purringgirl
Senior List
Sorry, I don't know eitherHopefully someone will happen along soon who can tell you or you could try contacting the paper and asking them.
Thanks Bumpswithagrin
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Sorry, I don't know eitherHopefully someone will happen along soon who can tell you or you could try contacting the paper and asking them.
With the retirement of Max Bailey, what will be the strategy for player substitution, when there is no game-ending injury.
1) Do we continue with resting a ruck for a small, pacey player?
2) Do we bring in a fresh player to rest a lower-performing player and reshuffle the players out on the field to suit?
I think the fact that the players are more versatile now and can play more than one position, I would lean towards strategy #2. What do others think?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He was in the box on Thursday nite and can also be seen marshalling the troups at training. He may even be coaching tonight???Is Ratten still around? Don't think I have seen him or heard him mentioned all pre-season?
Haha ok.. Clearly not observing closely enough!He was in the box on Thursday nite and can also be seen marshalling the troups at training. He may even be coaching tonight???
He was in the box on Thursday nite and can also be seen marshalling the troups at training. He may even be coaching tonight???
I think the most likely case is that we sub out the player with the worst injury by the third quarter (unless a more serious injury happens earlier). If there are no injuries or niggles then we sub out the worst performing player to that point and shuffle the team as required.With the retirement of Max Bailey, what will be the strategy for player substitution, when there is no game-ending injury.
1) Do we continue with resting a ruck for a small, pacey player?
2) Do we bring in a fresh player to rest a lower-performing player and reshuffle the players out on the field to suit?
I think the fact that the players are more versatile now and can play more than one position, I would lean towards strategy #2. What do others think?
With the retirement of Max Bailey, what will be the strategy for player substitution, when there is no game-ending injury.
1) Do we continue with resting a ruck for a small, pacey player?
2) Do we bring in a fresh player to rest a lower-performing player and reshuffle the players out on the field to suit?
I think the fact that the players are more versatile now and can play more than one position, I would lean towards strategy #2. What do others think?
There has been a lot of hoo ha recently about other teams leadership groups but I have heard nothing about Hawthorn's. I don't even know who was in our leadership group last year. Have we announced ours? Do we announce it? (personally think leadership groups are a bit overrated but am still interested to know who is in ours).
Is Ratten still around? Don't think I have seen him or heard him mentioned all pre-season?
All I know about ours is Hodge is Captain and Rough and Lewis are Vice Captains. Not sure if there are any others or who they would be.
The new book, Playing to Win, says that the leadership group comprised six players last year. I haven't read who they were.Thanks, that's all I know too. Interesting that Hawthorn don't seem to be shouting it from the rooftops like all the other clubs. Maybe we don't have one per se (not a big fan of them myself but they seem to be mandatory for clubs these days).
The new book, Playing to Win, says that the leadership group comprised six players last year. I haven't read who they were.
Interestingly, Mitchell declined to be part of the leadership group when he left the captaincy to Hodge. Said he didn't want to get in the way, and wanted to give Hodge someone outside the group to talk to if things got tough. Not sure if he is part of the leadership now or not.I reckon Mitchell would be one of them then.
Interestingly, Mitchell declined to be part of the leadership group when he left the captaincy to Hodge. Said he didn't want to get in the way, and wanted to give Hodge someone outside the group to talk to if things got tough. Not sure if he is part of the leadership now or not.
If it's in the book I haven't got to it yet!When you say you haven't read who is in the leadership group do you mean it's not it the book or you're not up to that bit yet?
Guys like Mitchell and Burgoyne are leaders regardless of titles (Burgoyne may or may not have been in the group, I'm unsure). They're the kind of guys who everyone in the team would listen to regardless. They're experienced, wise and always lead via example on the field.That's interesting. Not a bad strategy though, giving the new leader a clear run at it. I only thought he would be in because he is a smart and articulate bloke and a former captain.
When you say you haven't read who is in the leadership group do you mean it's not it the book or you're not up to that bit yet?
The new book, Playing to Win, says that the leadership group comprised six players last year. I haven't read who they were.
Slight change of tack, but is there any Dream Team comps for this board like last year?