- Jun 16, 2012
- 12,249
- 9,694
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
From memory Smith took ages to make his first ton too, so his conversion rate would probably also be even better since then.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2 years I was referring to was 2015 and 16 so since the beginning of 2015 he has made 4 100s and 12 50s
Smith scored his first century after he already had 5 50s so has 14 100s and 11 50s since then.From memory Smith took ages to make his first ton too, so his conversion rate would probably also be even better since then.
A look at the young stalwarts of today
Virat Kohli needs to score 1086 runs without being dismissed (twice the current record) or, more practically, 1686 runs in ten dismissed innings to reach an average of 60. This is so difficult that I would go on record by saying that Kohli will never reach 60 in his career.
Kane Williamson has to score nearly 2000 runs in ten dismissed innings to reach an average of 60. Quite a tough task indeed.
Joe Root is the only one of the top four top young batsmen of today to have any chance of reaching an average of 60. To reach this, he has to score 914 runs in ten completed innings (around eight Tests). This is well within the realms of possibility.
Steven Smith himself has to score at around 90 runs per Test to maintain the average of 60. Hashim Amla and AB de Villiers, with averages of around 51 in the 100 or so Tests they have played have very little chance of reaching an average of 60. They need to score around 2000 runs in the next ten dismissed innings to reach this mark.
Adam Voges, who is currently flying at an average of 95.50 needs to score the remaining 1663 runs to cross the qualifying mark in no more than 36 completed innings. This is a relatively easy task since it works to only about 46 runs per innings. However it means that Voges would have to be selected for about 25 Tests more for Australia: Almost impossible to visualise, considering Voges' age.
Great article here on the batsmen who have reached (or got close enough to) the incredible average of 60. Ponting reaching the mark after 107 tests is staggering and deserves to be highlighted whenever the Tendulkar / Ponting / Lara / Kallis debate comes up.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/1009335.html
This is not a ranking list of the batsmen/bowlers nor is it a ratings exercise. It has to be accepted, however, that the batsmen and bowlers who make this collection are amongst the best ever and could form a terrific team. Those who did not make these lists might form an even better team. A request to the readers: please understand this article properly and avoid making half-baked comments
Great article here on the batsmen who have reached (or got close enough to) the incredible average of 60. Ponting reaching the mark after 107 tests is staggering and deserves to be highlighted whenever the Tendulkar / Ponting / Lara / Kallis debate comes up.
Only one of them's not a tosser, and that's Williamson.It's pretty clear Smith's form fell away a bit. Root, then Williamson going on those figures.
Two tests make a career.Finding it hard to believe the amount of s**t Kohli is copping for two tests without a score.
Two tests make a career.
It's odd. He's one of my favourite batsmen around (Amla and Williamson fanboy) and i rate Root above him. But I don't think he's mentally there for this test. His leaves have been so misjudged
Smith's record is better than all of them. Now I'm not saying that automatically makes him better than them, but I think it's a bit silly to be wondering how much worse than them he allegedly is. I think nostalgia might be colouring your view a little.how much worse is Smith, Kohli, Root, Williamson than Lara, Tendaulkar, Ponting, Kallis. Normally you'd expect the next generation to be better than the earlier one but that doesn't seem to apply in cricket.
Smith's record is better than all of them. Now I'm not saying that automatically makes him better than them, but I think it's a bit silly to be wondering how much worse than them he allegedly is. I think nostalgia might be colouring your view a little.
What? There was only Lara.In the last generation of cricket the conversation was very much 'Ponting, Tendulkar, Lara, Kallis' as to who was the best batsmen of their generation.
Nostalgia might be affecting your view of past bowlers, too. Ponting plundered many a mediocre attack. Also, does Smith use a larger bat?Nope no nostalgia. Lara and Tendulkar were clearly a class above and I doubt you'll find many serious people arguing that Smith > Ponting. They faced better bowlers on worse pitches with normal bats.
I think the 'weird'ness of Smiths technique makes it easy to underrate him a little. It's hard to believe he's the best batsman in the world when he's leaving the ball by twirling his bat around.Smith's record is better than all of them. Now I'm not saying that automatically makes him better than them, but I think it's a bit silly to be wondering how much worse than them he allegedly is. I think nostalgia might be colouring your view a little.