- Joined
- Sep 30, 2014
- Posts
- 18,956
- Reaction score
- 40,140
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
How’s the potential to cause injury here?
That’s 3 weeks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: St Kilda v Hawthorn - Rd 12 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Hawks at 66% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 12 Games
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 12
SuperCoach Rd 12 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - 2026 Fight MND Comp ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 12 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
I'd seriously prefer a Saudi-funded rebel league to form as a **** you to the AFL. Hopefully the class action lawsuits bankrupt them.3 weeks for winding a bloke…..this game has now become a farce.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
They did, and he won a BrownlowMake absolutely no mistake some Vic-based media darling will go to the tribunal and get a very different result.
Yep. We should go for broke here. They have caned this club far too often and we've bent over.& seek a court injunction like Sydney did for Hall.
How’s the potential to cause injury here?
That’s 3 weeks.
Stage a walkout on 23 minutes from the AO.I'm the same.
Perhaps we should start a petition of actual members threatening to pull our support as we have no confidence in the AFL acting fairly.
The AFL can get funked!
Not when you have AFL media shills like Whately and Barrett defending the decisionI think people will be highlighting this example of corruption for a long time
They would have been told to tow the AFL line or suffer a finewill be interesting to hear the club statement on this
How’s the potential to cause injury here?
That’s 3 weeks.
The Appeals Board is part of the AFL

Yeah Motlop hit Dekonning with his shoulder running past and got him highHaven't been watching tonight's game, but has there been any big bumps to the body resulting in no injury?
Now they can just suspend players for any amount of games based on some nebulous potential injury.The "potential to cause injury" can be used however they want.
Tribunal: "We believe it had a potential to cause injury"
Defence: "How?"
Tribunal: "We believe it did"
Defence: "What about these examples that we compare it to?"
Tribunal: "You can't compare incidents"
That's it, basically.
Curnow hip and shouldered Zac tuohy in the head in a marking contest/collision.. tuohy fell backwards and smashed the back of his head on the ground pretty hard.. had to come off.. not sure if they did a HIA..Haven't been watching tonight's game, but has there been any big bumps to the body resulting in no injury?
Had the potential to knock him out by centimetres... surely 5 games.Yeah Motlop hit Dekonning with his shoulder running past and got him high

I would rather get into PickleballYou know it’s bad when people say they’d rather follow Nor’d