Remove this Banner Ad

Media Swans Talk in the Media 2024

Our club in the Media

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
MOD NOTICE ON COPYWRITTTEN CONTENT
This content is brought to you by Chief and the Mods of Big Footy.
PLEASE READ:

A reminder to all on the rules of copywritten content.

You will be held responsible for the articles you post that infringe copyright.

Mods will issue warnings when posters reproduce full articles on Big Footy.

You will receive something like this and an initial 1-point infraction. Contued posting of articles will incur a Serious Infraction of 5 points.

So please remember, when using material that may be the copyright of another party, you must:
  • Use only that portion you are directly commenting on. A reasonable guide might be a paragraph or two.
  • Always link to the source.
 
Last edited:
Jay Clark is the absolute pits.

Many in the footy media scrum are ignorant and disinterested towards the non-Victorian clubs, but I don't buy that any of them actually hate them or have a vested interest in seeing them fail.

Clark absolutely hates them and have heard from a reliable source if he had his way it would be the 10 Vic clubs like it once was.
He's no good . His waste of a show on a Tuesday has him and Ralph opposite and i have it from great authority that Clark and Ralp despise one another , in fact both deserve Murdoch
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Brenton Sanderson at around 10.30 on SENs Vicar of Whately show gave a terrific preview of the Bloods and Giants game with some decent analysis of both teams .

I'm a big fan of Sanderson as a commentator/analyst. I'd be ok with him in an assistant coaching role too if it ever arises. [Always a chance if he's willing to come to Sydney because he's tight with Tom Harley.]

Thanks Lachlan! All anyone needs to do is expand your screen after clicking on the tweet.



I'm impressed that the Terror (a) has a double page spread previewing an AFL match; and (b) avoided any references to bridges. I hope the Giants hate the bridge thing too, although possibly they have less reason to.
 
I'm a big fan of Sanderson as a commentator/analyst. I'd be ok with him in an assistant coaching role too if it ever arises. [Always a chance if he's willing to come to Sydney because he's tight with Tom Harley.]
I confess I find his tactical analysis pretty shallow and 'meh'.

And I'm not sure how you can preview a match like ours this weekend, stressing how expertly both teams move the ball, without checking the weather forecast and realising that both teams need to find different ways to play tomorrow. Everything else becomes somewhat redundant.
 
I'm impressed that the Terror (a) has a double page spread previewing an AFL match; and (b) avoided any references to bridges. I hope the Giants hate the bridge thing too, although possibly they have less reason to.
Giants media have been using the Battle of the Bridge to troll Swan fans. Really disappointing because we've fought so long & hard to get rid of that ridiculous moniker.
 
I think King is right - but for the wrong reasons. I don't think Longmire has questions about whether Parker is in our best 23 (though I could be proved wrong). He (Longmire) was explicit in his team selection video that Parker has been out for 9 weeks, and he wants to make sure he (Parker) has the right fitness base before he comes back into the team so that he can be a strong contributor for the rest of the season.

Rampe, on the other hand, has only missed three weeks.

That said, I won't be surprised if Parker is a late switch into the team for all the reasons we've already discussed.
 
Surely that David King saying we're flying and Parker needs to earn his way back in is not the same David King who a few weeks ago was saying we're basically Heeney or bust, who was not the same David King who a few weeks before that said we have so many weapons if one doesn't get you, another will?

Yep. Same David King.

I don't blame David King. I'll reiterate my point from the other day. I blame the relentless self-contradictions these media pundits are cornered into when forced to offer comments and reactions to an ever-changing competition on a weekly basis.

Make these programs a monthly thing and you'd get more sense - and more consistency - from them. Will never happen though with how much money they make.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

And some others like Deewayne Russell
Dwayne & Gerard has always used it. It interesting that a fair few people outside of NSW seem to find Battle of the Bridge a nifty name. They're seemingly unaware how much NSW people hate it with a loathing passion. Gerard doesn't help because he loves it and uses it at every opportunity he gets.
 
Dwayne & Gerard has always used it. It interesting that a fair few people outside of NSW seem to find Battle of the Bridge a nifty name. They're seemingly unaware how much NSW people hate it with a loathing passion. Gerard doesn't help because he loves it and uses it at every opportunity he gets.
Was it originally intended to be a geographical thing? Like you're on one side of the bridge, we're on the other? Which understandably makes little sense.

Or is it just randomly inserting a local landmark into the name? Like battle of the big pineapple.

I never really understood who started it or why
 
Was it originally intended to be a geographical thing? Like you're on one side of the bridge, we're on the other? Which understandably makes little sense.

Or is it just randomly inserting a local landmark into the name? Like battle of the big pineapple.

I never really understood who started it or why
I think Kevin Sheedy started it from memory.
 
Surely that David King saying we're flying and Parker needs to earn his way back in is not the same David King who a few weeks ago was saying we're basically Heeney or bust, who was not the same David King who a few weeks before that said we have so many weapons if one doesn't get you, another will?

Yep. Same David King.

I don't blame David King. I'll reiterate my point from the other day. I blame the relentless self-contradictions these media pundits are cornered into when forced to offer comments and reactions to an ever-changing competition on a weekly basis.

Make these programs a monthly thing and you'd get more sense - and more consistency - from them. Will never happen though with how much money they make.

exactly ... as has been noted a few times recently, king is one who makes such "bold" statements, declarations almost, that his contradictions are more noticeable
and while he might say the swans are "flying", he still doesn't seem to rate us longer term
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Dwayne & Gerard has always used it. It interesting that a fair few people outside of NSW seem to find Battle of the Bridge a nifty name. They're seemingly unaware how much NSW people hate it with a loathing passion. Gerard doesn't help because he loves it and uses it at every opportunity he gets.

Why do NSW people hate it with a loathing passion? I find it silly since there's no bridge but I don't 'loath' it.
 
I do like that it's more regularly just referred to as the Sydney Derby. I find those franchise-esque names for things a bit cringe. Even the Showdown is a bit lame. WA Derby, SA Derby, NSW Derby, QLD Derby. All fine. Problematic if they add a third WA team but cross that, er, bridge if it comes.
 
Dwayne & Gerard has always used it. It interesting that a fair few people outside of NSW seem to find Battle of the Bridge a nifty name. They're seemingly unaware how much NSW people hate it with a loathing passion. Gerard doesn't help because he loves it and uses it at every opportunity he gets.
Battle of the Blood Oranges?

I don’t know - there’s just nothing that really works.

Battle of the Bridge certainly doesn’t.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top