Remove this Banner Ad

Rd 5 Essendon vs. Collingwood Review

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

mdc

Cancelled
Veteran 10k Posts
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Posts
13,666
Reaction score
9
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
(I'm filling in for the venerable Vincent Vegas this week - he will be the one doing these most weeks.)

As part of the new BigFooty initiative to have official Previews and Reviews of all games provided by each BigFooty team board, I'll be writing a review of each of our games from the Collingwood perspective.

The previews will, as always, be supplied by the terrific and talented DaVe86, now on a slightly more official basis, and the reviews will be supplied by myself.

____________________________________________________________

ANZAC day games have been memorable for supporters of both clubs. Win or lose, we walk away knowing we have seen a great game of footy. Few would have forgotten the day, some six years ago, when James Hird had his way with the entire Collingwood team like some cheap floosie, leading his Bombers to a 10 goal win. We might have left the ground grumpy, but ultimately, we knew we had witnessed something pretty cool. We had seen history created with our own eyeballs. And there was some measure of consolation in that, no matter how small.

No such consolation prize was on offer in the 2009 edition. The most unfortunate aspect of the entire game is that it will be falsely regarded as a "classic" due to the tight finish - a classification which severely cheapens the truly epic encounters that had preceded it.

This game, despite the finish, was one big lump of fail.

The tone was set in the opening minutes when a kick intended for an uncovered David Hille went sailing over his head, forcing him to jump and land awkwardly on one leg. His knee buckles. A sea of Pie supporters collectively fist-pump and incur the wrath of their Essendon compadres.

Hille_knee246x316a.jpg


Despite the injury, Essendon had a ton of the ball early, with Angus Monfries repeatedly finding himself with the ball inside scoring range. He couldn't capitalise, and Collingwood gained the momentum half-way through the term. Pendlebury's continued good form and a strong Macaffer mark and goal was really the highlight of what otherwise was a poor quarter of footy replete with dropped chestmarks and miskicks.

With Ryder, a part-timer, destroying Fraser in the ruck, Essendon took control in the second and third quarters. Yet the standard of football never lifted. Any goals scored seemed almost incidental - as if they were only scored because, well, someone had to score.

kerry-football-catch21.jpg



It really speaks volumes about the match that the loudest cheers up to three-quarter time were of the bronx variety - directed at an out-of-form Scott Lucas, who went deep into Essendon's back half to chase kicks.

With Essendon leading by 11 at the last change, the Pies seemed to come out in the 4th much more focused. Perhaps someone had finally informed them that there was a ridiculous gap in talent-level between their team and the injury-depleted Baby Bombers. Pendlebury and Leon Davis in particular were superb in turning a deficit into a lead, both winning the ball in stoppages, running themselves into the ground, and slotting through crucial goals from difficult angles.

With Collingwood hanging an onto a 2-goal lead, and driving forward yet again, we witnessed what would in retrospect be the turning point in the match. Rocca found himself one out with Fletcher, and as he has done countless times in his career, simply pushed the gangly veteran aside as he marked.

xemf4c7ek9f4kuk5zn544l3p26u9fn-pre.jpg


Rocca ran into an open goal, and booted the Sherrin high enough to pierce the ozone layer. The Collingwood fans rejoiced, perhaps more relieved than jubilant. But it was not to be. The little man in fluro-yellow had deemed Rocca's shove in the side illegal, and tacked on a 50m penalty as well.

Essendon sensed they had received a lifeline, and proceeded to dominate the last few minutes. They got numbers to every contest. They played with a reckless gambler mentality which is always necessary to pull off a magical comeback.

And pull it off they did. Though Zaharaharhakris will be remembered as the hero for his last second goal, it was really the culmination of intense pressure from the Bombers and inane decision making from some senior Pie players who should have been able to ice the clock that secured the result. That, and the stubborn refusal of the moustached one to flood the backline.

And as gutwrenching as the loss was, a win would only have been a marginally more positive result. An average perfomance against Adelaide was forgivable. We moved on. A loss against the beast that is Geelong was understandable. But the way the side played against a team that on paper is bottom 4 was inexcusable.

Votes

5. Pendlebury
4. Davis
3. Prestigiacomo
2. Swan
1. O'Brien
 
I think Fraser's effort has been harhsly criticised. He was ok, and we should give full credit to Ryder he played out of his skin, and ruck should be his position. He doesn't do much in the backline (either getting the ball or beating his opponent), is a 3rd tall at best in the forward line. His position should be ruck/wing. Ruckmen don't play on each other, Ryder has something like 15 tackles, how could he have stopped that? Granted he could have stopped his ruckwork, but I don't think Fraser can be given credit for Ryder's performance.

Cloke is another one who has been unfairly criticised (although not in your review MDC), sure he's been in poor form this year, but he had a positive contribution on Saturday, setting up a fair few goals with nice inside 50 entries.

My votes would have been:

5. Pendlebury
4. Davis
3. Swan
2. O'Brien
1. Prestigiacomo

Considered: Anthony, N.Brown
 
Anthony was in our best 5. In such a game of mistakes and missed chances his 4 goals were invaluable.

5: Pendlebury
4: Davis
3: Prestigiacomo
2: Anthony
1: Swan
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Cloke is another one who has been unfairly criticised (although not in your review MDC), sure he's been in poor form this year, but he had a positive contribution on Saturday, setting up a fair few goals with nice inside 50 entries.

My biggest problem with him yesterday were the two times he got the ball on the top of the goalsquare...and just decided to pass it off for some reason when he easily should have snapped a goal.

He's just down on confidence atm.
 
My biggest problem with him yesterday were the two times he got the ball on the top of the goalsquare...and just decided to pass it off for some reason when he easily should have snapped a goal.

He's just down on confidence atm.

Yeah doesn't seem himself. I know it's not exactly the standard as far as great football minds but the callers and the host of Finey's Final Siren were saying he doesn't have a high enough work rate. Sure you probably might say that seeing him this year, however that's not his usual game. He is one of the hardest working key forwards in the game, and especially one of the hardest tackling. He usually is like a bulldog when the ball hits the deck and is brilliant when the ball hits the deck but he just doesn't seem himself.
 
Once again our 3 tall defenders(harry, brown, presti) can really keep their heads up, as they kept us in the game. Lloyd and lucas had very little impact on the game, and when Lloyd got the ball it was pretty wide. We lost the game ourselves by kicking the ball in to packs, where the bombers smaller bodies were able to crumb the ball better and just run off us way to easy.
 
That was in the last. He had two other opportunities earlier, including one where he kicked it 30m backwards.
and ****ed if i knew why too he was 20 meters in the clear all round him
 
Fraser was not harshly criticised. His lack of intensity was embarassing for someone apparently captaining the side - whether this can be attributed to fatigue I'm not sure. Either way, both him and the selection commitee are responsible.

My votes:

5 - Davis
4 - Harry
3 - Pendlebury
2 - Swan
1 - Anthony
 
If I were to ask 1 question of the club this week it would be:

With David Hille out for the game and Ryder only a part timer & their ony option in the ruck, why wasn't the players told to bang into Ryder every chance they got, why wasn't Fraser & Brown jumping into him at ruck contests and why did you let a 3rd year player who is only a part time ruckman get away with not being BANGED into?

I think the game review should be centred around that question.
 
Fraser was not harshly criticised. His lack of intensity was embarassing for someone apparently captaining the side - whether this can be attributed to fatigue I'm not sure. Either way, both him and the selection commitee are responsible.

My votes:

5 - Davis
4 - Harry
3 - Pendlebury
2 - Swan
1 - Anthony
It happenes everytime he does tho.
I would love to know his record as a captain, I would dare say it would be around the 1 in 10 range.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Where do I start? This isn't an emotional thread because you guys know I don't just bag out individual players out of anger. I'm not angry, I'm just disappointed.

If there ever was an indication that Mick Malthouse needs to go, today was it. Why did we try and match a side whose strength is leg speed, with leg speed? Why did we leave the corridor so open for a side which thrives on quick passages of play through the corridor that can be very costly?

Why was Rocca played so high up the ground at stages when his direct opponent was being used as an extra player against the rest of the forwards and midfielders at the 50 arc?

There were a number of other areas which Malhouse failed in today that I haven't covered, and he needs to learn, already, that moves need to be made to change a course of a game. We cannot keep relying on Plan A when its not friggen working!

I find it hilarious how people talk down Cam Wood for looking laconic out there, yet Fraser, who I think has been in great form recently, not only got beaten by a young, raw CHB in the ruck, but also managed to look so dis-interested in contests around the ground and VERY laconic.

I really think people need to pay Leigh Brown more respect because he really makes an effort and a contest, and its a shame the same can't be said about some of your Magpie favourites out there. When he was involved in the play, we were doing really well, when we were being beaten, he was nowhere to be seen, that might mean he goes missing, but I saw it as him being a great presence around the footy for us, and its not his job, as a tall utility to be around the footy for 120 minutes.

Travis Cloke needs to harden the **** up, and start using that big body of his around the ground. He plays like a tall HFF/HBF ala Goldsack and doesn't use his size to advantage when the footy is there to be won. His best effort of the season thus far, but still has plenty of improvement to go to even be serviceable on the field.

It was very good to see Dale Thomas find a bit more of the footy, and run and carry across the wings, it was also good to see Scott Pendlebury and Dane Swan continue on his merry way.

Tarkyn Lockyer had a stinker today. A few of you guys wouldn't really care as a few don't rate him as highly as me, but he really needed to stand up in the across the middle of the ground and the wings today and he was missing for far too long. I'm disappointed in his efforts, especially since it was ANZAC day and he is usually always up the front for efforts and setting a great example.

Shannon Cox cost us the game. Plain and simple, he cost us two goals in a row, and almost cost us a third. His efforts at the start of the last was disastrous and I'm flabbergusted how he is considered a negating defender by Malthouse. He has it all to be an attacking defender and showed that again today, but he is useless on a direct opponent inside our defensive 50.

Once again, spectacular effort by Simon Prestigiacomo today. He has now conceded just 4 goals in 5 games as an AFL FB so far this season, and he has played on quality forwards line J Brown, M Lloyd and C Mooney. Congratulations once again on a very under-rated 200 AFL games, and really, for our sake, I hope we see you out there in the #35 again in 2010.

The reason why I'm not angry that we lost today was because I would've been embarressed if we'd won. Win, lose or draw for us, I thought Essendon deserved the 4 points without a doubt. They wanted it more, Knights did a better job in ensuring his 22 was in a better position to get the 4 points and overall, they were the better side today.

Finally, if anyone sees Robert Walls or that other prick from Ch10, please do not hesitate to put a bullet in their head, because they couldn't have made my day any worse with their crap.

What were your thoughts?

Posted in other thread.

Votes:

5 Pendlebury
4 Swan
3 Anthony
2 Davis
1 Harry O

Checked everyone elses votes after I'd put mine through, and noticed its the same 5 for everyone else that stood out.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom