sante
Emu
you dont need to pay more than 105k when looking for solid bench options
In 2010 it looks like a good option. Maybe in the midfield, but elsewhere, its very hard to find one, let alone two players below 105k worth picking.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

AFLW Logo
The livestream will be available on womens.afl & the AFLW app. Join our live chat!
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
you dont need to pay more than 105k when looking for solid bench options
no its not in the foward line and even to a lesser extent the backline my most expensive bench player is 101k. I can think of 4 viable fowards under 101k and in the backline there are proberly another 4 although some of them are not as certain as in the fowerdlineIn 2010 it looks like a good option. Maybe in the midfield, but elsewhere, its very hard to find one, let alone two players below 105k worth picking.
you dont need to pay more than 105k when looking for solid bench options there a enough options below that to have a decent bench which will increase in price, the only exeception i would make though is for the backline where rookie options are scarce.
i disagree on waters hunt is a better option but like you say that is just an opinion
I am a collingwood supporter and Beams is not entrenhed in the pies best 22 he will be like last year compeating with several players for the same spot and with the indroduction of ball who is a certin starter and buckley who will add more competion he is far from certin, at the moment sidebottom is proberly ahead of him anyway, but the reality is beams will play reguarly only if someone gets injured, he will most likely drift in and out of the side depending on the oppositiona and his form.
Macevoy and white are both better options than natanui (I predict that both will be simialr to tippet last year and score incosistant but be good enough to be an upgrade) and while they are not the best replacements for him they along with ledenburger the best options without upgrading him.
TBH, I'm not really following your opinions Spoony. Some of them are just not true.
Beams will play 22 games if he is injury free and he stays in form. He is ahead of Steele by quite a margin and is so far ahead of Buckley it isn't funny (Buckley is a running half back flanker, not a tough midfielder). I'm not sure that Beam's average will rise that much to pick him but he is definitely in our best 22.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
no its not in the foward line and even to a lesser extent the backline my most expensive bench player is 101k. I can think of 4 viable fowards under 101k and in the backline there are proberly another 4 although some of them are not as certain as in the fowerdline
proberly but there is enough flexibility to changeOkay, but will they be named Round 1 and can they hold their spot in the team to make cash? Even if they do, they probably won't average enough to make any decent cash.
proberly but there is enough flexibility to change
yes and i only need them to play 3 games
and yes they will average enough you need to look more closely at the rookie options if you dont think they will average enough, even if they only average say 55 which they should do better than they will still earn me over 100k which wiht my current structure will proberly be all i need to upgrade to premium.
proberly but there is enough flexibility to change
yes and i only need them to play 3 games
and yes they will average enough you need to look more closely at the rookie options if you dont think they will average enough, even if they only average say 55 which they should do better than they will still earn me over 100k which wiht my current structure will proberly be all i need to upgrade to premium.
Goddard, Enright, Hodge, Birchall, malcheski, kennelly, Hunt (waters, Davis)
Bartel, Selwood, Cooney, Mastern, Martin, Banner (Shuey, Bastinac)
Sandilands, Kruezer (Warnock, Lobbe)
Riewoldt, Goodes, Pavlich, Franklin, Medhurst, Dangerfield, Rockliff (TDL, Podsiadly)
Thoughts?
CuriousObsession has pointed it out, but if you plan on keeping your bench players for 3 weeks, you won't be making a lot of money out of them unless they average around 100, which I think everyone knows, is a less than 5% chance of happening.
Goddard, Enright, Hodge, Birchall, malcheski, kennelly, Hunt (waters, Davis)
Bartel, Selwood, Cooney, Mastern, Martin, Banner (Shuey, Bastinac)
Sandilands, Kruezer (Warnock, Lobbe)
Riewoldt, Goodes, Pavlich, Franklin, Medhurst, Dangerfield, Rockliff (TDL, Podsiadly)
Thoughts?
fair point, but it is iralevent as I answerd yes in saying that all my rookies would average enough (therfore making it pointless to have any player over 105k) plus i intend to keep my rookies longer than that and i was suggesting that that would be a worst case senerio and making the point that it wouldnt be that bad, although as i said before there is proberly only going to be one seriously viable rookie in the backline and i dont regard any options around 130k as being anymore viable than the 94k ones (and if you do dont bother replying with it is a pointless argument as we mearly have differnt opinions), but apart from that as I said before there are enough viable options who will play 5-8 games in midfield, fowerd line and even at least 1 in the ruck this year. So i still dont see the point in paying more than 105k for a bench player. plus i already knew that about trengrove and he is not in my team.
xsmilekid ;
I reckon you've got one too many rookies in your midfield. Downgrade one of your forwards and upgrade one of your midfielders.
Just my two cents.
Great team! Lots of guns, so plenty of captain choices and certainly decent depth too. One of the best I've seen.What are people's thoughts on my team:
Backs: Enright, Grimes (trying to get Goddard back in but keep changing it around), Hodge, H. Shaw, Kennelly, Ladson, Hunt (Emerg: Maguire, Davis)
Mids: Bartel, Gibbs, Selwood, Armitage, Trengove, Martin (Emerg: Barlow, Banner)
Rucks: Sandilands, Hille (Emerg: Lobbe & Warnock)
Fwds: Riewoldt, Pavlich, Gia, Buddy, Ziebell, Hall, Dangerfield (Emerg: Rockliff, TDL).
What are people's thoughts on this team? I only have $16,000 but want to get Goddard back in the team at the expense of Grimes as he is way too injury prone.
Cheers.
Wow, my team structure is exactly the same as yours, not one difference..What are people's thoughts on my team:
Backs: Enright, Grimes (trying to get Goddard back in but keep changing it around), Hodge, H. Shaw, Kennelly, Ladson, Hunt (Emerg: Maguire, Davis)
Mids: Bartel, Gibbs, Selwood, Armitage, Trengove, Martin (Emerg: Barlow, Banner)
Rucks: Sandilands, Hille (Emerg: Lobbe & Warnock)
Fwds: Riewoldt, Pavlich, Gia, Buddy, Ziebell, Hall, Dangerfield (Emerg: Rockliff, TDL).
What are people's thoughts on this team? I only have $16,000 but want to get Goddard back in the team at the expense of Grimes as he is way too injury prone.
Cheers.
Northernbomberhero,
Not a bad side although I have a few issues with it:
Your backs, mids and rucks are actually not bad (ball is a good call imo) but it's your fwds which will let you down badly.
Didak is way overpriced, SJ (well there are better options at that price), and you are playing rockliff and hitchcock. Will they get game time? Also don't think Rohan will play for a while.
Maybe try to get Buddy into your fwd line (downgrade SJ) and have a look for a Dangerfield or even Bazza.
What are people's thoughts on my team:
Backs: Enright, Grimes (trying to get Goddard back in but keep changing it around), Hodge, H. Shaw, Kennelly, Ladson, Hunt (Emerg: Maguire, Davis)
Mids: Bartel, Gibbs, Selwood, Armitage, Trengove, Martin (Emerg: Barlow, Banner)
Rucks: Sandilands, Hille (Emerg: Lobbe & Warnock)
Fwds: Riewoldt, Pavlich, Gia, Buddy, Ziebell, Hall, Dangerfield (Emerg: Rockliff, TDL).
What are people's thoughts on this team? I only have $16,000 but want to get Goddard back in the team at the expense of Grimes as he is way too injury prone.
Cheers.
Use that 138,700 to improve your backlineBACKS:
Corey Enright $394,300
Luke Hodge $366,800
Heath Shaw $365,400
Clancee Pearce $246,000
Nick Malceski $242,800
Josh Hunt $164,100
Bradley Sheppard $133,500
----
Matt Maguire $101,700
Phil Davis $94,500
MIDS:
Jimmy Bartel $480,200
Bryce Gibbs $470,000
Matthew Boyd $456,400
Sam Mitchell $449,200
Dustin Martin $149,500
Mitchell Banner $94,500
----
Michael Barlow $105,800
Luke Shuey $94,500
RUCKS:
Mitch Clark $414,800
Nick Naitanui $232,400
----
Robert Warnock $101,800
Jordan Roughead $94,500
FORWARDS:
Nick Riewoldt $468,100
Ryan O'Keeffe $425,400
Daniel Giansiracusa $378,500
Lance Franklin $354,900
Eddie Betts $274,300
Hayden Ballantyne $238,400
Patrick Dangerfield $232,000
----
Tom Rockliff $101,100
Cameron Hitchcock $97,800
I've still got $138,700 left in the bank, thoughts?