Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because he's Collingwood I wouldn't be surprised if he gets even more then that.
We always seem to get a few extra weeks thrown on just because of who we are.
The intent was completely different. Gibbs intent was to hurt Jays wasn't.. That went a long way in deciding it.This is all completely irrelevant. Both illegal tackles. Schulz was lucky the Tribunal was influenced by the media storm surrounding the Gibbs' decision.
How do you know what someone's intent was?The intent was completely different. Gibbs intent was to hurt Jays wasn't.. That went a long way in deciding it.
The main board is absolutely toxic, I can't even go there anymore cos it just makes me angry people can be so bitter and biased..People on BigFooty saying he could get 7-11 weeks . Lol.
Has anyone asked if Westhoff started the whole thing?
And wouldn't that be a comfort to his parents and partner if any permanent damage had occurredThe intent was completely different. Gibbs intent was to hurt Jays wasn't.
Bit surprised by your supporters' reaction to this. Most neutrals on the MRP board are predicting 2-8 weeks.
Theres no such thing as neutral when it comes to Collingwood...Bit surprised by your supporters' reaction to this. Most neutrals on the MRP board are predicting 2-8 weeks.
Pinned the arms and slammed him into the turf and knocked him out
You don't need to count actions to know that's a tragedy waiting to happen
What the hell would that have to do with anything if he got brain damage??You don't think the Swans players would have retaliated in some way/shape/form if they felt it was such a bad act?
It was unfortunate that he got knocked out - but the reaction from the Swans players said it all. Not one of them reacted.
It was exactly like Gibbs, the sling tackle was outlawed 12 months ago, why in **** is anyone counting actions?
Again, look at player reactions. Listen to commentator reactions. As soon as Gray got tackled, the commentators were all going "ohhhhh" whereas they didn't even notice Richards one.
Perhaps you can take a valium for your shock if your mum has one lying aboutBit surprised by your supporters' reaction to this. Most neutrals on the MRP board are predicting 2-8 weeks.
Classic!So we might as well Let Him Go Then?
Was Stupid but What got him so mad in he 1st Place?
Again
What the hell would that have to do with anything if he got brain damage??
It was outlawed for a reason, and it's nothing to do with intent
Again
What the hell would that have to do with anything if he got brain damage??
It was outlawed for a reason, and it's nothing to do with intent
Yes you can because the sling tackle is outlawedIt's a contact sport and sometimes accidents happen. It would be extremely unfortunate if something bad like brain damage came out of it, but you can't go suspending players every time someone gets hurt.
It's a contact sport and sometimes accidents happen. It would be extremely unfortunate if something bad like brain damage came out of it, but you can't go suspending players every time someone gets hurt.
Some actions warrant a suspension, and others don't.
Having said all of this, I didn't think Gibbs deserved 2 weeks. And after he got two weeks, I wouldn't have been bitter if Schulz did get 2 weeks as well. However, I can see the difference in the tackles, and it's hard to explain but i'll give it a bash.
Gibbs had Gray's movements under his control. He had a good grab of him and slung him into the ground.
Schulz also had a good grab of Richards, but Richards had momentum, which governed the direction that he fell when tackled.
Think of it as tackling a somewhat stationary person, compared to someone running. When tackling a stationary person, you have a lot of control in which way they fall. Gibbs slammed him into the ground.
Schulz tackled him to ground with the momentum from Richards running.
In any case, this isn't about Schulz/Gibbs. Adams appears to be a beast of a player and coming along well. However anyone that doesn't think the knees to the head weren't intentional are kidding themselves. The first fifty knees would have got him 0 weeks and a fine, as he wasn't dropping his knee into Westhoff, rather using his knee to hold him down. Happens in wrestles all the time, nothing in it.
Then there was the final knee drop and jab which was most definitely an intentional knee drop, which is where he'll get his weeks. Knee drop to the head and jab, should be 3+1 = 4 weeks total.
The last one was bad but not 4 weeks worth. Did not hurt him so 2 weeks at most