- Thread starter
- #51
Quiet youThat's such a Carlton thing to say.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hit bigfooty.com/howto to find out how to change your user name, delete your account, post a new thread, post pictures and videos and much more.
Open a Support Ticket if you have a specific support issue.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
Quiet youThat's such a Carlton thing to say.
I was wondering if I was the only one who comes here to have a laugh.This Feedback board is hilarious.
Things that took place like the close Bomber focus group are actually the reason reactions to the Essendon fans from that board are seen as lighthanded compared conversely to Carlton supporter seen trolling that board for example. If posters pretty much were told clearly about this sort of stuff taking place then think there would wholly be a lot less bitching and complaining about certain Essendon supporters being given some favourable treatment as it is very obvious this was done to cater for the specific interests of Essendon supporters in reation to the operation of the hot topic boards.
What complete and utter rubbish.
From the perspective of some Essendon supporters they were/are being unfairly persecuted and whole board is a troll with official sanction.
And they're right!
Wait, I mean the mod team does not endorse any position on the matter.
In all seriousness, believe me when I say that Essendon posters cop a lot of crap on Hot Topic - the deleted posts attacking Essendon posters probably number in the thousands on there, and it's only been active for a year.
Why is that rubbish? Education or information on a matter is beneficial. Allows people to judge the facts on all fours before making a decision. In my opinion it made things like the lesser heavy punishment of Essendon fans become more noticeable and better explained.What complete and utter rubbish.
From the perspective of some Essendon supporters they were/are being unfairly persecuted and whole board is a troll with official sanction.
Why is that rubbish? Education or information on a matter is beneficial. Allows people to judge the facts on all fours before making a decision. In my opinion it made things like the lesser heavy punishment of Essendon fans become more noticeable and better explained.
Why is that rubbish? Education or information on a matter is beneficial. Allows people to judge the facts on all fours before making a decision. In my opinion it made things like the lesser heavy punishment of Essendon fans become more noticeable and better explained.
Why is that rubbish? Education or information on a matter is beneficial. Allows people to judge the facts on all fours before making a decision. In my opinion it made things like the lesser heavy punishment of Essendon fans become more noticeable and better explained.
It's rubbish because what you have said is 100% false.Why is that rubbish? Education or information on a matter is beneficial. Allows people to judge the facts on all fours before making a decision. In my opinion it made things like the lesser heavy punishment of Essendon fans become more noticeable and better explained.
Please direct me to where you have knowledge of what punishments have been handed out to Essendon fans. If you put as much effort as you have in this thread to your MB posting then perhaps you wouldn't spend so much time off it.
Please direct me to where you have knowledge of what punishments have been handed out to Essendon fans. If you put as much effort as you have in this thread to your MB posting then perhaps you wouldn't spend so much time off it.
Yeah so when you are involved in a shitfight with an Essendon poster who is coming back with comments equally as abusive/non mb worth y etc and there is only one who is thread banned (which was not the essendon supporter hilariously) you have to shake your head and wonder. Also again I got back to wookie post where he received mass likes off people fro non essendon background where he commented on essendon supporters getting moderating penalties. I think there is two that say enough right there.It's rubbish because what you have said is 100% false.
Until you get appointed as a mod you have no idea just how much of your own time you're volunteering behind the scenes to keep the place running as smooth as possible.
Not much offends me but it is actually incredibally annoying and offensive when people who are completely ignorant of the facts try and tell us what we are and aren't doing.
Yeah so when you are involved in a shitfight with an Essendon poster who is coming back with comments equally as abusive/non mb worth y etc and there is only one who is thread banned (which was not the essendon supporter hilariously) you have to shake your head and wonder. Also again I got back to wookie post where he received mass likes off people fro non essendon background where he commented on essendon supporters getting moderating penalties. I think there is two that say enough right there.
Also as for the standards of posting the irony is it is some of the worse posters (based on the bogus definition it relates to infraction) are actually the better posters.
Also as for the standards of posting the irony is it is some of the worse posters (based on the bogus definition it relates to infraction) are actually the better posters.
Yeah so when you are involved in a shitfight with an Essendon poster who is coming back with comments equally as abusive/non mb worth y etc and there is only one who is thread banned (which was not the essendon supporter hilariously) you have to shake your head and wonder.
Also as for the standards of posting the irony is it is some of the worse posters (based on the bogus definition it relates to infraction) are actually the better posters.
Doesn't mean they are bad poster for not simply staying within the rules. As for banning the more disruptive of the two it sets a double standard.In a two person shitfight, it's much easier to just ban the more disruptive/abusive poster of the two.
Except that they clearly can't stay within the rules...
Doesn't mean they are bad poster for not simply staying within the rules
Again, you can't see posters' infraction records. Or the hundreds of rubbish posts we delete every single day.Yeah so when you are involved in a shitfight with an Essendon poster who is coming back with comments equally as abusive/non mb worth y etc and there is only one who is thread banned (which was not the essendon supporter hilariously) you have to shake your head and wonder. Also again I got back to wookie post where he received mass likes off people fro non essendon background where he commented on essendon supporters getting moderating penalties. I think there is two that say enough right there.
Also as for the standards of posting the irony is it is some of the worse posters (based on the bogus definition it relates to infraction) are actually the better posters.
1. It does mean exactly that; they're generally posting poorly.Doesn't mean they are bad poster for not simply staying within the rules. As for banning the more disruptive of the two it sets a double standard.
Really? The bay 13 meltdown thread which fyfie enjoyed immensely fits exactly into this category.Im not wanting to be the guy that points out the obvious, but this is kind of the definition of being a bad poster.