Mega Thread Port Forum 'General AFL Talk' Thread Part 9

[TeeKray]

Richmond are scary good at the ‘G.

That said, bring them on there in finals!

Yeah they are absolute monsters at the 'G but I'd rather watch us have a crack at the impossible than some other team.

 

[Del165198]

Danger just doesn't give a **** defensively

Same with ablett

 

[edgie]

Our system could beat Richmond at the G if we nullify their big 4.

They could also do us by twelve goals.

Sent from mTalk

 

[ozph1870]

67 kicks 79 handballs... yeah thats why youre getting pumped...

 

[spookism]

They basically acquired Nank for a Schnitzel pack n'onion rings

I would kill for one of them right now, so that's actually got good trade value.

 

[Del165198]

Wouldnt surprise me if it turns out Richmond are on some endurance juice

Their players just get to contest after contest, so many repeat sprint efforts

As individuals they arent super talented other than a few

 

[Scholz Supremacy]

Yeah they are absolute monsters at the 'G but I'd rather watch us have a crack at the impossible than some other team.

Fact: Richmond have not beaten Port Adelaide at the MCG since 1998

 

[Magus]

I'd back us against Richmond any time. They just wanna attack all day. Defensively we have their measure.

 

[PowerBaz]

I'd back us against Richmond any time. They just wanna attack all day. Defensively we have their measure.

They have the ‘I’m taking my bat home attitude’ about them.

 

[edgie]

I'd back us against Richmond any time. They just wanna attack all day. Defensively we have their measure.

Attack always beats defence in this league

Sent from mTalk

 

[PowerBaz]

Let’s face it though, compared to a Shiwdown this is 2/10

 

[jdeezy]

I naively think we could beat Richmond at the G if we meet them during the finals.

Which of course means they'd win by 10 goals

 

[Byrons Firen]

Danger just doesn't give a **** defensively

Same with ablett

Beneath them?

 

[Greasyrhys]

Tigers should be up by a lot more

 

[Magus]

Attack always beats defence in this league

Sent from mTalk

You need both. Two teams attacking will result in a shootout and then anyone's game.

 

[chachi11]

Good game this

 

[JimmyBeerCans]

Umpire helmet cam lol like they need more ego boosting avenues

 

[spookism]

Well, I didn't expect Geelong to be that close.
Richmond had a fair old snooze then.

 

[LFC2010]

Different rule book tonight?

the most obvious infringement of the 10m protected zone rule of the season completely ignored by the umps.

 

[TeeKray]

Geelong are so arsey.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

So now Gillon McLachlan has overseen some stupid scheduling decision with the AFLW and defended it by comparing the comp to the World Cup. I guess the relentless idiocy of his decisions can't be called sexist.

 

[edgie]

You need both. Two teams attacking will result in a shootout and then anyone's game.

You don't think Richmond have both?

Sent from mTalk

 

[Ford Fairlane]

the most obvious infringement of the 10m protected zone rule of the season completely ignored by the umps.

Imagine how many 50s would be given against us if we took those liberties.

And Geelong being carried in the sedan chair by the umps tonight.

 

[mic59]

the most obvious infringement of the 10m protected zone rule of the season completely ignored by the umps.

There is a definite negative correlation between applying rules that the public hates and Vic blockbuster games.

 

[The Rubber Man]

Just saw kennedy should miss next week against us. Very handy out

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app