Opinion Posts That Don't Deserve a Thread (Random Opinion or Questions)

[brad cooper]

The kid wce reserves Tom Barass looks a really good player at chb. Not getting a game behind McGovern Mckenzie Schofield. Would be worth an enquiry especially if out of contract.

Also really like the thought of Stephen Hill if freo are going to do a major rebuild, not sure if we could fit him in cap.

 

[bedford]

No !

 

[GotTheGoodes]

No !

Succinct & to the point.

Why?


EDIT: Just realised you probably mean Hill not Barass?? If so, completely with you on that. Downhill skier that bloke. Do not want.

 

[Tedeski]

Downhill skier!

 

[bedford]

Downhill skier!

If Hill was with us you'd defend him no matter what, even if he was on the same shit as his bro

 

[Tedeski]

These guys look wonderful when the team is flying but leave you one player short in the game when digging in is required.

 

[CD__]

Gaff is a poor man's Hannebery...massively overrated.

 

[Tedeski]

If Hill was with us you'd defend him no matter what, even if he was on the same shit as his bro

I would defend you mate because you are with us.
I felt the same about Jetta.
I'll stick up for players that are trying to make their mark in the game on basic salary, even if they will inevitably fail but I am pretty hard on seasoned players on good contracts who are continuously way down on their output when at their best.

 

[miggs]

Gaff is a poor man's Hannebery...massively overrated.

Id say more of a rich mans jetta.. Have yet to see Gaff win a contested possesion ever. If we can cover for him defensively id love him at the swans. But he only chops up at subiaco because of how much space he gets on the wings over here. SCG might not suit him.

 

[garyrohan8]

Gaff is a poor man's Hannebery...massively overrated.

there is only one hannebery. gut runs, tackles and wins the contested stuff. if gaff improves the latter two he will be a very good player. i'd say his disposal is better than dan's also. neither of the are super fast.

 

[CD__]

there is only one hannebery. gut runs, tackles and wins the contested stuff. if gaff improves the latter two he will be a very good player. i'd say his disposal is better than dan's also. neither of the are super fast.

I think if Hanners kicked under as little pressure as Gaff does then his skills would look equal if not better.

 

[garyrohan8]

thats fair enough, he does tend to get out into more space as a result of shying away from the contested stuff.

 

[miggs]

I really hate Dermie

 

[The King!]

Cheers. Yeah I got row a on the wing so hopefully won't be too bad

If your row b c d or 2 3 4 whatever they use then hope you are tall

 

[MF]

If your row b c d or 2 3 4 whatever they use then hope you are tall

Row A so hopefully will get a nice view

 

[The King!]

Row A so hopefully will get a nice view

Thats good seats !!

Just push through all the north flogs

 

[Daroxic]

 

[Punts]

McDonald would be awesome

 

[Cadsky]

This i am very ok with!

 

[miggs]

get it done aslong as it doesnt mean mitchell to re join roosy

 

[Punts]

Tommy gun McDonald

 

[The King!]

Over media and fans blaming scg size as an excuse

 

[Cadsky]

From memory its not that much shorter than the mcg now?

 

[The King!]

Who cares anyway, surely makes it easier? If you play on bigger grounds then you should be longer kicks or able to run further

 

[Tuco]

Over media and fans blaming scg size as an excuse

Are the people blaming the ground size asking why it is the Swans can win away from the scg?

Gabba, Etihad, MCG all been fine for us and we kicked 100pts in our loss at Adelaide.

Whingeing about the scg is hands down the weakest excuse in football.