MVP Round 18 v Richmond

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

5: Priddis - How people dont have him in their 5 is absurd.
4: Emac - Huge job on a huge flog.
3: Shuey - Great early and battled on after injury.
4: LeCras - Looked good up the ground more.
5: Schofield - Very solid defensive effort.

HM - Natanui - put it on a plate for us but drifted.
Ellis - Typical Workman like.
Hurn - Was clean but uncharacteristically average disposal
 
5. Emac, another dominating performance. But Jack was great according to Matthews :rolleyes:
4. NN, Loves the wet and 50 hitouts.
3. Shuey, Closest thing to a mid we have
2. Ellis, Solid back there
1. Lecca, Another decent game

HM: Priddis, tries hardbut doesn't have the polish. I wish we could put his work ethic into someone else.

DM: Smith & Sheed: Were they out there tonight? and Gaff for trying stupid little chips in the wet.
 
5: MacKenzie
4: Naitanui
3: Priddis
2: Shuey
1: Hutchings for his tagging job

HM: Schoey, Ellis, Lecca
DHM: The campaigner Vickery, the AFL's clash policy, rain, Vickery, anyone who comes in here complaining about other people's votes without voting themselves. Take it elsewhere. I say it every ******* week.
 
5. Mackenzie - best over the stretch
4. Shuey - started well, was our best in the first half. Did well to battle on.
3. Gaff - Ran hard, made a few errors here and there but we need more like him to win the game.
2. Schofield - won most of his contests and rebounded reasonably well in the conditions.
1. Priddis - Started slowly. Took over when Shuey went down and tied it up, which didn't effect the result at all.

HM:
Hurn - won a lot of the hard stuff and was one of the few who was strong in the air all night.
Naitanui - first quarter was good, rucking was good over the stretch.
 
? In our thread after a loss we normally trying to string our own up, but over seems pretty calm :/ interesting
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

5: Shuey
4: Hurn
3: Naitanui
2: Priddis
1: Gaff

Surprisingly, there were a few unlucky not to get a vote tonight. Alot of people voted Mackenzie but I thought I'd go in a different direction, not least because I think the conditions were always going to make it easier for him tonight.
 
Last edited:
5. Shuey: Was the most influential before injury....
4. Le Cras: Clever and skills stood out. Looked hungry.
3. Natanui: a good effort but lacked a dynamic edge, lot of hit outs and to advantage.
2. Mackenzie: Another solid day at the generals office. Him and Brown look like brothers!
1. Priddis: a solid effort from Priddis but his possessions were atrocious.

HM: Ellis, Gaff.
 
5. Priddis, by far our best tonight
4. Hutchings, Layed 13 tackles, had 18 touches as a tagger. Cotchin did FA.
3. Emac. Always one of our best week in week out.
2. Shuey, tried hard, wasn't clean but he's not Elite and never will be and the conditions were s**t.
1. Nic Nat, got heaps of contested footy and was better than expected.

HM:
Lecca and PaddyMac, can't falt their effort and desire.
Schofield is a gun under his knees. Wirraesk.
 
5 - Priddis - arguably best from both teams, how some don't even have him top 5 is beyond me
4 - Hurn - strong skippers performance - I'm hopeful he gets the full-time nod
3 - MacKenzie - one foot in the AA squad and although conditions suited still thought it was a solid thrashing of Riewoldt
2 - Naitanui - I swear he is better in the rain
1 - Gaff - thought he really stood up after half time and is getting better at winning the hard ball
HM - Shuey, Ellis, Butler, LeCras, Hutchings (for his tagging job ... with ball in hand was awful)
Our top end weren't too bad tonight but disappointed with our fringe/young players - a few too many passengers.
 
5. Mike Ellis
4. Shuey
3. Naitanui
2. Priddis
1. Gaff

It wasn't a game for tall marking forwards due to such horrendous conditions; so whilst Mackenzie was good, he doesn't get points from me for keeping Reiwoldt quiet. If conditions were dry, McFrenzies game would've earned him top votes.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top