Remove this Banner Ad

Priority draft pick rules tightened

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Posts
62,675
Reaction score
62,196
Location
Las Vegas
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Norwood
Priority draft pick rules tightened
By Sam Lienert
November 17, 2005

AFL teams will be given less reward for underperforming, under a change to the priority draft pick system announced today.

Under the current system, any club that finishes a season with 20 premiership points (five wins) or less is awarded a priority selection before the opening round of the national draft.
The new policy, to come into place from next season, reduces the threshold to 16 premiership points, and the priority pick will be delayed until after each club has had a first-round selection.
Only if a club has two consecutive seasons in which it finishes with 16 points or less will it be granted a priority pick before the first round.
If the proposed system had been in place this year, no club would have received a priority pick in the national draft.
As it is, Collingwood, Hawthorn and Carlton will have an extra pick in the draft later this month.
The three clubs will be able to draft the six best youngsters in the country between them, with each to have a priority pick and a first-round pick before Essendon, which finished fourth-last, gets its first selection.
AFL chief executive Andrew Demetriou said the change marked a step towards an "uncompromised" draft, adding that it would also scotch speculation that clubs out of finals calculations were happy to lose games late in the season.
"The AFL has never found any evidence of clubs deliberately losing games in order to secure priority picks," Demetriou said.
"However, I think you would all know there's been immense speculation over the past few years that this has or may have occurred.
"While there are reports of supporters wanting their teams to lose in order to secure priority picks, it seems appropriate to tighten the qualification criteria to reduce the incidence of this speculation."
The change would also decrease the problem of teams that consistently finished on the middle rungs of the ladder being significantly disadvantaged, compared with those that finished at the bottom, Demetriou said.
The AFL meanwhile released its financial results for the 2005 season, reporting record revenue of more than $201 million.
The league made a net surplus of $6.513 million, after $94 million was distributed to the 16 AFL clubs and $3.6 million was set aside for legal fees related to the case involving pay-TV company C7.
AFL chairman Ron Evans said the league had reduced its debt to less than $30 million, and it expected to be debt free by the end of 2006.
Thirteen of the 16 AFL clubs recorded a profit for 2005, with the clubs' aggregate profit $11 million, up from $10.1 million last year, Evans said.

AAP

so what we have got instead of fergus ? :mad: pick bloody 4 ?
 
Capitalist said:
so what we have got instead of fergus ? :mad: pick bloody 4 ?

I don't think we've been hosed that badly the last few years.

Under the revised pick structure:

2001 (Pick 12 - Reilly) would have had pick 10 (Sam Power). Pick 11 was Richard Cole.
2002 (traded away our pick) would have moved up 1 slot from 14 to 13.
2003 (Pick 14 - Watts) would have had pick 12 (Ryan Murphy). Pick 13 was Brett Stanton.
2004 (Pick 8 - Meesen) would have had pick 6 (Tom Williams). Pick 7 was Jordan Lewis.

Given that we were always going for a ruckman last year, and always going for a KPP in 2003, I don't see that we would have drafted any differently even if the priority pick set up was different.
 
About bloody time too. Now are they going to also endevour to give us an "uncompromised draw" and an "uncompromised" competition. It's a disgrace the way this competion is run. Strong, well run clubs have to si6t back and watch as weak, poorly run clubs continue to operate in the red and seek hand outs from the AFL. As an example, it's a disgrace that a middle of the road club like Port can receive a $200,000 hand out from the AFL 12 months after winning a premiership. What does that say about the clubs at the lower end of town.
 
SpringChoke said:
As an example, it's a disgrace that a middle of the road club like Port can receive a $200,000 hand out from the AFL 12 months after winning a premiership. What does that say about the clubs at the lower end of town.

It gives a whole new meaning to the song...
Theres a dead skunk in the middle of the road....dead ska :D nk in the middle etc

heh heh
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

About freaking time I say.

Its a better system than the one we had up to this point. I still think there is incentive there to tank for teams like Carlton. They might win 4 games this year and they might cheat their way to winning 4 the following year.

I am not a big fan of the priority picks but since the AFL wants to keep them, this system is probably as good as it gets.
 
Its better than it is now. It stops a Brisbane/West Coast one off crap season from reaping the rewards and if you lose under 4 games for two years running then you probably deserve a bit of help.

If clubs want to tank for two years then thats up to them...I hope my club never resorts to that.
 
Macca19 said:
Its better than it is now. It stops a Brisbane/West Coast one off crap season from reaping the rewards and if you lose under 4 games for two years running then you probably deserve a bit of help.

If clubs want to tank for two years then thats up to them...I hope my club never resorts to that.[/
QUOTE]

What he said.
 
Macca19 said:
Its better than it is now. It stops a Brisbane/West Coast one off crap season from reaping the rewards and if you lose under 4 games for two years running then you probably deserve a bit of help.

If clubs want to tank for two years then thats up to them...I hope my club never resorts to that.

Agree with that as well


If we cannot win 8 home games out of 26 (plus 4 showdowns) over 2 years then I guess we will be looking for a new coach as well.
 
This is a much fairer system. Rather can getting rewarded with a gun player early in the draft (& to much of an incentive to tank), the poorer performing clubs will still get a decent player with effectively a 2nd early 2nd round pick.
 
Kane McGoodwin said:
This is a much fairer system.

Tax reform - GST
Team reform - AFC
IR reform - ACTU
Draft reform - AFL

Now if only there was brain reform...

fergus_watts.jpg


^FHC
 
About time.

This is a good move as teams benefit way too much from the present priority pick concessions.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom