Conspiracy Theory Proof 9/11 was an Inside Job?

[SaintsSeptember]

And we'll be vindicated in time. Matter of time. One day you'll PM me and all the others you condescended in this thread and humbly apologize.

GG Please trust me you are on the correct track , I am actually an alien intelligence, and have manipulated the internet. You are the only one who can read this message, to all others it is simply another condescending piece of puff.
Dont trust anyone, even those closest to you are agents.

 

[exe ex machina]

I'll give you points at least for an imaginative put-down. The Emu's raptor image was weird enough to be cool.

But, I will get my apology in time. So many of you pro-O/S just don't realize you're barking up the incorrect tree in terms of the truths behind 9/11. Every year that goes by it's being pried open bit by bit.

 

[CLUBMEDhurst]

Quick question for those who buy the official story.

Have you ever been willing to question the the veracity of the incompetence theory as opposed to the they let it happen theory?

 

[Helicopter Punt]

No need to speculate as it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt (unless your a conspiracy nut with a confirmation bias) that a plane did hit the Pentagon. I posted proof a few posts back

Proven you say? I wasn't aware any incontrovertible evidence publicly existed proving any such thing.

keeping in mind:

However that does not mean you start ... simply making claims without valid scientific method.

What proof were you referring to?


BTW what is your explanation - 'valid scientific method' is optional - for an open un-singed book next to an inferno which is claimed to have burnt almost an entire commercial aircraft, its passengers and cargo out of existence?

Quick question for those who buy the official story.

Have you ever been willing to question the the veracity of the incompetence theory as opposed to the they let it happen theory?

Ah, the sound of crickets as the tumbleweed blows past.

You didn't really expect a substantive answer did you CM? If you played the man every time someone else offered an original thought would you then offer yours?

 

[Stocks_go_Up]

keeping in mind:
What proof were you referring to?
BTW what is your explanation - 'valid scientific method' is optional - for an open un-singed book next to an inferno which is claimed to have burnt almost an entire commercial aircraft, its passengers and cargo out of existence?

What are you trying to say? You do realise when the plane crashed that parts still got scattered over the crash site right? That is your scientific idea for why it was a missile? A book? Are you being serious?

Second. The burden is on YOU to prove it didn't happen the way they say, not me - you are the one saying the official version is not correct. Show me proof a missile hit the Pentagon, where are the 100's of witnesses, where are the photos showing it, why are there pieces on an AA jet and human remains scattered in the crash site at the Pentagon? What happened to all the people who were supposed to be on the plane? Show me proof, not opinion PROOF. How can a missile knock over 4 light towers?

Fact: AA jet hit the Pentagon
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...cy/q0265.shtml
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0290.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

Still waiting for evidence of a missile hitting the Pentagon.

 

[exe ex machina]

A SkyWarrior drone decked out in AA colors knocked over light towers, fired a missile and was crashed into the pentagon.

There's already proof that a piece of the engine found belongs to the SkyWarrior model, not a Boeing.

 

[Stocks_go_Up]

A SkyWarrior drone decked out in AA colors knocked over light towers, fired a missile and was crashed into the pentagon.

There's already proof that a piece of the engine found belongs to the SkyWarrior model, not a Boeing.

Did you even read the website I posted? It clearly explains why it was NOT an A3 Skywarrior..... Not only that you have 100+ witnesses saying they saw an AA Jet, with most even being able to say it was a 757.. It looks nothing like a Skywarrior, how can you explain 100+ witnesses saying they saw a 757? What happened to the people who were on the plane? Is the coroner lying who had to try ID the remains from the crash site - if so prove it.

 

[CamTinley]

You are severely disconnected from reality, I actually feel sorry for you.. Some time during your life you were searching for answers to fill a void you felt inside, you developed a mistrust for authority for some reason and have decided to dedicate your energy to conspiracy theories - no matter how stupid and ridiculous they are.

You are completely disconnected from reality, you have lost the ability to think rationally and see both sides of an argument - this is not good. One day when you grow up and learn to think critically and objectively you will look back and see how brainwashed and ignorant you were. You won't grow as a person until you learn to accept that not everyone is out to get you, you are not being followed by the CIA, the US Government did not plan 9/11 - they just reacted to it very badly. A big difference.

Do you think it is strange that there is no photographic/video evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon ?

If a plane had flown into a Wal-mart store I reckon you would have a half dozen cameras capturing it.

 

[exe ex machina]

That site is incorrect, The Emu.
That is not a Boeing part.

 

[Helicopter Punt]

What are you trying to say? You do realise when the plane crashed that parts still got scattered over the crash site right? That is your scientific idea for why it was a missile? A book? Are you being serious?

Considering there is no mention of missile in my post, perhaps you should ask yourself the same.
I'm not trying to say anything. I asked a couple of questions.

Second. The burden is on YOU to prove it didn't happen the way they say, not me - you are the one saying the official version is not correct. Show me proof a missile hit the Pentagon, where are the 100's of witnesses, where are the photos showing it, why are there pieces on an AA jet and human remains scattered in the crash site at the Pentagon? What happened to all the people who were supposed to be on the plane? Show me proof, not opinion PROOF. How can a missile knock over 4 light towers?

Fact: AA jet hit the Pentagon
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...cy/q0265.shtml
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0290.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

Still waiting for evidence of a missile hitting the Pentagon.

Not at all. I simply don't believe their version of events. End of story. No burden whatsoever.
I would submit if there is any burden of proof it rests with those telling the story.

 

[exe ex machina]

The Emu...

It's exactly like the roadblock we get when you post the word of a site/org that tells you, that WTC7 legitimately collapsed from fire in its own footprint perfectly and at free fall speed, that WTC12 collapsed legitimately from a plane collision and warping of steel from combustion from jet fuel and office debris at free fall speed.

You just parrot disinformation thinking it "debunks" valid science and known engine parts of a known military model drone.

 

[exe ex machina]

If there is any burden of proof it rests with those telling the story.

This is exactly right 100%. They're the ones who came up with some story about how everything happened, and conducted bogus commission into it, forced it down everyone's throats. The burden of proof is completely and utterly on the govt.

See, the govt is like the prosecutor claiming that so and so party are responsible for a crime, and it's innocent until proven guilty, with the burden of proof on the prosecuting team to convince the judge/jury that the party is guilty.

 

[bomberclifford]

You just parrot disinformation thinking it "debunks" valid science

 

[rayven]

And we'll be vindicated in time. Matter of time. One day you'll PM me and all the others you condescended in this thread and humbly apologize.

If you want to go down the false flag attack scenario, you will eventualy look at the two other attacks against the 3 protaginists quite diffently.

In your own time investigate the london bombings of 7/7 and those caught, what they have been involved in and look what it meant politicly for the (at the time)struggling Blair goverment. Take note of the ordanance instructor for those british guys and his previous dealings with tim osmans mates..He's actualy a free man now after serving an undisclosed sentance in an undisclosed location, apparantly.

Then go look at Bali and what that achieved for Howard......

He was up against a wall concerning the war on terror, next day the political landscape completly changed.

These are ideas /scenarios put up or debate by some people. but i havnt heard anyone link any of those responible for the Bali job with our or anyones secret service, unlike the 7/7 nd 9/11 events.

 

[Stocks_go_Up]

That site is incorrect, The Emu.
That is not a Boeing part.

Prove it.

 

[Stocks_go_Up]

I feel bad for laughing at that

 

[Dean3]

The Emu...

It's exactly like the roadblock we get when you post the word of a site/org that tells you, that WTC7 legitimately collapsed from fire in its own footprint perfectly and at free fall speed, that WTC12 collapsed legitimately from a plane collision and warping of steel from combustion from jet fuel and office debris at free fall speed.

You just parrot disinformation thinking it "debunks" valid science and known engine parts of a known military model drone.

GG, your ability to peddle total crap, parrot disinformation like this, and then accuse someone else of just that, is...breathtakingly sad.

Not even the other CTs in this thread support you. Most of them now prefer to peddle the "they let it happen" nonsense. But not you, you just keep going with your silly delusional rubbish. Gotta admire your ability to ignore inconvenient facts and forge ahead I suppose.

 

[exe ex machina]

The Emu...

Prove it?

I just showed you a picture of the actual part from the actual plane. Simple and clean. No pages long BS and penciled illustrations and a lot of mumbo jumbo that makes someone (you) with no mechanical/aeronautical experience gullibly say, "oh it sounds and looks so technical, it must be true".

It's like you believing the world is flat and me telling you that it is proven scientifically by showing you this...

and you still retorting, "prove it."

.

 

[Stocks_go_Up]

The Emu...

Prove it?

I just showed you a picture of the actual part from the actual plane. Simple and clean. No pages long BS and penciled illustrations and a lot of mumbo jumbo that makes someone (you) with no mechanical/aeronautical experience gullibly say, "oh it sounds and looks so technical, it must be true".

It's like you believing the world is flat and me telling you that it is proven scientifically by showing you this...

and you still retorting, "prove it."

.

You are extremely simple minded, did you graduate high school? Serious question.

 

[exe ex machina]

You are clearly not a professional in any technical or scientific vocation. Plus, incredulously gullible (if you even get that).

 

[Daytripper]

You are clearly not a professional in any technical or scientific vocation. Plus, incredulously gullible (if you even get that).

LOL - and you are what exactly?

Please don't embarrass yourself and claim to be an engineer like your mate vealsey.

The facts are that yourself, rayven, vealsey etc are just simplistic anti Americans with pot-addled brains.

Honestly only a complete moron would believe that a missile hit the Pentagon. All it takes is one simple question to confirm it which is -
Where the hell did the plane go then?

Provide a legitimate answer to that question and then you can explore the missile theory - but of course none of you can and most of you don't even want to contemplate the question as it makes you look stupid.

 

[vealesy]

Dude get over it.

I can, still smoke pot and be an engineer.

Ill tell you what happened to those planes if you tell me where the black boxes are.

 

[Dean3]

Ill tell you what happened to those planes if you tell me where the black boxes are.

Found in the Pentagon along with all the other bits of plane.

 

[Daytripper]

Dude get over it.

I can, still smoke pot and be an engineer.

I don't doubt that its possible to still smoke pot and be an engineer but when you combine the stupidity factor as well, it then becomes improbable.

You have as much chance of being an engineer as me banging Scarlett Johanssen.

Ill tell you what happened to those planes if you tell me where the black boxes are.

Sure - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77

Various pieces of aircraft debris were found within the wreckage at the Pentagon. While on fire himself, and escaping from the Navy Command Center, Lt. Kevin Shaeffer observed a chunk of the aircraft's nose cone and the nose landing gear in the service road between rings B and C.[67] Early in the morning on Friday, September 14, Fairfax County Urban Search and Rescue Team members Carlton Burkhammer and Brian Moravitz came across an "intact seat from the plane's cockpit",[68] while paramedics and firefighters located the two black boxes near the punch out hole in the A-E drive,[69] nearly 300 feet (91 m) into the building.[38] The cockpit voice recorder was too badly damaged and charred to retrieve any information,[70] though the flight data recorder yielded useful information.[36] Investigators also found a part of Nawaf al-Hazmi's driver's license in the North Parking Lot rubble pile.[71] Personal effects belonging to victims were also found, and taken to Fort Myer.[72]

But of course you won't answer the question about where the missing plane is, will you?

 

[SaintsSeptember]

I seem to recall something about smoking dope and paranoia. Its all starting to make sense.