- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Posts
- 18,465
- Reaction score
- 30,653
- Location
- Behind You...
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Justice League
Who would you rather be in the Carlton 22?
Russell or Browne?
Browne
Pros
Hard at the contest, very physical, skillfull, strong, seems to find ways to kick goals consistantly when played forward, has a good footy brain which is evident of his ability to play the back flank so well.
Cons
Not all that quick but not slow either.
Russell
Pros
An athlete they are trying to turn into a footballer. Speed. Good hands overhead. Could be slightly improving.
Cons
No footy brain, doesn't read the game, his team mates or opponents well. Doesn't run to the right places at the right time. Kicking isn't great. Handpasssing is not much good. Turning circle and ball handling below his knees is not great. His motivational levels are all over the place, some times he looks great and goes very hard and other times he goes missing and doesn't go as hard at the contests.
My answer
Browne for me, Russell is a player who looks good when we are going well but when the game is very even and there to be won he's poor (like Cloke). We need players who won't let us down when we play good sides and that's what we will be doing in finals. Players who perform poorly in big games are called passengers.
IMO these two play the same role and I think Browne would be the better option. Thoughts?
Russell or Browne?
Browne
Pros
Hard at the contest, very physical, skillfull, strong, seems to find ways to kick goals consistantly when played forward, has a good footy brain which is evident of his ability to play the back flank so well.
Cons
Not all that quick but not slow either.
Russell
Pros
An athlete they are trying to turn into a footballer. Speed. Good hands overhead. Could be slightly improving.
Cons
No footy brain, doesn't read the game, his team mates or opponents well. Doesn't run to the right places at the right time. Kicking isn't great. Handpasssing is not much good. Turning circle and ball handling below his knees is not great. His motivational levels are all over the place, some times he looks great and goes very hard and other times he goes missing and doesn't go as hard at the contests.
My answer
Browne for me, Russell is a player who looks good when we are going well but when the game is very even and there to be won he's poor (like Cloke). We need players who won't let us down when we play good sides and that's what we will be doing in finals. Players who perform poorly in big games are called passengers.
IMO these two play the same role and I think Browne would be the better option. Thoughts?







