Round 9 Discussion

[Migzeh]

Myers took an effective kick/mark in the 4th today for 1 point. Just mind boggling how CD allocates sometimes.

game was done and dusted so anything that really happens during that stage gives SFA

 

[Papa Caz]

Also **** you Parsons. Just realised the campaigner didn't even hit his BE

He hit his BE mate? His BE was 42 and he scored 47.
47 is more then 42.

 

[Kadog]

2368. For anyone who has noted my constant shit scores and sooking for past couple of months, now is a time of celebration.

Won 8 league matches, bringing my season total to 16

Tmitch Pendles Hanners Godstein Laird Adams Tuohy

I want to feel what it's like to be ranked higher than 74k again.

A win for the good guys. Well done mate!

 

[JT_the_Man]

And here I was thinking that 2210 wasn't bad...

 

[vanders]

Before lockout ends if you wanna see your players prices in your team and you have a port or Gold Coast player on the bench, try putting the E on them and all the players scores for this round will show up and their new prices too.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Yep cooked.


Playing Quivorir who doesn't even suss his team.


He has a donut

As it stood at the start of the day it was

ME - Merret C , Pridda , JJK , Gov , Sandi
VS
HIM - JJK C , Jones , SPS + 240


So me thinking i'm king Richard thinks " I KNOW , i'll be clever and switch my C to JJK to cut down the amount of his uniques....."

So it works out as

ME - Merrett , Pridda , Gov , Sandi
vs
HIM - Jones , SPS + 240



Pridda and Gov proceed to Mr Whippy me up a deluxe shit cone.
Limp my way to a 47 pt lead

Jones hits a 92 which makes the deficit to Quiv 45

Sandi vs SPS + 45

Sandi peaks at 104 with a minute left
Loses a point somehow in the last 4 seconds

Lose by 1 pre scale

SPS scales down 1 to 58 giving me a tie at least with my main league H2H season at stake



Nah Sandi loses ANOTHER point just to give me a KARMA-RIFFIC 1 point loss


All because i though i was the ****



**** OFF


1962 so picked a belter week to do it too

Urge to bomb self increasing












* Footnote - Had i left the C on Merrett then it's a 40 pt win.

Heartbreaking NSWCROW

 

[Obese Arachnid]

 

[enobrien]

And here I was thinking that 2210 wasn't bad...

Hey guess what, it isnt

 

[HawkAussie]

Come on, update the scores so we know who is doing well or not.

 

[Turkeltone]

2251 was looking at larger until my eagles players played. Hoping it's enough to move up in the rankings. It's probably around par though. Parsons is still a flog.

 

[Sydney Kicker]

Brought in Hibberd for wankbank today. Happy with that.

But seriously what the F is going on with CD scoring lately? Hibb was on 114 half way through the last q. He then has about 3-4 contested effective touches and when I check at the end he's on 110.

There is just no consistency to this shit.

Pure speculation this...

This year it seems like there's a lot of games with big momentum shifts and teams coming back from big deficits. What this seems to mean is that CD are (quite heavily) adjusting the weighting down on the scores in previous quarters while the game is in progress. They need to do this so each games total points allocated ends up adding up to the 3300 total.

Take our woeful capitulation to the Pies last night as an example. Mitchell had a huge first term and because we built up a massive lead, SC decides that the Hawks have got this one in the bag and weight the quarter heavily to reward our guys who jumped out of the blocks and "won" us the game. Then lo and behold the Pies come storming back in the 3rd. Then SC realise that the 1st quarter actually meant f all and gradually the first quarter weighting comes down and down as the Pies get closer. They have to do this so they can appropriately reward the pies players that drive the comeback. So even though Mitchell keeps racking up the disposals in the 3rd term and keeps earning points, every couple of minutes he loses a small portion from the points he earned in the first half as the Pies pile on the goals and the weighting on the early part of the game continues to diminish.

That's my theory anyway. Would probably also explain Doc today.

 

[fuic08]

2151, heading for a slide down the ranks

 

[KardiniaPark]

Next bloke that posts 2200+ I'll hunt down and bitch slap.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Hurry up lockout I want to see where I am ranked overall.

I am going to guess and say 737.

 

[KardiniaPark]

KP >

 

[gutsroy]

Before lockout ends if you wanna see your players prices in your team and you have a port or Gold Coast player on the bench, try putting the E on them and all the players scores for this round will show up and their new prices too.

App? Doesn't work for me in browser.
Tidy work for figuring that sort of stuff out.

 

[cdcanman]

2319.

Yeo disappointing considering I bought him this week, but not really too much to complain about other than that.
Finally got some cash generating now too, thankyou Mr's Barrett, Fisher and Hannan for finally coming good. Add them to Newman, McGrath, SPP and Butler still hanging around, things not looking too bad. Ready to climb

 

[HawkAussie]

One of my fellow league teams scored over 2400 this week

 

[qarocks]

Seriously, just ****ing open

 

[ldamico]

Open the f*cken website, wanna see where 2455 gets me

 

[vanders]

App? Doesn't work for me in browser.
Tidy work for figuring that sort of stuff out.

Yeah it works in the app. Same thing happens if you go to the gameday part and click on all games, the price next to their name is their new price

 

[JDavey]

Pure speculation this...

This year it seems like there's a lot of games with big momentum shifts and teams coming back from big deficits. What this seems to mean is that CD are (quite heavily) adjusting the weighting down on the scores in previous quarters while the game is in progress. They need to do this so each games total points allocated ends up adding up to the 3300 total.

Take our woeful capitulation to the Pies last night as an example. Mitchell had a huge first term and because we built up a massive lead, SC decides that the Hawks have got this one in the bag and weight the quarter heavily to reward our guys who jumped out of the blocks and "won" us the game. Then lo and behold the Pies come storming back in the 3rd. Then SC realise that the 1st quarter actually meant f all and gradually the first quarter weighting comes down and down as the Pies get closer. They have to do this so they can appropriately reward the pies players that drive the comeback. So even though Mitchell keeps racking up the disposals in the 3rd term and keeps earning points, every couple of minutes he loses a small portion from the points he earned in the first half as the Pies pile on the goals and the weighting on the early part of the game continues to diminish.

That's my theory anyway. Would probably also explain Doc today.

I fully believe this is what they're doing as well from watching games/scores simultaneously - seems like a lot of live adjustments based on who is winning/losing.

 

[KardiniaPark]

Next bloke that posts 2200+ I'll hunt down and bitch slap.

2319.

Yeo disappointing considering I bought him this week, but not really too much to complain about other than that.
Finally got some cash generating now too, thankyou Mr's Barrett, Fisher and Hannan for finally coming good. Add them to Newman, McGrath, SPP and Butler still hanging around, things not looking too bad. Ready to climb

You sonofabitch.

 

[Kadog]

Hurry up and open. I want to trade in that Huge Green Wood or 'The Incredible Chol' as I'd like to call him.

 

[qarocks]

Finally