed by The Bachelor, before I would even consider watching the Crows Show.
 
We could make something of Fogarty if he was with us.

There was a moment today where he presented nicely to the wing and took a mark in front of his defender by the boundary line, on about halfway.

But instead of looking to turn and go, or at least quickly assess options, he did a laconic slowing trot as if he’d taken the grab 35 metres out straight in front and was in the process of getting his breathing, heart rate and routine in order for the set shot. By the time he finally took his kick Melbourne had well and truly folded back.

I can’t tell whether it’s low footy IQ or sporadic workrate, but it really stood out in terms of the polar opposites that have typified his career to date.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad



Is it any different to this, 14 years ago? The afl supposedly trying to eliminate this kind of tackle..


I don't think that necessarily should have been a suspension either but there was more of a driving into the ground motion with Picketts than with Hawkin's tackle.

Chasedown tackles are a great part of the game. If they're one motion at high speed, and the tacklee has their arms down by their sides, it's difficult for the tackler to avoid pinning the arms and arguably unreasonable to expect tacklers to be able to avoid pinning the arms, so it becomes about the time of release I guess.

Basically I don't think there's a lot you can stamp out of the game by suspending these incidents. It's not like high bumps or sling tackles. Players are still going to complete chasedown tackles and occasionally a player will hit their head on the turf.
 
I would literally watch I'm a Celebrity Get me out of Here, followed by Married at First Sight, followed by Farmer Wants a Wife, followed by The Bachelor, before I would even consider watching the Crows Show.

 
Lycett four weeks for a similar action and the same outcome for the tackled player. Sounds about right. It really is time the MRO wasn't an AFL employee.
Yeah David King was spot on when he said they had to use the Lycett case to rid our game of such tackles. Unfortunately he forgot to add that if the offender plays for certain clubs, this penalty doesn't apply.
 
Tom Jonas must be wondering why he was fined for bringing down Naughton who wasn't injured and only received a free kick because he looked at the umpire with tears in his eyes.
 
Lycett four weeks for a similar action and the same outcome for the tackled player. Sounds about right. It really is time the MRO wasn't an AFL employee.


With Ned McHenry, you'd never know whether he missed the next week due to concussion, or for not being up to the standard.
 
Tom Jonas must be wondering why he was fined for bringing down Naughton who wasn't injured and only received a free kick because he looked at the umpire with tears in his eyes.
If he has any football smarts, he would have stopped wondering the second he remembered who Naughton plays for.

Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Butters on Saad was nothing and probably goes unseen if commentators with potato cam footage don't whinge about it for 5 minutes.
Butters needs to keep his hands to himself. No need for either action.

He is quite important for the team. Imagine getting suspended for that so preventing Boak or Gray winning a premiership.

Stupid.
 
Butters needs to keep his hands to himself. No need for either action.

He is quite important for the team. Imagine getting suspended for that so preventing Boak or Gray winning a premiership.

Stupid.

It was indeed quite silly.
 
Here's something interesting:

View attachment 1206917

Gawn, Petracca and Oliver spend most of their time on the ground for Melbourne. You've also got Brayshaw that is running at 81%+ game time. A typical Burgess lead fitness regime, I believe he's leaving Melbourne to come back to Adelaide because he knows that if they don't win it this year, he's going to have cooked their star players. Melbourne has used 28 players this year.

View attachment 1206920

Dogs spread the load across their midfield because they bat deep, but they are still making guys like Bontempelli, Hunter, Macrae and Smith do a mountain of work on the field. This for mine is the reason why they are sputtering at exactly the wrong time of the year, and why I desperately want to play them in the first week of finals. Notably absent from this list are Liberatore and Treloar - but note that English is up there as a resting ruck whereas Jackson from Melbourne is nowhere to be seen. The Bulldogs have used 34 players this year.

View attachment 1206922

Geelong plays more of their first choice medium defenders and half backs on the field - Kolodjashnij, Tuohy, Atkins, Bews - along with medium forwards and wingers like Rohan, Close and Smith. Shows you where they generate a lot of their drive from and how big a loss Stewart is going to be for them come finals. Again, you have Blicavs as resting ruck - three of the top four teams all play a resting ruck for 80+% game time, and all four play a two ruck system. Note too that none of Dangerfield, Selwood, Duncan or Guthrie have more than 80% game time, compared to the likes of Petracca, Oliver, Botempelli, Hunter, Macrae or Smith. Part of this would be age...but part of it would also involve keeping their powder dry for September. Geelong has used 29 players this year.

View attachment 1206925

Port is like a hybrid of Geelong and the Dogs - a focus on drive out of defence and up through the wing to half forward. You've got your wingers in Amon, Duursma and Motlop, your medium forwards in Gray, Rozee and Fantasia, and one half back in Byrne-Jones. What's important to note here is who is missing from this list i.e. who is fresh for finals compared to other teams - Wines, Burton, Houston, Butters, Bergman, Bonner, Drew, Marshall, Georgiades, Powell-Pepper. Port Adelaide has used 32 players this year.


Interesting.

Is there a table with total ToG for the season?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Made the mistake of venturing over yonder yesterday. Apparently, despite the team's incredible luck with injuries, Port will get smashed by the Dogs this week, then lose to Melbourne, and finally exit the finals in straight sets with a loss to Brisbane.
 
Made the mistake of venturing over yonder yesterday. Apparently, despite the team's incredible luck with injuries, Port will get smashed by the Dogs this week, then lose to Melbourne, and finally exit the finals in straight sets with a loss to Brisbane.
It's all possible.
 
Made the mistake of venturing over yonder yesterday.
Well that's your decision, but don't double down on your mistake by inflicting it on us as well by reporting back here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top