Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Possible trades in 2015 for the Crows

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattrox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
How does Menzel rate compared to Bernie Vince? Vince got us pick 23 and I reckon he goes alright. A suitable benchmark?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

No way I'd give our first pick for Menzel. He's a good player but his output isn't worthy of a first round pick
If Dangerfield goes which is highly likely IMO that will give us our 1st rounder and the compo pick, I'd do it, but really I think we should be trying to match Geelong's offer to Dangerfield and going for Geelong's 1st pick and a player [Gregson or Murdoch] at the very least, then use our own 1st round pick on Menzel??
 
If Dangerfield goes which is highly likely IMO that will give us our 1st rounder and the compo pick, I'd do it, but really I think we should be trying to match Geelong's 0offer to Dangerfield and going for Geelong's 1st pick and a player [Gregson or Murdoch] then use our own 1st round pick on Menzel??

If we could use the 1st rounder on Menzel or Scharenberg I'd go the latter every day of the week
 
He is impatient and frustrated with Menzel's performances

You have stated this as fact, how do you actually know this?

However I do agree that any decision to trade Menzel.will be on the basis to secure another first round pick

Also our interest in Menzel has been reported well before Redhorse's post

No worries mate. Posts like this are one of the worst things about this board. Happens to nearly anyone who reveals anything.

I spill what I can without doing enough to jeopardise receiving future information. I assume like others, what I post upfront is all I can reveal at the time.

Our interest in Menzel has been reported? I hadn't read it until today, maybe I'm just out of the loop. Plenty of rumours go around; I sought confirmation. Which is why I chased it up today - once I heard about it.

What I stated about Silvagni is what I was told today (albeit not by the person who confirmed this from our end). I posted what I was told and what I'm able to divulge. If you'd prefer me to give less information and only run with what I've got 100% direct first hand primary confirmation with, I will. But I thought it was relevant.

People consistently request people to out information and then wonder why they don't when they obtain it. Happens on nearly every board here - those who post what they here are attacked unless they can provide direct evidence, the exact evidence that would likely see them lose a source. Am I happy to share what I can? Yeah. Am I happy to ensure I never get fed information again to appease the attack dogs? Nope.
 
No worries mate. Posts like this are one of the worst things about this board. Happens to nearly anyone who reveals anything.

I spill what I can without doing enough to jeopardise receiving future information. I assume like others, what I post upfront is all I can reveal at the time.

Our interest in Menzel has been reported? I hadn't read it until today, maybe I'm just out of the loop. Plenty of rumours go around; I sought confirmation. Which is why I chased it up today - once I heard about it.

What I stated about Silvagni is what I was told today (albeit not by the person who confirmed this from our end). I posted what I was told and what I'm able to divulge. If you'd prefer me to give less information and only run with what I've got 100% direct first hand primary confirmation with, I will. But I thought it was relevant.

People consistently request people to out information and then wonder why they don't when they obtain it. Happens on nearly every board here - those who post what they here are attacked unless they can provide direct evidence, the exact evidence that would likely see them lose a source. Am I happy to share what I can? Yeah. Am I happy to ensure I never get fed information again to appease the attack dogs? Nope.

Appreciate your work Skippos, and the tidbits you and others share. Cheers!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Don't want to be greedy, but how about a triple this year. Something like:

Menzel Scharenberg Aish

Id rather it be yarran, scharenberg, bennell.

I'll be slightly more realistic and go:

Menzel, Scharenberg, R.Thompson (you can never have too many Rorys)

oh, and Nathan Wilson :)
 
Firstly, I don't believe this is allowed under the future pick trading rules.

Secondly, that would make it 4 years without taking a first round pick to the draft for Port. Kenny doing a Ross Lyon number on their list?

Nothing stopping a club from trading away their current and future first rounders. The only rule is you have to use 2 first rounders every 4 years. Not sure when this kicks in though.

If it's for 2012-15, we must use a first round pick this year. As must Port. And Hawthorn would have to use 2...
 
It kicks in this year. Doesn't matter what people have done in the past.
 
My info was correct though. We were very close.

I think his managed used the Adelaide offer to get as much as possible out of GWS

Cameron signed for 5 years which indicated to me that he was always going to stay at GWS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom