Trades Round 4 Trades

[pincrusher]

Should that someone be DeGoey or LDU, I can't decide atm

A bit early to let rid of my mid-pricers, but the Riddler is just too juicy!

I have LDU as well. However, I have enough cash to trade out a dead or under performing rookie if I need to (Looking at you Dow).. Might need to move LDU at some stage because he's playing in a team that is getting smashed. However, he's more likely to put up decent scores than a lot of the rookies. Think he might have to be a luxury upgrade later if I can afford it trade wise.

 

[JuddgementDay]

I have LDU as well. However, I have enough cash to trade out a dead or under performing rookie if I need to (Looking at you Dow).. Might need to move LDU at some stage because he's playing in a team that is getting smashed. However, he's more likely to put up decent scores than a lot of the rookies. Think he might have to be a luxury upgrade later if I can afford it trade wise.

If you have to choose DeGoey vs LDU

 

[evo]

Tempted to go Tarrantula to Ridley, will see how he goes today I suppose

 

[Hai_Newman]

If you have to choose DeGoey vs LDU

Check bye structure if your committed to one.

 

[buttox]

at this stage
taranto to ridley
rowe to waterman

 

[pincrusher]

If you have to choose DeGoey vs LDU

I'd probably get rid of De Goey first, but hard to say. At least LDU is playing full time mid. De Goey is not. He's going to be relying on kicking goals every week for a decent score. The law of averages suggests it just won't happen consistently. Tough choice though.

 

[ForeverHardcore]

Campbell getting dropped would piss me right off. With that 118 in his 3-rd-avg, he can still get to $250k with a ~80 next week

Campbell at $250k down to Waterman for ~$150k in the bank could easily get a premo, even if he's only gone up by $60k

I don’t think they’ll drop Campbell
Just going off yesterday’s game live. He was the weakest link

He’s an elite player of the future and I think he should stay over mcinerney who is more like for like as a wingmen/midfielder for rowbottom who’s the same

 

[Hack_Watts]

I don’t think they’ll drop Campbell
Just going off yesterday’s game live. He was the weakest link

He’s an elite player of the future and I think he should stay over mcinerney who is more like for like as a wingmen/midfielder for rowbottom who’s the same

Good SC scoring doesn't determine whether a player loses his spot. Campbell played a lock down role all day and did it well. His SC score is irrelevant to Longmire.

 

[ForeverHardcore]

Good SC scoring doesn't determine whether a player loses his spot. Campbell played a lock down role all day and did it well. His SC score is irrelevant to Longmire.

He was poor live yesterday
Not equating it to supercoach at all
Turnovers and clangers were not good.

Personally I don’t think he’ll be dropped but in a team full of confidence spots are going to be hard to keep at the swans in 2021
Rowbottom being an inside mid certainly isn’t pushing Warner kennedy parker or mills out
Florent is established
A good player will miss out to get him back in. Rowbottom on the other hand might not even automatically come back with the team playing so well.
I think it’ll be mcinerney who is on the fringe. They want to get games into Campbell I’m just pointing out that in a good side spots aren’t gifted they’ll have to be earned

 

[HTPunter]

Sure, if you think 82 is an acceptable R2 score.

Better than D6 or M8 are doing?

 

[HTPunter]

Lol price means nothing to keepers at this stage man, sure you pay less now, but how many points am i and every grundy owner up on your 2nd ruck? hahaha

150 with a game in hand. Meek or Flynn 75 today you're a grand total of 75 up.

Might backfire at 7pm tonight but so far you're not thinking clearly if you think it's a "hahaha" advantage.

 

[Andrew Birch]

......

Better than D6 or M8 are doing?

You have premo's at D6 & M8?

 

[HTPunter]

Disingenuous argument. By focusing only on rucks you're ignoring that a Flynn+Meek owner had extra dollars to spend elsewhere and is quite likely putting up higher points across another line. I wish I could find an example for y... oh wait.



That's a crazy shallow backline. Seen quite a few teams fielding Clark at D6, some of them funded by rookie rucks, while you're one omission away from a round three donut.

Hahaha

Love it

 

[HTPunter]

......


You have premo's at D6 & F8?

No? But I don't have to field any shit rookies unlike a lot of the Gawndy teams I'm seeing fielding Rowe, Scott, Jones etc

 

[Andrew Birch]

No? But I don't have to field any sh*t rookies unlike a lot of the Gawndy teams I'm seeing fielding Rowe, Scott, Jones etc

Absurd argument. You will see the error of your ways soon enough.

 

[HTPunter]

Running Ridley at D2 after getting rid of Grundy in the pre-season

 

[Andrew Birch]

Running Ridley at D2 after getting rid of Grundy in the pre-season

Imagine how the teams who have Ridley at D3, Gawn AND Grundy feel.

 

[enobrien]

Imagine how the teams who have Ridley at D3, Grundy AND Gawn feel.

 

[Andrew Birch]

 

[Andrew Birch]

Non Grundy owners will be happy to know that he didn't quite make his b/e this week and will drop in price by 5k meaning you should be able to upgrade your pleb R2 to him by Rd18 if this trend continues.

 

[Veer Right]

No? But I don't have to field any sh*t rookies unlike a lot of the Gawndy teams I'm seeing fielding Rowe, Scott, Jones etc

Gawndy teams paid 1.15 million more then Fleek for an average of 50 points a round more thus far. We can add two premos elsewhere, have two rookie rucks outscoring most other rookies by a lot. Worst case scenario we lose a trade, no harm done or we win by a lot. Also get to check out other promising rucks to upgrade R3 and Hickey looks a keeper which Gawndy owners cannot consider.

Got to have a chol to begin with though.

 

[Barnzy]

Leave the Riddler alone plebs, surely you all have another bum like SP Butters to get sucked into

Ridley express leaving lockout rd 4 on route to another 130+

 

[buttox]

Gawndy teams paid 1.15 million more then Fleek for an average of 50 points a round more thus far. We can add two premos elsewhere, have two rookie rucks outscoring most other rookies by a lot. Worst case scenario we lose a trade, no harm done or we win by a lot. Also get to check out other promising rucks to upgrade R3 and Hickey looks a keeper which Gawndy owners cannot consider.

Got to have a chol to begin with though.

If gawn goes 160+ today captaincy points make there way into the argument.
such a can of worms lol

 

[Moustachio]

I would recommend holding Highmore. He'll be back sooner than later imo and can be a def doughnut loop until he does. Has a b/e of -68 so will go up 60k from his first price rise just by hitting his average.

I was "forced" to trade him out to avoid taking Cox's score :S

 

[Veer Right]

If gawn goes 160+ today captaincy points make there way into the argument.
such a can of worms lol

Gawn went 137 against two of the worst rucks ever seen in the AFL. 93 previous game against a first gamer. He's fully fit as well. But if you think he's good value, ok. If he does go 160 though, that evens out his round one score and makes it no different to placing the C on Oliver thus far.